Re: Witter v Devon Alexander, WBC Interim
Posted: 13 Jan 2009, 06:24
... and no response to my question.
Maelstrom bt twenty-six KO 1
Maelstrom bt twenty-six KO 1
Precisely. Ingle may have wanted the opponent - but Hennessy would have done the lobbying to get the fight made an eliminator.dbflex wrote:Maelstrom is right. If Ingle had a role, it would have been in helping Hennessy to lobby the WBC for the Interim title bout to take place. They've wanted a final eliminator with Alexander or a Bradley rematch since Witter lost the belt. Ingle's good at his job but would not have 'made' this match in the usual sense.
One would have thought no one would go to any of your bosses rip off shows (( allegedly).boxingchat wrote:One would have thought that the WBC made this fight not John Ingle!
Well, as you well know BC - fighter rankings are hardly independent from the honeyed words of promoters now are they?boxingchat wrote:One would have thought that the WBC made this fight not John Ingle!
Urrrr... isn't that what I have already said a million times on this thread? Read the whole post before submitting BC!boxingchat wrote:One would have thought that the WBC made this fight not John Ingle!
Correct on the former. Arum has really slashed his prices. You can see Mosley v Margarito for $25.DavidPayne wrote:I think as a rule King's shows are cheaper than GBP or Arum. I could be mistaken.