BoxRec

keithmoonhangover wrote:Price is one inch shorter, but hits harder. Fury ain't a knockout artist Horse.

He's got a 72% stoppage rate.

Horse wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:Price is one inch shorter, but hits harder. Fury ain't a knockout artist Horse.

He's got a 72% stoppage rate.

Martin had a 88% Knockout ratio.

Horse wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:Price is one inch shorter, but hits harder. Fury ain't a knockout artist Horse.

He's got a 72% stoppage rate.

Horse, do you think you are biased towards Fury?

lefty wrote:Martin had a 88% Knockout ratio.

Against much inferior opposition.

Horse wrote:

lefty wrote:Martin had a 88% Knockout ratio.

Against much inferior opposition.

Would you say that Hughie Fury hits hard for his size?

lefty wrote: Stop being a pedantic knobhead, Horse.

Christ, that's wishful thinking.

states wrote:

lefty wrote: Stop being a pedantic knobhead, Horse.

Christ, that's wishful thinking.

lefty wrote:Would you say that Hughie Fury hits hard for his size?

No.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Horse wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:Price is one inch shorter, but hits harder. Fury ain't a knockout artist Horse.

He's got a 72% stoppage rate.

Horse, do you think you are biased towards Fury?

Whether he thinks so or not he obviously is.

Horse wrote:

lefty wrote:Would you say that Hughie Fury hits hard for his size?

No.

Well atleast you admit that.

Mother of god, the hapless bum that is Malik Scott next ? Let's just fast forward straight past that first round knockout shall we

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Horse wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:Price is one inch shorter, but hits harder. Fury ain't a knockout artist Horse.

He's got a 72% stoppage rate.

Horse, do you think you are biased towards Fury?

Shock horror , never !

MightyWarrior wrote:Mother of god, the hapless bum that is Malik Scott next ? Let's just fast forward straight past that first round knockout shall we

Who said this?

lefty wrote:

states wrote:

lefty wrote: Stop being a pedantic knobhead, Horse.

Christ, that's wishful thinking.

gilgamesh wrote:

MightyWarrior wrote:Mother of god, the hapless bum that is Malik Scott next ? Let's just fast forward straight past that first round knockout shall we

Who said this?

mightywarrior did

rd350lc wrote:

gilgamesh wrote:

MightyWarrior wrote:Mother of god, the hapless bum that is Malik Scott next ? Let's just fast forward straight past that first round knockout shall we

Who said this?

mightywarrior did

Scott on Twitter apparently

Please not Scott

What's the point of Scott?

is he the IBF mandatory or something? Other than that I can't imagine why he'd possibly be considered for any reason.

crusader wrote:Please not Scott

I'd bet heavily on a 1st round stoppage for Joshua.

Hearn will want the hands down ( literally ) easiest of defences first, and whichever bum he digs up, he'll justify it with "well, it's his first defence isn't it.." And none of the clueless casuals will be able to tell the difference anyway, so of course he is going to go with a chinless wonder like malik Scott, who will go down faster than Bruce Seldon on a banana skin

lefty wrote:

crusader wrote:Please not Scott

I'd bet heavily on a 1st round stoppage for Joshua.

Hard to imagine it going any other way.

gilgamesh wrote:is he the IBF mandatory or something? Other than that I can't imagine why he'd possibly be considered for any reason.

Because he's cheap, will come over talking a good game, then fall over in the first round. Perfect easy opponent for a first defence.

MightyWarrior wrote:Hearn will want the hands down ( literally ) easiest of defences first, and whichever bum he digs up, he'll justify it with "well, it's his first defence isn't it.." And none of the clueless casuals will be able to tell the difference anyway, so of course he is going to go with a chinless wonder like malik Scott, who will go down faster than Bruce Seldon on a banana skin

Hearn should want to help Joshua get some half decent experience pretty quickly.

Joshua is still a novice and he could end up out of his depth pretty quickly if they are complacent.

expe wrote:

gilgamesh wrote:is he the IBF mandatory or something? Other than that I can't imagine why he'd possibly be considered for any reason.

Because he's cheap, will come over talking a good game, then fall over in the first round. Perfect easy opponent for a first defence.

Still don't know why you'd want a guy that lost in such a fashion in his biggest fight that at least half the people that saw it think he just took a dive.