Page 3 of 3
Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story
Posted: 28 Nov 2008, 05:32
by Deserter
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:states wrote:With regards to the photos, there was an apology to Tony in The Independent today. They said it was a mix-up at the photo agency. I can see how it happened, as I imagine Jeffries and Saunders are both in a file entitled 'Boxers:Olympics:2008' And I very much doubt a picture editor knows either of them from Adam.
Mirror did the same. Are they part of the same media group?
They're not part of the same media group, but if it's the fault of the photo agency there's a high chance they're using the same agency.
Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story
Posted: 28 Nov 2008, 07:49
by Abbo
Well a friend of the current Mrs Abbo pays £50pg, so that's £15,000. However, the last time I did coke (which was 2/3 years ago I suppose) it had as much coke in it as a Shandy Bass has got booze.
So I reckon that could be £30k+ in there. Therefore, even less likely be a plant IMHO.
Unless.. it's turf war stuff, so therefore who gives a monkeys whether this batch is his or not.
Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story
Posted: 29 Nov 2008, 11:59
by Gray-Fox
I believe Saunders is innocent.
Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story
Posted: 29 Nov 2008, 12:29
by TerribleTerry
Gray-Fox wrote:I believe Saunders is innocent.
I hope you are right.
Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story
Posted: 29 Nov 2008, 12:41
by Coco
He hasn't been charged anyway