Re: Worst ever World champ?
Posted: 27 Mar 2009, 11:53
I was suprised that Khan said Kotelnik. Kotelnik is not a bad fighter at all and made Witter look foolish at times.
Riddick Blowe wrote:I laughed when Khan said Kotelnik - then got a hard on thinking about what the odds would be for Kotlenik should they ever meet.
Counter-puncher wrote:to me Gairy St Clair stands out from that list as better than the rest of themPill_85 wrote:To me to be the worse you cant have had a sucessfull defence and the title was won very luckly .
Luis Santana
Alex Arther
Erik Akin
Krystoff Wlodzarcyk (i really dont rate this guy)
Darrin Van Horn
Eddie Hopson
Gary St Clair
Malcom Klassen
Maselino Masoe
Javier Casellijo
Sandiego Samiengo
Gavin Rees
Carlos Mausa
Jose Alfaro
Alonso Ratliff
Christian Sanvia
Daniel Londas
Jason Mathews
Micheal Bent
To be honest there is also fighter like Erdei who has a very poor rein as champ unconvincing and against very poor oposition.
But for the absolute worse i thing Santana just edges it from micheal bent
Worse than that, it was a WBU belt!Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:They didn't even have a proper belt when he won it in Bolton. They had a WBO version with WBA taped over the front.banjo wrote:M'Baye wasn't much cop really though was he? He won a title that Hatton vacated and was lucky(IMO) to hang onto it against Kotelnik and then he lost straight after that to Rees. But I still stand by Santana as my pick seeing how he "won" and "defended" his title against Norris and for certain I haven't seen a worse fighter to hold a "major" title in my lifetime.
I wish I was making that up.

Kotelnik would SMASH Amir.Riddick Blowe wrote:I laughed when Khan said Kotelnik - then got a hard on thinking about what the odds would be for Kotlenik should they ever meet.
I did look at the list before i posted it and did think about Castillejo he was a solid euro champ a few years back. I think i kept him due because it was never really a proper world champion in my view. (Reminising about the days where there was only 1 champ)(damn my parents hadnt even met when the WBA and WBC split happened)banjo wrote:I'm suprised Castillejo is on that list, he was(still is infact) quite a handy fighter who although was never good enough to beat the elite certainly wasn't a bad fighter.
Worse person who lived yes hilton could well be put up for thatDaveyH wrote:Steve Little
Dave Hilton
It was actually a WBU Intercontinental belt! There was a pic of MBaye wearing it, complete with masking tape over the word "intercontinental"teddy007 wrote:No wayEmerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:They didn't even have a proper belt when he won it in Bolton. They had a WBO version with WBA taped over the front.banjo wrote:M'Baye wasn't much cop really though was he? He won a title that Hatton vacated and was lucky(IMO) to hang onto it against Kotelnik and then he lost straight after that to Rees. But I still stand by Santana as my pick seeing how he "won" and "defended" his title against Norris and for certain I haven't seen a worse fighter to hold a "major" title in my lifetime.
I wish I was making that up.
But he didn't, so he didn't. Therefore the better man won.Horse wrote:You were impressed by that? Rees would have beaten him if he had kept his hands up.Dioufy wrote:Only seen Kotelnik fight once against Rees - I was impressed.
Off the top of my head, all the guys in bold made successful defences. Catillejo was even a two or three-time champion.Pill_85 wrote:To me to be the worse you cant have had a sucessfull defence and the title was won very luckly .
Luis Santana
Alex Arther
Erik Akin
Krystoff Wlodzarcyk (i really dont rate this guy)
Darrin Van Horn Eddie Hopson
Gary St Clair
Malcom Klassen
Maselino Masoe
Javier CasellijoSandiego Samiengo
Gavin Rees
Carlos Mausa
Jose Alfaro
Alonso Ratliff
Christian Sanvia
Daniel Londas
Jason Mathews
Micheal Bent
McCall, Coetzee, Bugner, Tillis, Truth Williamsforcefraser wrote:Bruno.
He never beat a decent boxer in his pro career.
What is your point? I didn't say otherwise, did I?oliverfennell wrote:But he didn't, so he didn't. Therefore the better man won.Horse wrote:You were impressed by that? Rees would have beaten him if he had kept his hands up.
Fair enough, the choice of the word decent was perhaps wrong. It just seemed with Bruno whenever he stepped up a level he got done. In both the Lewis and Witherspoon fights he was winning until it fell apart (Smith as well)oliverfennell wrote:McCall, Coetzee, Bugner, Tillis, Truth Williamsforcefraser wrote:Bruno.
He never beat a decent boxer in his pro career.
Admittedly not A-listers, but you can't say he NEVER beat a decent boxer. Even stepping down a level, Bruno dealt with the likes of Ekland, Ribalta, Ferguson very impressively. I remember Bruno-Ferguson being maligned as a mismatch after the KO1, but Ferguson took almost everyone the distance before and since.
Luis is the worst champ ever...Terry D wrote:Luis' defence was another DQ win over Norris, it hardly sets him apart, as a pedant yes he did make a defence, in the real world he was an awful champ. BM ran a photo on its front inside page ripping the piss out of his swan dive in fight II.oliverfennell wrote:Off the top of my head, all the guys in bold made successful defences. Catillejo was even a two or three-time champion.Pill_85 wrote:To me to be the worse you cant have had a sucessfull defence and the title was won very luckly .
Luis Santana
Alex Arther
Erik Akin
Krystoff Wlodzarcyk (i really dont rate this guy)
Darrin Van Horn Eddie Hopson
Gary St Clair
Malcom Klassen
Maselino Masoe
Javier CasellijoSandiego Samiengo
Gavin Rees
Carlos Mausa
Jose Alfaro
Alonso Ratliff
Christian Sanvia
Daniel Londas
Jason Mathews
Micheal Bent