Page 22 of 28
Re: john fury
Posted: 10 Sep 2020, 02:00
by jamesmcdonnell
Cyclops wrote: ↑09 Sep 2020, 13:30
Coco wrote: ↑08 Sep 2020, 16:24
margaret thatcher wrote: ↑08 Sep 2020, 15:30
Nah, Homi is HomicideHenry, KronkPride is a different guy who is crazier and less amusing (giant blocks of text hurt his score) , though still amusing
I genuinely thought they were the same
Kronkpride's been around forever. He was either doing his weird numerology/spelling super-posts or bigging up a very overweight boxer called, I think, Chaucey Welliver. He does videos as well although I've never watched one.
I guess they're both very right wing Christian types, but Henry's more of a guy who has social problems but isn't unintelligent because he writes quite well, whereas Kronkpride seems sectionable.
That numerology shit was batshit.
I can't believe people treat it like it's an actual science.
Re: john fury
Posted: 10 Sep 2020, 05:08
by Cyclops
On topic (very much so) I remember replying to a thread that Henry started asking whether anybody had read the interview with John Fury in Boxing News or Boxing Monthly, I forget which one but one of the Brit magazines. Henry said it was too expensive to get but he was interested to see if John had said anything good. I couldn't resist it and, in telling Rufus some of John's gems I also slipped in how surprised I was that John was so vocal in his support for Jeremy Corbyn. Henry (as well as, as I recall, coneye, who wrote a long post about how he wasn't surprised, confirming my belief that he bases most of his posts on his imagination) bought it hook, line and sinker and completely threw John under the bus and became a far less vocal supporter of Tyson.
I might have admitted that before, but I think it's am amazing how much effort he spent defending John Fury for gouging out someone's eye and then, based on a lie I told as a joke (an obvious one, I thought), completely disowns the bloke because he might be a bit left wing.
Re: john fury
Posted: 10 Sep 2020, 05:46
by Counter-puncher
Cyclops wrote: ↑10 Sep 2020, 05:08
On topic (very much so) I remember replying to a thread that Henry started asking whether anybody had read the interview with John Fury in Boxing News or Boxing Monthly, I forget which one but one of the Brit magazines. Henry said it was too expensive to get but he was interested to see if John had said anything good.
I couldn't resist it and, in telling Rufus some of John's gems I also slipped in how surprised I was that John was so vocal in his support for Jeremy Corbyn. Henry (as well as, as I recall, coneye, who wrote a long post about how he wasn't surprised, confirming my belief that he bases most of his posts on his imagination) bought it hook, line and sinker and completely threw John under the bus and became a far less vocal supporter of Tyson.
I might have admitted that before, but I think it's am amazing how much effort he spent defending John Fury for gouging out someone's eye and then, based on a lie I told as a joke (an obvious one, I thought), completely disowns the bloke because he might be a bit left wing.

i remember that
Re: john fury
Posted: 10 Sep 2020, 06:56
by Cyclops
Counter-puncher wrote: ↑10 Sep 2020, 05:46
Cyclops wrote: ↑10 Sep 2020, 05:08
On topic (very much so) I remember replying to a thread that Henry started asking whether anybody had read the interview with John Fury in Boxing News or Boxing Monthly, I forget which one but one of the Brit magazines. Henry said it was too expensive to get but he was interested to see if John had said anything good.
I couldn't resist it and, in telling Rufus some of John's gems I also slipped in how surprised I was that John was so vocal in his support for Jeremy Corbyn. Henry (as well as, as I recall, coneye, who wrote a long post about how he wasn't surprised, confirming my belief that he bases most of his posts on his imagination) bought it hook, line and sinker and completely threw John under the bus and became a far less vocal supporter of Tyson.
I might have admitted that before, but I think it's am amazing how much effort he spent defending John Fury for gouging out someone's eye and then, based on a lie I told as a joke (an obvious one, I thought), completely disowns the bloke because he might be a bit left wing.

i remember that
Found it. It's such an obvious joke but it makes Henry go mental.
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=231255&hilit=John+ ... emy+corbyn
Re: john fury
Posted: 10 Sep 2020, 08:26
by Boxerbeetle
Cyclops wrote: ↑10 Sep 2020, 06:56
Counter-puncher wrote: ↑10 Sep 2020, 05:46
Cyclops wrote: ↑10 Sep 2020, 05:08
On topic (very much so) I remember replying to a thread that Henry started asking whether anybody had read the interview with John Fury in Boxing News or Boxing Monthly, I forget which one but one of the Brit magazines. Henry said it was too expensive to get but he was interested to see if John had said anything good.
I couldn't resist it and, in telling Rufus some of John's gems I also slipped in how surprised I was that John was so vocal in his support for Jeremy Corbyn. Henry (as well as, as I recall, coneye, who wrote a long post about how he wasn't surprised, confirming my belief that he bases most of his posts on his imagination) bought it hook, line and sinker and completely threw John under the bus and became a far less vocal supporter of Tyson.
I might have admitted that before, but I think it's am amazing how much effort he spent defending John Fury for gouging out someone's eye and then, based on a lie I told as a joke (an obvious one, I thought), completely disowns the bloke because he might be a bit left wing.

i remember that
Found it. It's such an obvious joke but it makes Henry go mental.
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=231255&hilit=John+ ... emy+corbyn

I don’t think I ever read that thread, top quality
Edit: actually, on further investigation it looks like I commented on it a few times

Those Henry religious rants do tend to blur into one.
Re: john fury
Posted: 10 Sep 2020, 08:34
by margaret thatcher
Any gems you guys want to post here, for someone who may or may not be banned from off topic (asking for a friend)
i do love myself a good homi meltdown, i wish he would come back, at his best he was the most amusing poster here

Re: john fury
Posted: 10 Sep 2020, 18:04
by coneye
Cyclops wrote: ↑10 Sep 2020, 05:08
On topic (very much so) I remember replying to a thread that Henry started asking whether anybody had read the interview with John Fury in Boxing News or Boxing Monthly, I forget which one but one of the Brit magazines. Henry said it was too expensive to get but he was interested to see if John had said anything good. I couldn't resist it and, in telling Rufus some of John's gems I also slipped in how surprised I was that John was so vocal in his support for Jeremy Corbyn. Henry (as well as, as I recall, coneye, who wrote a long post about how he wasn't surprised, confirming my belief that he bases most of his posts on his imagination) bought it hook, line and sinker and completely threw John under the bus and became a far less vocal supporter of Tyson.
I might have admitted that before, but I think it's am amazing how much effort he spent defending John Fury for gouging out someone's eye and then, based on a lie I told as a joke (an obvious one, I thought), completely disowns the bloke because he might be a bit left wing.
I couldn't resist it and, in telling Rufus some of John's gems I also slipped in how surprised I was that John was so vocal in his support for Jeremy Corbyn. Henry (as well as, as I recall, coneye, who wrote a long post about how he wasn't surprised,
So you bullshit in a post , and people believe it , so what is it there ignorant , or your a liar , personaly i take things at face value and don't question everything said , simply because i can't be arsed once found out there liars just don't respond to them , , and i believe this is my LONG POST .
Quote,,,i was'nt He seems to see himself has Irish ,, But realisticly , who the hell , would take much notice of what John or Tyson think about politics , , not excatly Rhode scholars are they. They speak from there heart not there Brain Un quote
Jeez that was exceptionaly long , and i do believe it would be true , The Furys do see themselves has Irishmen , there not excatly Rhode scholars either ,,,, So what i gather you say you bullshitted,, a lie which i might add that was not totally unbelievable , it would'nt suprise me at all if John was a supporter of Corbyn and then want to have a go at someone for believing it ,, you sir are a complete FOOKWIT.
Re: john fury
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 06:34
by Cyclops
coneye wrote: ↑11 Jun 2019, 09:41
jamamb wrote: ↑11 Jun 2019, 03:28
ya, was surprised to see big john so pro corbyn, wasnt expecting that tbh
I was'nt He seems to see himself has Irish ,, But realisticly , who the hell , would take much notice of what John or Tyson think about politics , , not excatly Rhode scholars are they. They speak from there heart not there Brain
So, there you see Jamamb playing along with the joke, enjoying the windup too (I didn't ask him to do that) and then YOU chime in basically writing like you read the article too.
That's quite funny, I think.
Yeah, your post wasn't as long as I remembered it. Chill out, mate.
Re: john fury
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 06:57
by mickey1975
He doesn’t see himself as fully Irish. He’s more than proud of his British and Irish roots.
Re: john fury
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 07:43
by coneye
Cyclops wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 06:34
coneye wrote: ↑11 Jun 2019, 09:41
jamamb wrote: ↑11 Jun 2019, 03:28
ya, was surprised to see big john so pro corbyn, wasnt expecting that tbh
I was'nt He seems to see himself has Irish ,, But realisticly , who the hell , would take much notice of what John or Tyson think about politics , , not excatly Rhode scholars are they. They speak from there heart not there Brain
So, there you see Jamamb playing along with the joke, enjoying the windup too (I didn't ask him to do that) and then YOU chime in basically writing like you read the article too.
That's quite funny, I think.
Yeah, your post wasn't as long as I remembered it. Chill out, mate.
Your just a foooking idiot mate ,, , You said , YOU WERE SUPRISED JOHN WAS VOCAL IN SUPPORT OF CORBYN ,,, I and probably others, took you at your word and responded ,,, Now you think your a comedian because you were a LIAR and try to put others down , I responded to a post you put up , and said it did,nt suprise me , given i've heard John talk about irish heritage before . . had a father in law like you , trouble causing bastard , who would always say its only a nobble when he was pulled up , he too would tell Porkys and then sit back thinking other peoples reactions were funny ,, UNTIL someone gave him a crack for his wack .. I'll tell you a joke , The internet is full of wankers , who get away with trying to belittle others , because they know theres no comeback , and funny thing with this joke i think your one of them ,, your just a fookwit
Re: john fury
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 07:58
by coneye
mickey1975 wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 06:57
He doesn’t see himself as fully Irish. He’s more than proud of his British and Irish roots.
I've heard him refer to his Irish background on a few occasions , nothing wrong with that , But i do know quite a few lads who are English born , or Australian born with Irish background , who are very very involved with Irish history and politics , I'm not saying John said anyhting ,or is involved with views one way or the other Billy Liar alias Cyclops said that ,, IJUST WOULD NOT BE SUPRISED IF jOHN TOOK A POLITICAL LEANING EITHER WAY , i've met lots of people with Irish backgrounds who are very passionate about it . Personaly i'm from Irish stock , both parents , and i could'nt give a monkeys about it all , because I'm not Irish , i am an expat Englishman
Re: john fury
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 08:00
by Fray Bentos
Didn't Tyson Fury box for Ireland and boxed for Holy Family BC in Belfast? I remember reading that somewhere unless my mind is playing tricks.

Re: john fury
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 08:05
by mickey1975
Fray Bentos wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 08:00
Didn't Tyson Fury box for Ireland and boxed for Holy Family BC in Belfast? I remember reading that somewhere unless my mind is playing tricks.
He tried to for the 2008 Olympic Games, because Price was going.
He classes himself as half and half.
Re: john fury
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 08:12
by Fray Bentos
mickey1975 wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 08:05
Fray Bentos wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 08:00
Didn't Tyson Fury box for Ireland and boxed for Holy Family BC in Belfast? I remember reading that somewhere unless my mind is playing tricks.
He tried to for the 2008 Olympic Games, because Price was going.
He classes himself as half and half.
Which is fair enough.
Norman Tebbit's 'cricket test' is real. I know from personal experience.

Re: john fury
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 08:14
by mickey1975
Fray Bentos wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 08:12
mickey1975 wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 08:05
Fray Bentos wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 08:00
Didn't Tyson Fury box for Ireland and boxed for Holy Family BC in Belfast? I remember reading that somewhere unless my mind is playing tricks.
He tried to for the 2008 Olympic Games, because Price was going.
He classes himself as half and half.
Which is fair enough.
Norman Tebbit's 'cricket test' is real. I know from personal experience.
He may have done, but was with Steve Egan.
Re: john fury
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 08:14
by Fray Bentos
Saying that, there are a ton of boxing clubs in the whole of Ireland, why Holy Family in Belfast?
Re: john fury
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 08:17
by mickey1975
Actually no, I don’t know him but would guess he feels more Romany than Irish. The way he speaks, etc. They’re very different. He tried doing the back door like Khan did in 2004.
Re: john fury
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 08:18
by mickey1975
Fray Bentos wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 08:14
Saying that, there are a ton of boxing clubs in the whole of Ireland, why Holy Family in Belfast?
It’s a republican gym.
Re: john fury
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 08:19
by Cyclops
coneye wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 07:43
Cyclops wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 06:34
coneye wrote: ↑11 Jun 2019, 09:41
I was'nt He seems to see himself has Irish ,, But realisticly , who the hell , would take much notice of what John or Tyson think about politics , , not excatly Rhode scholars are they. They speak from there heart not there Brain
So, there you see Jamamb playing along with the joke, enjoying the windup too (I didn't ask him to do that) and then YOU chime in basically writing like you read the article too.
That's quite funny, I think.
Yeah, your post wasn't as long as I remembered it. Chill out, mate.
Your just a foooking idiot mate ,, , You said , YOU WERE SUPRISED JOHN WAS VOCAL IN SUPPORT OF CORBYN ,,, I and probably others, took you at your word and responded ,,, Now you think your a comedian because you were a LIAR and try to put others down , I responded to a post you put up , and said it did,nt suprise me , given i've heard John talk about irish heritage before . . had a father in law like you , trouble causing bastard , who would always say its only a nobble when he was pulled up , he too would tell Porkys and then sit back thinking other peoples reactions were funny ,, UNTIL someone gave him a crack for his wack .. I'll tell you a joke , The internet is full of wankers , who get away with trying to belittle others , because they know theres no comeback , and funny thing with this joke i think your one of them ,, your just a fookwit
I see you've found your spellcheck.
EDIT: I'm going to take that back, because now I'm going as low as you. You seem to be saying that if I was in front of you you'd kick my head in, and for what? Because of a wind up? I've spent my whole life dealing with violent bullies, murderers, armed robbers, rapists, whatever you like, and I've always had a smart mouth on me. Funnily enough, I'm still standing.
Take a joke, Coneye.
Re: john fury
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 08:21
by Fray Bentos
mickey1975 wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 08:18
Fray Bentos wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 08:14
Saying that, there are a ton of boxing clubs in the whole of Ireland, why Holy Family in Belfast?
It’s a republican gym.
I know, that's quite a stark choice to make when he could have gone to Dublin and boxed for a club there without the political ramifications.
Saying that, Holy Family is a great boxing club with a fine tradition.
![[icon_notworthy.gif] :bow:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
Re: john fury
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 08:27
by coneye
Cyclops wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 08:19
coneye wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 07:43
Cyclops wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 06:34
So, there you see Jamamb playing along with the joke, enjoying the windup too (I didn't ask him to do that) and then YOU chime in basically writing like you read the article too.
That's quite funny, I think.
Yeah, your post wasn't as long as I remembered it. Chill out, mate.
Your just a foooking idiot mate ,, , You said , YOU WERE SUPRISED JOHN WAS VOCAL IN SUPPORT OF CORBYN ,,, I and probably others, took you at your word and responded ,,, Now you think your a comedian because you were a LIAR and try to put others down , I responded to a post you put up , and said it did,nt suprise me , given i've heard John talk about irish heritage before . . had a father in law like you , trouble causing bastard , who would always say its only a nobble when he was pulled up , he too would tell Porkys and then sit back thinking other peoples reactions were funny ,, UNTIL someone gave him a crack for his wack .. I'll tell you a joke , The internet is full of wankers , who get away with trying to belittle others , because they know theres no comeback , and funny thing with this joke i think your one of them ,, your just a fookwit
I see you've found your spellcheck.
Not at all , my spellings still has bad has it was when i left school at 13 ,,, Thing is though i've always known how to spell LIAR and IDIOT ,, they always seem to go hand in hand easy to remember , So just Foook right off Billy Liar and don't bother answering again
Re: john fury
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 08:32
by Cyclops
coneye wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 08:27
Cyclops wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 08:19
coneye wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 07:43
Your just a foooking idiot mate ,, , You said , YOU WERE SUPRISED JOHN WAS VOCAL IN SUPPORT OF CORBYN ,,, I and probably others, took you at your word and responded ,,, Now you think your a comedian because you were a LIAR and try to put others down , I responded to a post you put up , and said it did,nt suprise me , given i've heard John talk about irish heritage before . . had a father in law like you , trouble causing bastard , who would always say its only a nobble when he was pulled up , he too would tell Porkys and then sit back thinking other peoples reactions were funny ,, UNTIL someone gave him a crack for his wack .. I'll tell you a joke , The internet is full of wankers , who get away with trying to belittle others , because they know theres no comeback , and funny thing with this joke i think your one of them ,, your just a fookwit
I see you've found your spellcheck.
Not at all , my spellings still has bad has it was when i left school at 13 ,,, Thing is though i've always known how to spell LIAR and IDIOT ,, they always seem to go hand in hand easy to remember , So just Foook right off Billy Liar and don't bother answering again
See the response above.
Re: john fury
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 08:49
by cmonyouguys
mickey1975 wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 08:17
Actually no, I don’t know him but would guess he feels more Romany than Irish. The way he speaks, etc. They’re very different. He tried doing the back door like Khan did in 2004.
Why would he feel more Romany than Irish when he's not Romany at all?
His Irish olympic plans fell through because he couldn't find record of his father's birth in Ireland. I'm not sure why it had to be his dad seeing as his mother was supposedly born in Belfast. I wouldn't be surprised if neither were born in Ireland to be honest.
Re: john fury
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 08:51
by coneye
Cyclops wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 08:19
coneye wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 07:43
Cyclops wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 06:34
So, there you see Jamamb playing along with the joke, enjoying the windup too (I didn't ask him to do that) and then YOU chime in basically writing like you read the article too.
That's quite funny, I think.
Yeah, your post wasn't as long as I remembered it. Chill out, mate.
Your just a foooking idiot mate ,, , You said , YOU WERE SUPRISED JOHN WAS VOCAL IN SUPPORT OF CORBYN ,,, I and probably others, took you at your word and responded ,,, Now you think your a comedian because you were a LIAR and try to put others down , I responded to a post you put up , and said it did,nt suprise me , given i've heard John talk about irish heritage before . . had a father in law like you , trouble causing bastard , who would always say its only a nobble when he was pulled up , he too would tell Porkys and then sit back thinking other peoples reactions were funny ,, UNTIL someone gave him a crack for his wack .. I'll tell you a joke , The internet is full of wankers , who get away with trying to belittle others , because they know theres no comeback , and funny thing with this joke i think your one of them ,, your just a fookwit
I see you've found your spellcheck.
EDIT: I'm going to take that back, because now I'm going as low as you. You seem to be saying that if I was in front of you you'd kick my head in, and for what? Because of a wind up? I've spent my whole life dealing with violent bullies, murderers, armed robbers, rapists, whatever you like, and I've always had a smart mouth on me. Funnily enough, I'm still standing.
Take a joke, Coneye.
When you try to belittle people its not a joke , its a form of bullying , and i hate bullys , so yes if you were in front of me , I would take a deep breath , suck it in , and then put into action something my first ever trainer told me , he said a good left hook is a great equaliser , and after that i would say to you , Take a Joke ,, smart ass . your smart mouth i'm afraid just would'nt wash with me , so i suppose i'm lucky we are not facing each other , because a lifetime of experience has taught me ,, smart mouths , think its ok to belittle and bully others with there tongue , but are the first to cry if they get a crack across the kisser , , now thats the end of this for me ,... Go rope someone else in with lying posts , then come back months later to tell everyone how cool you are cos your a smart ass .
Re: john fury
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 08:56
by watsupdoc87
cmonyouguys wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 08:49
mickey1975 wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 08:17
Actually no, I don’t know him but would guess he feels more Romany than Irish. The way he speaks, etc. They’re very different. He tried doing the back door like Khan did in 2004.
Why would he feel more Romany than Irish when he's not Romany at all?
His Irish olympic plans fell through because he couldn't find record of his father's birth in Ireland. I'm not sure why it had to be his dad seeing as his mother was supposedly born in Belfast. I wouldn't be surprised if neither were born in Ireland to be honest.
Historically travellers didn't get birth certs . Only changing recently enough
