Page 3 of 3

Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division

Posted: 04 Jan 2009, 07:12
by Autobarn
He was so crap in that 1st fight that he just didn't deserve it IMO. Cunningham just doesn't gel well with Wlodarczyk for some reason. No arguments re the 2nd fight though. Wlod looked like he wanted to go home, by the midway point. Thankfully he convinced in the 2nd fight.

Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division

Posted: 04 Jan 2009, 10:16
by dbf
Mosley v wright
Mosley v DLH 2?
Casamayor v Frietas
Corrales V Castillio

Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division

Posted: 04 Jan 2009, 11:12
by stujones
Mosley vs Wright 1 - yes good call I think.
Mosley vs DLH 2 - no, it was at Light Middle - Mosley hadn't properly fought there.
Casamayor vs Freitas - Mayweather was still the champion at the time.
castillo vs corrales - yes.

Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division

Posted: 04 Jan 2009, 12:01
by belowthebelt
[quote="brian13]
If you hold a WBO title and that is the only title you have held you will not be number 2[/quote]
joe calzaghe only had the wbo title for years but i wouldnt put anybody in the rest of that division above him

Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division

Posted: 04 Jan 2009, 13:40
by stujones
I think Ottke should have been ranked about Joe for the most part of their respective reigns, especially when Ottke partially unified.

Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division

Posted: 04 Jan 2009, 19:04
by brian13
belowthebelt wrote:joe calzaghe only had the wbo title for years but i wouldnt put anybody in the rest of that division above him


Lacy was probably put ahead of him and I think Kessler was aswell

Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division

Posted: 28 Feb 2010, 14:27
by lefthook82
Mosley v Mayweather.

Pacman has ony had 1 meaningful fight at Welter

Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division

Posted: 03 Sep 2010, 01:27
by lefthook82
Martinez v Williams 2 ?

Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division

Posted: 22 Nov 2019, 03:46
by lefthook82
One almighty bump

I'll add Taylor v Prograis

Usyk v Gassiev

Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division

Posted: 22 Nov 2019, 04:12
by james5000+
Lol really???

There was a unified champ by the name of Jose Ramirez that can be ranked no lower than 2 but must certainly should be considered no1.

Ramirez will beat those two chaps at the same time

Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division

Posted: 22 Nov 2019, 05:53
by lefthook82
Fair point actually

Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division

Posted: 22 Nov 2019, 06:29
by dbf
Usyk v Gassiev - I think they had to be consensus 1 and 2 at the time.

Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division

Posted: 23 Nov 2019, 10:57
by Trent
Wilder vs fury?

Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division

Posted: 23 Nov 2019, 12:34
by littlepug
Froch v Ward ?

Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division

Posted: 23 Nov 2019, 12:36
by littlepug
Canelo v Golovkin ?

Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division

Posted: 23 Nov 2019, 12:41
by littlepug
Klit v Povetkin

Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division

Posted: 23 Nov 2019, 12:53
by Lenny Cravats
Pretty sad indictment of the sport, this.

Frampton - Santa Cruz?

Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division

Posted: 23 Nov 2019, 15:18
by Cholo_cws
I think only Juan Francisco Estrada v Sor Rungvisai would be the only one in 2019 to date.