Page 24 of 26

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:39
by crusader
Bobbyptsd wrote:Well yeah, they sort of are.
Nope

If I clearly deserve to win 5 rounds 10-9 and 1 round 10-8, and you clearly deserve to win 6 rounds 10-9 it's a close fight that hands down should be won by me.

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:39
by lefty
Bobbyptsd wrote:
columbo wrote:Considering Paulie went out of his way to talk to broner after the fight and clear things up. I think Broners comments were pretty vile.
What did he say?
He was just classless as usual. He said im leaving with Paulie's belt and his girl. They looked like they had settled the beef and then Broner starts talking shit again.

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:40
by cbman2
victor-romeo wrote:
cbman2 wrote:Broner saying he wants his fans to pick his next opponent.

Matthysse please
That would be a good fight I would favor Broner, If you want to see Broner hurt you go with Berto at 147..
I think Matthysse would be able to get him out of there, Paulie vs Maidana would be a good one too.

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:40
by victor-romeo
dookus wrote:Broner is an absolute prick and I'll be drinking happy the day his dumb face gets smashed in by a Welterweight with a proper dig. He may have great handspeed power and combinations, but his defence is as leaky as his contraception and his stamina is frankly sub-par for the level he fights at. An SD over a guy Hatton and Khan blew to pieces, well done champ!
Broner is a good fighter who uses his boorish schtick to make money and notoriety, I do think he is carefully matched and can be beaten by many 140-147 pound fighters..

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:40
by Bobbyptsd
crusader wrote:
Bobbyptsd wrote:Well yeah, they sort of are.
Nope

If I clearly deserve to win 5 rounds 10-9 and 1 round 10-8, and you clearly deserve to win 6 rounds 10-9 it's a close fight that hands down should be won by me.
This isn't football.

Is my response to that.

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:41
by The Dawg'
Good one? Your the one who started running your mouth. Everyone has opinions. In boxing you can have a close winner but unanimous decision. But because your hiding in a basement you pop off. Good one..

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:41
by crusader
Bobbyptsd wrote:
crusader wrote:
Bobbyptsd wrote:Well yeah, they sort of are.
Nope

If I clearly deserve to win 5 rounds 10-9 and 1 round 10-8, and you clearly deserve to win 6 rounds 10-9 it's a close fight that hands down should be won by me.
This isn't football.

Is my response to that.
How isn't that a close fight that was won hands down?

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:41
by RadioElRadar
Tbh, I'd favour Alexander pretty heavily over Broner after that.

"Matthysse" immediately came to me when he said he wanted the fans to pick his next opponent lol. Broner v Khan would be a good matchup imo.

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:42
by Bobbyptsd
columbo wrote:
Bobbyptsd wrote:
columbo wrote:Considering Paulie went out of his way to talk to broner after the fight and clear things up. I think Broners comments were pretty vile.
What did he say?
He was just classless as usual. He said im leaving with Paulie's belt and his girl. They looked like they had settled the beef and then Broner starts talking poo again.
That is an awfully dickish thing to say, especially considering Paulie gave him hell, from what I have been reading.

I mean it's dickish either way, but he won a SD, it's not like he knocked him out in 1, he could be a lot more humble.

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:43
by Bobbyptsd
The Dawg' wrote:Good one? Your the one who started running your mouth. Everyone has opinions. In boxing you can have a close winner but unanimous decision. But because your hiding in a basement you pop off. Good one..
You got me again champ.

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:44
by lefty
columbo wrote:
Bobbyptsd wrote:
columbo wrote:Considering Paulie went out of his way to talk to broner after the fight and clear things up. I think Broners comments were pretty vile.
What did he say?
He was just classless as usual. He said im leaving with Paulie's belt and his girl. They looked like they had settled the beef and then Broner starts talking poo again.
That is an awfully dickish thing to say, especially considering Paulie gave him hell, from what I have been reading.

I mean it's dickish either way, but he won a SD, it's not like he knocked him out in 1, he could be a lot more humble.[/quote]

Paulie then called him a bitch again and said dont be bragging about my side piece :lol:

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:44
by The Dawg'
:TU:

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:45
by Rover
RadioElRadar wrote:Tbh, I'd favour Alexander pretty heavily over Broner after that.

"Matthysse" immediately came to me when he said he wanted the fans to pick his next opponent lol. Broner v Khan would be a good matchup imo.
I agree with all that.

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:46
by lefty
I used to think Broner was just putting on an act to sell fights and there is a set routine to what he says like an act. However, he genuinely is a prick i think. With Mayweather you can see glimmers of decency within him ie normally after fights he praises his opponent and doesnt say anything negative.

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:46
by Bobbyptsd
@Crusader

Because that hardly ever happens in boxing, you know that. That's why I mentioned the football thing. I mean, hardly anyone here even agrees on the score, and many disagree on even the winner.

If you saw it as a definite, let's say 115-113 fight that's fine, but I think you'd concede that's one round that if you saw it differently, the whole fight just changed. Two rounds, and it's literally a different winner.

If the rounds were THAT well defined, sure. But I don't know that I've ever seen that happen, particularly in a close fight.

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:47
by Diamond WEAPON
kayfoo wrote:
cbman2 wrote:Broner saying he wants his fans to pick his next opponent.

Matthysse please
He'll avoid Matthysse like the plague.
Anyone with any kind of jab and workrate is knocking Broner's head off, Maidana, Matthysse, Soto-Karass, Guerrero...

Cano is a 50-50 fight with Broner

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:47
by DMA1987
Honestly don't think i'd ever pay to see Broner fight. Not even to see him lose. I just genuinely never want to see his sweaty face ever again.

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:48
by lefty
RadioElRadar wrote:Tbh, I'd favour Alexander pretty heavily over Broner after that.

"Matthysse" immediately came to me when he said he wanted the fans to pick his next opponent lol. Broner v Khan would be a good matchup imo.
I think either Khan would smash broner to pieces with his lightening fast combo's and wear him down or Broner would land one of his big pot shots he likes to throw and end the fight.

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:48
by lefty
DMA1987 wrote:Honestly don't think i'd ever pay to see Broner fight. Not even to see him lose. I just genuinely never want to see his sweaty face ever again.
:lol:

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:48
by kayfoo
Diamond WEAPON wrote:
kayfoo wrote:
cbman2 wrote:Broner saying he wants his fans to pick his next opponent.

Matthysse please
He'll avoid Matthysse like the plague.
Anyone with any kind of jab and workrate is knocking Broner's head off, Maidana, Matthysse, Soto-Karass, Guerrero...

Cano is a 50-50 fight with Broner
:TU:

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:50
by lefty
Anyway, night fella's! Im fucked!

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:50
by chucktaylor
That was a top notch boxing match, fair play to Broner, I had him up 116-114, but he is not gaining any fans with really over-the-top trash talk. The right amount of it can be a good thing for publicity, but he may be going to far.

Paulie couldn't quite do enough, but Broner has probably lost some of his luster in the public eye by being taken to the limit when he was a huge favorite. People are gonna ask questions like: If Hatton could manhandle Paulie, why couldn't Broner?

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:50
by Bobbyptsd
columbo wrote:Anyway, night fella's! Im fucked!
Goodnight Lefty.

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:52
by crusader
Bobbyptsd wrote:@Crusader

Because that hardly ever happens in boxing, you know that. That's why I mentioned the football thing. I mean, hardly anyone here even agrees on the score, and many disagree on even the winner.

If you saw it as a definite, let's say 115-113 fight that's fine, but I think you'd concede that's one round that if you saw it differently, the whole fight just changed. Two rounds, and it's literally a different winner.

If the rounds were THAT well defined, sure. But I don't know that I've ever seen that happen, particularly in a close fight.
If it can happen there's no mutual exclusivity.

I can think of several instances in which fighters won close but clear fights, such as Jamie McDonnell-Julio Ceja and Marco Huck-Ola Afolabi I. I also had Nathan Cleverly beating Tony Bellew 115-114 and I would've had it 114-114 if I scored the even round for Bellew, which would've been fair to do. Yet I couldn't find another round to score for Bellew, meaning that even though I had it so close and could see a draw I don't think a win for Bellew would've been fair.

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Posted: 23 Jun 2013, 00:52
by Rover
columbo wrote:Anyway, night fella's! Im fucked!
Night.