Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23015
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by mickey1975 »

Ezzard wrote:Despite it being close it kind of feels like a worse result than maybe it should.

Kov winning would have been a shot in the arm for a more entertaining style of boxing. Instead it's Ward and his awful methods that have been rewarded. I'm surprised at how disappointed I am.

UFC seems to get more mainstream column inches...and boxing just anointed another guy guaranteed to turn off any news fans tuning in.
UFC gets nowhere near the coverage boxing gets in the uk.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32853
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Now the dust has settled a bit, I'm just glad we got to see 2 genuine elite prime guys actually fight each other. Big credit to Ward for stepping up to the plate, unlike some (ahem, Stevenson).
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by Counter-puncher »

Boxerbeetle wrote:Now the dust has settled a bit, I'm just glad we got to see 2 genuine elite prime guys actually fight each other. Big credit to Ward for stepping up to the plate, unlike some (ahem, Stevenson).
:TU:
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by lefty »

Ian1973 wrote:
Horse wrote:
lillywhite14 wrote:He's terrible. Talks for the sake of it to fill what he perceives to be 'dead air' and then once in a mindset, won't deviate for anyone or anything.
Adam Smith is the worst commentator I've heard.

Nick Halling got a lot of stick, but he talked far less rubbish than Smith and he seemed to wield less influence on the other commentators than Smith does.

When Smith is talking his nonsense the other commentators seem obliged to follow his lead
.

This. Plus the fact that an American is on the commentary team you get the feeling the others feel uncomfortable about criticising the American fighter.

Malignaggi talked rubbish all night.
Will agree to disagree.
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by Ricky_ »

Ezzard wrote:It's fine to have it either way. It's not fine to spend the whole fight from round 3 onwards talking one guy up when you admit that the rounds are close. It's not the first time...

Sky have been doing this for fornicating years. They make their mind up before the fight then when the guy they picked does some good work the bias really kicks in.

I remember one instance late on when Ward forearm pushed Kovalev under the top rope and Adam Smith went bezerk about how Ward was now the one coming forward.... what a moron.

They also scored Ward 10-9 in round 10 because they completely ignored a series of hard clean punches landed by Kovalev in the middle of the round.

The commentry and punditry was piss poor last night.
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

Boxerbeetle wrote:Now the dust has settled a bit, I'm just glad we got to see 2 genuine elite prime guys actually fight each other. Big credit to Ward for stepping up to the plate, unlike some (ahem, Stevenson).
stevenson has been like the forgotten man just recently.

it couldn't have happened to a nicer fella. :OhYes:
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by lillywhite14 »

Ezzard wrote:Despite it being close it kind of feels like a worse result than maybe it should.

Kov winning would have been a shot in the arm for a more entertaining style of boxing. Instead it's Ward and his awful methods that have been rewarded. I'm surprised at how disappointed I am.

UFC seems to get more mainstream column inches...and boxing just anointed another guy guaranteed to turn off any news fans tuning in.
It really doesn't get more column inches. The monday after mr hype won his second belt, BBC breakfast didn't even run a story on it during their sport section, whereas they covered show jumping amongst other things. It didn't exactly dominate the papers either, and this from an Irish fighter too.

I enjoyed last nights fight. I prefer to watch a master of his art as opposed to the jack of all trades ( which I do appreciate absolutely )
To think people cream themselves over McGregors hands...last night showed just how far off the elite 'strikers' ( with hands at least ) he really is. Wards checkhooks were beautiful
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by Covfefe »

He wouldn't make European level boxing never mind championship level.
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by lillywhite14 »

billy nelson wrote:For once I thought the scores where spot on
:TU:

I was pleased to finally have what seemed a fair decision called for a very close fight.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11181
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by Ezzard »

You and I will watch boxing no matter what. But I don't now anyone under 18 who prefers boxing to UFC. Too many Wards for them to care. Too many Mayweather-Pac Man superfights.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23114
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by handsofstone »

Can't remember Kovalev landing a meaningful shot in the second half of the fight,Ward was guilty of spoiling but he was also the only guy landing,I'm surprised so many people thought Kovalev won TBH
Vincent stevenson
Super Middleweight
Posts: 154
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 11:15

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by Vincent stevenson »

I personally thought kovalev won very clearly . I believe that he was the victim of his own success early on . And by that I mean because he won the early rounds convincingly in the latter part of the fight the rounds were a bit closer but there was only one boxer winning these close rounds ( kovalev ) . But because ward was more competitive in these rounds maybe led the judges to believe he was winning them when in fact he was only getting beat up a little less .
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11181
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by Ezzard »

Vincent stevenson wrote:I personally thought kovalev won very clearly . I believe that he was the victim of his own success early on . And by that I mean because he won the early rounds convincingly in the latter part of the fight the rounds were a bit closer but there was only one boxer winning these close rounds ( kovalev ) . But because ward was more competitive in these rounds maybe led the judges to believe he was winning them when in fact he was only getting beat up a little less .
Kind of feel there is something to what you say.
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by lillywhite14 »

Ezzard wrote:You and I will watch boxing no matter what. But I don't now anyone under 18 who prefers boxing to UFC. Too many Wards for them to care. Too many Mayweather-Pac Man superfights.
Those of that age I do know who prefer it, box themselves so that kind of influences it I guess!

I'd say from my experience that the casual UFC fan is about as casual a sports fan there is. 'See Conor's post fight interview? Almost as on point as his suit and Bentley pics from the day before...oh and that beard' It's very, shall we say, 'bro'?

Having said that I've started to take more interest. I enjoyed the big card last weekend, well what I see of it. Was entertaining. I like the mix of styles, it's a great idea really. Just lacks substance imo.
Last edited by lillywhite14 on 20 Nov 2016, 15:35, edited 1 time in total.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32853
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by Boxerbeetle »

handsofstone wrote:Can't remember Kovalev landing a meaningful shot in the second half of the fight,Ward was guilty of spoiling but he was also the only guy landing,I'm surprised so many people thought Kovalev won TBH
Same here. I think some people are just looking at aggression and not much else.
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by lillywhite14 »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
handsofstone wrote:Can't remember Kovalev landing a meaningful shot in the second half of the fight,Ward was guilty of spoiling but he was also the only guy landing,I'm surprised so many people thought Kovalev won TBH
Same here. I think some people are just looking at aggression and not much else.
I'd say Ward comfortably outlanded him from round 5 onwards. Not that punches landed means eff all really!

It was as tight as a nuns chuff. Let's just hope the rematch gets done
Vincent stevenson
Super Middleweight
Posts: 154
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 11:15

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by Vincent stevenson »

Ward is a product of the worst scoring system in amateur boxing history where 3 of the 5 judges had to press within a second of each other to register a point . It produced dreadful top level amateur boxing that was more akin to sword fencing and has subsequently been changed . Ward still looks for one shot then tries to hold or spoil. But this is pro boxing where aggression and forcing the fight should be major factors . And didn't you have to really beat the champion to take his title ? Not just jab and grab
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32853
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Vincent stevenson wrote:Ward is a product of the worst scoring system in amateur boxing history where 3 of the 5 judges had to press within a second of each other to register a point . It produced dreadful top level amateur boxing that was more akin to sword fencing and has subsequently been changed . Ward still looks for one shot then tries to hold or spoil. But this is pro boxing where aggression and forcing the fight should be major factors . And didn't you have to really beat the champion to take his title ? Not just jab and grab
If aggression and forcing the fight were the only major scoring factors, Provodnikov would be a P4P great.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Vincent stevenson wrote:Ward is a product of the worst scoring system in amateur boxing history where 3 of the 5 judges had to press within a second of each other to register a point . It produced dreadful top level amateur boxing that was more akin to sword fencing and has subsequently been changed . Ward still looks for one shot then tries to hold or spoil. But this is pro boxing where aggression and forcing the fight should be major factors . And didn't you have to really beat the champion to take his title ? Not just jab and grab

No, you don't, that's bullshit, people trot this line out again and again, as if you should have to do something extra to take the belt from the champ. There's a scoring system, you box to the rules, you win enough rounds, you win, you take the belt home.

If that produces results people don't like, that's a shame, but Ward is fighting to the code of the sport he competes in, it's not some sort of moral battleground.
Vincent stevenson
Super Middleweight
Posts: 154
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 11:15

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by Vincent stevenson »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Vincent stevenson wrote:Ward is a product of the worst scoring system in amateur boxing history where 3 of the 5 judges had to press within a second of each other to register a point . It produced dreadful top level amateur boxing that was more akin to sword fencing and has subsequently been changed . Ward still looks for one shot then tries to hold or spoil. But this is pro boxing where aggression and forcing the fight should be major factors . And didn't you have to really beat the champion to take his title ? Not just jab and grab

No, you don't, that's bullshit, people trot this line out again and again, as if you should have to do something extra to take the belt from the champ. There's a scoring system, you box to the rules, you win enough rounds, you win, you take the belt home.

If that produces results people don't like, that's a shame, but Ward is fighting to the code of the sport he competes in, it's not some sort of moral battleground.
He's still boxing like an amateur and it's totally different and should be scored so . You're right there is a scoring system in place and a factor of it is is aggression
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by Covfefe »

Vincent stevenson wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Vincent stevenson wrote:Ward is a product of the worst scoring system in amateur boxing history where 3 of the 5 judges had to press within a second of each other to register a point . It produced dreadful top level amateur boxing that was more akin to sword fencing and has subsequently been changed . Ward still looks for one shot then tries to hold or spoil. But this is pro boxing where aggression and forcing the fight should be major factors . And didn't you have to really beat the champion to take his title ? Not just jab and grab

No, you don't, that's bullshit, people trot this line out again and again, as if you should have to do something extra to take the belt from the champ. There's a scoring system, you box to the rules, you win enough rounds, you win, you take the belt home.

If that produces results people don't like, that's a shame, but Ward is fighting to the code of the sport he competes in, it's not some sort of moral battleground.
He's still boxing like an amateur and it's totally different and should be scored so . You're right there is a scoring system in place and a factor of it is is aggression
No it's not. It's effective aggression. Coming forward and missing your punches doesn't deserve to be scored whether you're pushing the fight or not.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16939
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by keithmoonhangover »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Vincent stevenson wrote:Ward is a product of the worst scoring system in amateur boxing history where 3 of the 5 judges had to press within a second of each other to register a point . It produced dreadful top level amateur boxing that was more akin to sword fencing and has subsequently been changed . Ward still looks for one shot then tries to hold or spoil. But this is pro boxing where aggression and forcing the fight should be major factors . And didn't you have to really beat the champion to take his title ? Not just jab and grab

No, you don't, that's bullshit, people trot this line out again and again, as if you should have to do something extra to take the belt from the champ. There's a scoring system, you box to the rules, you win enough rounds, you win, you take the belt home.

If that produces results people don't like, that's a shame, but Ward is fighting to the code of the sport he competes in, it's not some sort of moral battleground.
This..... of course. :TU:
Vincent stevenson
Super Middleweight
Posts: 154
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 11:15

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by Vincent stevenson »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
Vincent stevenson wrote:Ward is a product of the worst scoring system in amateur boxing history where 3 of the 5 judges had to press within a second of each other to register a point . It produced dreadful top level amateur boxing that was more akin to sword fencing and has subsequently been changed . Ward still looks for one shot then tries to hold or spoil. But this is pro boxing where aggression and forcing the fight should be major factors . And didn't you have to really beat the champion to take his title ? Not just jab and grab
If aggression and forcing the fight were the only major scoring factors, Provodnikov would be a P4P great.
If getting hit squarely in the face with absolutely no defence whatsoever and keep plodding forwards( which is what provodnikov does ) then yes he should be an all time p4p . But that's not what we are talking about here and you are surely not that stupid to think we are . Let's not get silly here
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11181
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by Ezzard »

lillywhite14 wrote:
Ezzard wrote:You and I will watch boxing no matter what. But I don't now anyone under 18 who prefers boxing to UFC. Too many Wards for them to care. Too many Mayweather-Pac Man superfights.
Those of that age I do know who prefer it, box themselves so that kind of influences it I guess!

I'd say from my experience that the casual UFC fan is about as casual a sports fan there is. 'See Conor's post fight interview? Almost as on point as his suit and Bentley pics from the day before...oh and that beard' It's very, shall we say, 'bro'?

Having said that I've started to take more interest. I enjoyed the big card last weekend, well what I see of it. Was entertaining. I like the mix of styles, it's a great idea really. Just lacks substance imo.
The thing is for a sport to thrive it needs those casual fans. I don't watch UFC.

I'm pretty sure Kov landed more punches...but like you say...not that it means much.

I think we're lucky in the UK. Most of our fighters, if not all, look to engage. Ward is more like the Italian national side in the 1970s.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Sergey Kovalev vs Andre Ward

Post by Autobarn »

Kovalev did outland Ward according to Punch stats, for what it's worth.

Oh, agreed with Ezzard about Ward's terrible jab and grab style.

Definitely, there are too many boxers looking to negate rather than produce clean boxing or skilful exchanges.
Post Reply