TV Deals

Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: TV Deals

Post by Autobarn »

Are the rest of Hennessy stable staying on Sky? (apart from Froch?)

I suppose a whole stable going over to ITV wouldn't be great, as ITV don't seemt to offer that many dates.
Last edited by Autobarn on 19 Jul 2008, 13:19, edited 1 time in total.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: TV Deals

Post by leforge »

Khan not tied to setanta it will be fun to see what happens
whatashambles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 665
Joined: 14 Nov 2006, 13:30

Re: TV Deals

Post by whatashambles »

Autobarn wrote:whatashambles, how about Kell Brook?
I apologise I forgot about Brook. Having said that though, he's a Welterweight which in terms of fighting for a World title ain't going to be easy and is perhaps a bit soon.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: TV Deals

Post by Autobarn »

Allegedly?
Maelstrom
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 425
Joined: 30 Nov 2007, 19:05

Re: TV Deals

Post by Maelstrom »

Ant Evans wrote:
Autobarn wrote:Allegedly?
Well, that's what allegedly doing the rounds on the whispher rounds of boxing writers.
How would you know... you are not a boxing writer anymore.

It is debatable that you ever were. You can't even spell whisper.
Maelstrom
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 425
Joined: 30 Nov 2007, 19:05

Re: TV Deals

Post by Maelstrom »

Ant Evans wrote: Oh dear, I made a typo! How silly of me. Still, I made a damn fine living for 10 years by writing about boxing, got the best seat in the house at the best fights, was there to see "history" happen right in front of my eyes, got to hang out with some of the greatest names in the sport, became friends with some of the coolest guys I've ever met, so I must have done something right.

And I've got clippings of bylined articles in some of the best boxing publications in the whole world circa 1997 -2007. Debate that, bitch!
I am not so insecure in my own achievements that I have to justify them. I am m not the one who came on here bigging myself up.

You are the new SPUD.
whatashambles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 665
Joined: 14 Nov 2006, 13:30

Re: TV Deals

Post by whatashambles »

Ant Evans wrote:
Autobarn wrote:Allegedly?
"Allegedly" it is 11 fights over 1 year, with 4 PPVs on Sky Box Office. Allegedly whatshisname thinks UK public is ready to throw down £15 a time to see whatshisface's next 4 mismatches.
What would happen with the Setanta deal?
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: TV Deals

Post by leforge »

Would you pay for pay per view for Khan
Gray-Fox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1138
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 19:33

Re: TV Deals

Post by Gray-Fox »

leforge wrote:Would you pay for pay per view for Khan
Never.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: TV Deals

Post by leforge »

I wonder who Khan opponent will be must be better than previous if on pay per view
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Setanta deal over .............................

Post by whiskey »

...before it began.

Thats what the grapevine tells me.

11 fight deal with sky.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Setanta deal over .............................

Post by whiskey »

And i dont mean the hayemaker either.
EddieShredder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: TV Deals

Post by EddieShredder »

Who's gonna be on PPV? Surely not Khan... how the hell are sky going to sell that??

If Sky are indeed taking Mr Warren back, you'd like to think they've learnt their lesson and will insist on higher quality match ups - especially on PPV shows.

There's not one Warren fighter i'd pay (PPV or Live show) to watch at the moment...
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: TV Deals

Post by leforge »

I think people would pay to watch Khan. I am sure the match up will be better now, the WBU will be binned.
whatashambles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 665
Joined: 14 Nov 2006, 13:30

Re: TV Deals

Post by whatashambles »

leforge wrote:I think people would pay to watch Khan. I am sure the match up will be better now, the WBU will be binned.
What happens if he gets KO'd or beaten in his first step up? If they threw him in there with John Murray and Murray won, Sky would be fucked.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: TV Deals

Post by leforge »

Sky did say they had some new contracts, we know that matchroom and maloney are there.
fatboy2008
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 67
Joined: 10 Jul 2008, 09:38

Re: TV Deals

Post by fatboy2008 »

Ant Evans wrote:All talk and BS at this point, but there are top boxing insiders who swear they "know" what's going down TV wise. We shall see...
You could be right, depending on what journalist you speak to is entirely dependent what story you will get told.

I will state again with Warren, why move unless Sky TV are paying more than Setanta and Warrens mate is the head of sport at Setanta, Trevor East or something like that which makes me even more sceptical that Warren will move. But anything I suppose is possible in boxing!!!
Post Reply