Page 3 of 3

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 04 Dec 2008, 23:08
by Elton John
Collins2000 wrote:Wilfred's one punch KO of my old favourite Maurice Hope is chilling.

Mo was in good form going into that fight but he was no match for Benitez.

Incidently, has anyone ever seen Hope's 15th round TKO over Antuerfermo? I'd like to see that.
Mo was not in good form, he was in terrible form by that time-certainly not the same he was for Vito.

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 04 Dec 2008, 23:10
by Elton John
Counter-puncher wrote:
Collins2000 wrote:Wilfred's one punch KO of my old favourite Maurice Hope is chilling.

Mo was in good form going into that fight but he was no match for Benitez.

Incidently, has anyone ever seen Hope's 15th round TKO over Antuerfermo? I'd like to see that.
no, and i have never seen anyone explain how the man who later went 15 with Hagler, could get stopped by Hope.... :confused:
Cuts, that's how. Otherwise Vito can rumble all night long. Somehow, Vito got by 15 rounds of Hagler without significant damage.

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 05 Dec 2008, 01:40
by Collins2000
Elton John wrote:
Collins2000 wrote:Wilfred's one punch KO of my old favourite Maurice Hope is chilling.

Mo was in good form going into that fight but he was no match for Benitez.

Incidently, has anyone ever seen Hope's 15th round TKO over Antuerfermo? I'd like to see that.
Mo was not in good form, he was in terrible form by that time-certainly not the same he was for Vito.
Elton, you have already provided us with much hilarity in the Terry Norris thread. Good to see you are doing the same here, buddy.

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 05 Dec 2008, 01:51
by Collins2000
Elton John wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:
Collins2000 wrote:Wilfred's one punch KO of my old favourite Maurice Hope is chilling.

Mo was in good form going into that fight but he was no match for Benitez.

Incidently, has anyone ever seen Hope's 15th round TKO over Antuerfermo? I'd like to see that.
no, and i have never seen anyone explain how the man who later went 15 with Hagler, could get stopped by Hope.... :confused:
Cuts, that's how. Otherwise Vito can rumble all night long. Somehow, Vito got by 15 rounds of Hagler without significant damage.
Cuts, eh?

It's obvious from your posts that your knowledge of boxing is almost non-existant.

Here's a quote regarding the bout from http://www.thesweetscience.com/boxing-a ... tough-guy/

On October 1, 1976 in Rome (Italy), he lost the belt against Maurice Hope (TKO15). According to Antuofermo, the official should have let him continue until the end (which was only 15 seconds away). Vito claimed to have weight problems in the weeks prior to the fight. Since he didn’t have a diet specialist in his team, he didn’t lose weight properly and was weak during the fight. With the years, Maurice Hope proved to be a true champion.

On March 4, 1979 he won the WBC world light middleweight title and held it until May 23, 1981.


No mention of cuts there Elton. And how often would a fight be stopped on cuts with just 15 seconds to go?

But then again you just pull your comments out of your arse don't you?

:D

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 13 Dec 2008, 02:48
by Elton John
Collins2000 wrote:
Cuts, eh?

It's obvious from your posts that your knowledge of boxing is almost non-existant.

Here's a quote regarding the bout from http://www.thesweetscience.com/boxing-a ... tough-guy/

On October 1, 1976 in Rome (Italy), he lost the belt against Maurice Hope (TKO15). According to Antuofermo, the official should have let him continue until the end (which was only 15 seconds away). Vito claimed to have weight problems in the weeks prior to the fight. Since he didn’t have a diet specialist in his team, he didn’t lose weight properly and was weak during the fight. With the years, Maurice Hope proved to be a true champion.

On March 4, 1979 he won the WBC world light middleweight title and held it until May 23, 1981.


No mention of cuts there Elton. And how often would a fight be stopped on cuts with just 15 seconds to go?

But then again you just pull your comments out of your arse don't you?

:D
That's a fine way to be talking to your betters.

The article doesnt tell much-period. Hard to tell exactly what happened but an educated guess would suggest lacerations forced a stoppage.

I've seen Hope and he resembled a punching bag. I have to wonder: were all jr middleweights that slow back then?

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 16:06
by Collins2000
Elton John wrote:
Collins2000 wrote:
Cuts, eh?

It's obvious from your posts that your knowledge of boxing is almost non-existant.

Here's a quote regarding the bout from http://www.thesweetscience.com/boxing-a ... tough-guy/

On October 1, 1976 in Rome (Italy), he lost the belt against Maurice Hope (TKO15). According to Antuofermo, the official should have let him continue until the end (which was only 15 seconds away). Vito claimed to have weight problems in the weeks prior to the fight. Since he didn’t have a diet specialist in his team, he didn’t lose weight properly and was weak during the fight. With the years, Maurice Hope proved to be a true champion.

On March 4, 1979 he won the WBC world light middleweight title and held it until May 23, 1981.


No mention of cuts there Elton. And how often would a fight be stopped on cuts with just 15 seconds to go?

But then again you just pull your comments out of your arse don't you?

:D
That's a fine way to be talking to your betters.

The article doesnt tell much-period. Hard to tell exactly what happened but an educated guess would suggest lacerations forced a stoppage.

I've seen Hope and he resembled a punching bag. I have to wonder: were all jr middleweights that slow back then?

Surely you aren't suggesting that you are qualified to make 'an educated guess' are you Reg?

:lol:

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 16:25
by raylawpc
From the AP:

Image

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 21:11
by Collins2000
raylawpc wrote:From the AP:

Image
Thanks, Ray.

I'd still like to see the Boxing News review of the fight. I was always sure Antuerfermo was gassed and was stopped as he was taking shots without anything coming back. I thought any cuts were incidental rather than being the main reason for the stoppage. Of course, I could be wrong. It was a long time ago...

Surely some of the 'historians' in here have access to the relevant copy of Boxing News and can scan it for us???

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 21:58
by Elton John
raylawpc wrote:From the AP:

Image
Thanks Ray. Again, my suspicions proved correct. See that Collins 2000?

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 22:28
by Collins2000
Elton John wrote:
raylawpc wrote:From the AP:

Image
Thanks Ray. Again, my suspicions proved correct. See that Collins 2000?
I'm not convinced yet, Reg.

However, if the Boxing News review says the fight was stopped due to a cut eye, I will be the first to admit you were right and I was wrong.

:TU:

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 17 Dec 2008, 00:34
by raylawpc
Collins2000 wrote:
raylawpc wrote:From the AP:

Image
Thanks, Ray.

I'd still like to see the Boxing News review of the fight. I was always sure Antuerfermo was gassed and was stopped as he was taking shots without anything coming back. I thought any cuts were incidental rather than being the main reason for the stoppage. Of course, I could be wrong. It was a long time ago...

Surely some of the 'historians' in here have access to the relevant copy of Boxing News and can scan it for us???
Can't help you with that. I suggest you PM Frank (kikibalt). He is able to dig up some really obscure items off the internet. Maybe he can help.

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 17 Dec 2008, 01:18
by Elton John
Collins2000 wrote:
Elton John wrote:
raylawpc wrote:From the AP:

Image
Thanks Ray. Again, my suspicions proved correct. See that Collins 2000?
I'm not convinced yet, Reg.

However, if the Boxing News review says the fight was stopped due to a cut eye, I will be the first to admit you were right and I was wrong.

:TU:
Who's Reg? I go by many names but Reg is certainly not one of them.

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 17 Dec 2008, 05:32
by Collins2000
Elton John wrote:
Who's Reg? I go by many names but Reg is certainly not one of them.
Really? I'd have thought you'd have been aware of Elton's real name...

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 17 Dec 2008, 09:53
by Elton John
Collins2000 wrote:
Elton John wrote:
Who's Reg? I go by many names but Reg is certainly not one of them.
Really? I'd have thought you'd have been aware of Elton's real name...
If I liked that name I would be using it wouldn't I? My more recognizable name is how I'd like to be addressed. Thank you

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 17 Dec 2008, 16:30
by Collins2000
Elton John wrote:
Collins2000 wrote:
Elton John wrote:
Who's Reg? I go by many names but Reg is certainly not one of them.
Really? I'd have thought you'd have been aware of Elton's real name...
If I liked that name I would be using it wouldn't I? My more recognizable name is how I'd like to be addressed. Thank you
OK, Reg, I'll remember that in future.

Are you still in contact with Renata?

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 17 Dec 2008, 18:02
by raylawpc
Hey, Collins, you are not one of those guys who still call Muhammad Ali "Cassius Clay" are you? :shame: :shame: :wink: :wink:

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 18 Dec 2008, 19:55
by Collins2000
raylawpc wrote:Hey, Collins, you are not one of those guys who still call Muhammad Ali "Cassius Clay" are you? :shame: :shame: :wink: :wink:
No, I think the only ones left are Terap and bitter old Joe Frazier...

:D

Actually, I think our "Elton John" is giving out more false info. I saw a doco not so long back about the 70's and in it Ringo Starr (os should I say Richard Starkey) was talking about the real Elton John and he referred to him as "Reggie"...

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 30 Jan 2009, 22:00
by Goodnight, Irene
I'm thinking about purchasing Four Kings. Any good?

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 31 Jan 2009, 03:39
by Robinson
GI


I just started reading it. It seems ok, nothing new, so far....

Ill hope to finish it of soon.

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 31 Jan 2009, 16:57
by Arbachakov
Vito was not stopped because of a cut against Hope, he was out on his feet and taking a beating aka Robinson Lamotta...hence his excuses about weightmaking.Pretty sure the boxing news report confirmed as much, but if you were following the BRitish scene at the time you wouldn't really need that confirmation.

Re: New Leonard-Hagler book: "Sorcery at Caesars"

Posted: 31 Jan 2009, 17:52
by Collins2000
Arbachakov wrote:Vito was not stopped because of a cut against Hope, he was out on his feet and taking a beating aka Robinson Lamotta...hence his excuses about weightmaking.Pretty sure the boxing news report confirmed as much, but if you were following the BRitish scene at the time you wouldn't really need that confirmation.
It's always good to have written evidence when 'discussing' this sort of thing with people like dear old Reggie. It's hard to get him to accept he might be wrong.

Several punters in here have claimed to be historians over the years but none seem to have access to the Boxing News report of that fight which would clear things up one way or another.

I always thought I'd read that the fight was stopped as Vito was taking a hammering rather than a cut eye stoppage but I have never seen any footage which means it is hard to disprove Reggie's version of events.