Re: Tyson Fury vs. Deontay Wilder III - October 9, 2021
Posted: 09 Sep 2021, 08:10
• Wilder – contractual obligation
You aren't obliged to a contract if you don't sign it.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑09 Sep 2021, 09:20• Wilder – contractual obligation
• Joshua – contractual obligation, since both parties announced back in March that they'd agreed the terms of a two-fight deal
• Whyte – WBC mandatory challenger and probably the third biggest commercial draw in the heavyweight division
• Chisora – Fury has always promised that he’d fight his good friend in the final bout of his career
We can probably work out his name from those figures..Enlightened-One wrote: ↑17 Sep 2021, 11:46 This isn't a maths, but:
546853 = 566616
546853 is completely removed from the forum.
At precisely the same time, 566616 suddenly starts posting to the forum!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
who gives a crap?Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑17 Sep 2021, 12:08We can probably work out his name from those figures..Enlightened-One wrote: ↑17 Sep 2021, 11:46 This isn't a maths, but:
546853 = 566616
546853 is completely removed from the forum.
At precisely the same time, 566616 suddenly starts posting to the forum!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Name begins with J K or L
Who woke you upadislav123 wrote: ↑17 Sep 2021, 16:53who gives a crap?Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑17 Sep 2021, 12:08We can probably work out his name from those figures..Enlightened-One wrote: ↑17 Sep 2021, 11:46 This isn't a maths, but:
546853 = 566616
546853 is completely removed from the forum.
At precisely the same time, 566616 suddenly starts posting to the forum!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Name begins with J K or L
Fury said he would have been sued for $80 million if he dropped the belt and fought Joshua instead. He should have just took the rematch. He could have had a 3rd fight with Wilder done and a fight with Joshua.candyslim wrote: ↑18 Sep 2021, 06:34 Fury can say whatever TF he likes but it wasn't Anthony Joshua who pulled out of their unification. Joshua was visibly furious when the fight fell over and if that wasn't genuine then he's a better actor than he is a boxer.
Maybe Fury had no choice but to pull out, or maybe he could have put Wilder on ice, who knows, but this talk of doubting the fight will happen, "Joshua talks a good fight but is he really a boxing man?" sounds to me he is preparing his escape route.
I'm beginning to think Fury has no more intention of ever stepping in the ring with Joshua than Wilder had. Go back and watch his demeanour change when the unification got cancelled. He looked like a condemned man who just got told his innocence had been proven.
If you and Joshua never meet in the ring it won't be AJ's fault, it'll be yours you slippery bastard.
The way I heard it, US Law (dunno if that means federal or state in which case which state or states?) the arbitration decision would not be permitted to derail the unification due to the sum of money involved in the unification. I don't suppose that it was anticipated that ruling would be anywhere near the magniude of $80m how TF was that figure arrived at, on what planet was Fury v Wilder III ever going to generate that kind of money??? Do we even believe him?566616 wrote: ↑18 Sep 2021, 09:14Fury said he would have been sued for $80 million if he dropped the belt and fought Joshua instead. He should have just took the rematch. He could have had a 3rd fight with Wilder done and a fight with Joshua.candyslim wrote: ↑18 Sep 2021, 06:34 Fury can say whatever TF he likes but it wasn't Anthony Joshua who pulled out of their unification. Joshua was visibly furious when the fight fell over and if that wasn't genuine then he's a better actor than he is a boxer.
Maybe Fury had no choice but to pull out, or maybe he could have put Wilder on ice, who knows, but this talk of doubting the fight will happen, "Joshua talks a good fight but is he really a boxing man?" sounds to me he is preparing his escape route.
I'm beginning to think Fury has no more intention of ever stepping in the ring with Joshua than Wilder had. Go back and watch his demeanour change when the unification got cancelled. He looked like a condemned man who just got told his innocence had been proven.
If you and Joshua never meet in the ring it won't be AJ's fault, it'll be yours you slippery bastard.
It will be interesting how Wilder's body attack will work vs Fury. Smart move I think.
Please. Fury knew all along he had to abide by a rematch clause, or be sued for big bucks if he ducked it. Him negotiating with AJ for a fight in the meantime was stupid.candyslim wrote: ↑18 Sep 2021, 14:58The way I heard it, US Law (dunno if that means federal or state in which case which state or states?) the arbitration decision would not be permitted to derail the unification due to the sum of money involved in the unification. I don't suppose that it was anticipated that ruling would be anywhere near the magniude of $80m how TF was that figure arrived at, on what planet was Fury v Wilder III ever going to generate that kind of money??? Do we even believe him?566616 wrote: ↑18 Sep 2021, 09:14Fury said he would have been sued for $80 million if he dropped the belt and fought Joshua instead. He should have just took the rematch. He could have had a 3rd fight with Wilder done and a fight with Joshua.candyslim wrote: ↑18 Sep 2021, 06:34 Fury can say whatever TF he likes but it wasn't Anthony Joshua who pulled out of their unification. Joshua was visibly furious when the fight fell over and if that wasn't genuine then he's a better actor than he is a boxer.
Maybe Fury had no choice but to pull out, or maybe he could have put Wilder on ice, who knows, but this talk of doubting the fight will happen, "Joshua talks a good fight but is he really a boxing man?" sounds to me he is preparing his escape route.
I'm beginning to think Fury has no more intention of ever stepping in the ring with Joshua than Wilder had. Go back and watch his demeanour change when the unification got cancelled. He looked like a condemned man who just got told his innocence had been proven.
If you and Joshua never meet in the ring it won't be AJ's fault, it'll be yours you slippery bastard.
It will be interesting how Wilder's body attack will work vs Fury. Smart move I think.
People forget that not a peep was heard out of Wilder for at least six months after Fury humiliated him. Yes his team had indicated that he would exercise his option for the third fight immediately after losing but how long was Fury supposed to wait for him?
It was only when Fury said he was giving up waiting on Deontay and would be moving on with his career without him that Wilder suddenly came alive. I have little sympathy for either of them. Wilder has been an obstacle in the way of our seeing competitive heavyweight title fights for seven years now, in fact that is what I'll always remember him for.
As for Fury, I still have the last vestiges of patience and interest in him, but it's running out like dirty bathwater down the plughole and if Tyson Fury assured me that it was going to be 90 degrees in Vegas, I'd make sure to pack an overcoat.
Is Sulaiman not privvy to contracts involving the WBC title? He also gave the go ahead for undisputedBandog wrote: ↑18 Sep 2021, 18:49Please. Fury knew all along he had to abide by a rematch clause, or be sued for big bucks if he ducked it. Him negotiating with AJ for a fight in the meantime was stupid.candyslim wrote: ↑18 Sep 2021, 14:58The way I heard it, US Law (dunno if that means federal or state in which case which state or states?) the arbitration decision would not be permitted to derail the unification due to the sum of money involved in the unification. I don't suppose that it was anticipated that ruling would be anywhere near the magniude of $80m how TF was that figure arrived at, on what planet was Fury v Wilder III ever going to generate that kind of money??? Do we even believe him?566616 wrote: ↑18 Sep 2021, 09:14
Fury said he would have been sued for $80 million if he dropped the belt and fought Joshua instead. He should have just took the rematch. He could have had a 3rd fight with Wilder done and a fight with Joshua.
It will be interesting how Wilder's body attack will work vs Fury. Smart move I think.
People forget that not a peep was heard out of Wilder for at least six months after Fury humiliated him. Yes his team had indicated that he would exercise his option for the third fight immediately after losing but how long was Fury supposed to wait for him?
It was only when Fury said he was giving up waiting on Deontay and would be moving on with his career without him that Wilder suddenly came alive. I have little sympathy for either of them. Wilder has been an obstacle in the way of our seeing competitive heavyweight title fights for seven years now, in fact that is what I'll always remember him for.
As for Fury, I still have the last vestiges of patience and interest in him, but it's running out like dirty bathwater down the plughole and if Tyson Fury assured me that it was going to be 90 degrees in Vegas, I'd make sure to pack an overcoat.
Maybe so but like I said (although I can't attest to the truth of that) US Law would not have allowed the arbitration decision to prevent the unification from going ahead, because it would have caused significant financial hardship to Fury and to Joshua. That doesn't mean Fury would not still have an obligation to fight Wilder after that.Bandog wrote: ↑18 Sep 2021, 18:49Please. Fury knew all along he had to abide by a rematch clause, or be sued for big bucks if he ducked it. Him negotiating with AJ for a fight in the meantime was stupid.candyslim wrote: ↑18 Sep 2021, 14:58The way I heard it, US Law (dunno if that means federal or state in which case which state or states?) the arbitration decision would not be permitted to derail the unification due to the sum of money involved in the unification. I don't suppose that it was anticipated that ruling would be anywhere near the magniude of $80m how TF was that figure arrived at, on what planet was Fury v Wilder III ever going to generate that kind of money??? Do we even believe him?566616 wrote: ↑18 Sep 2021, 09:14
Fury said he would have been sued for $80 million if he dropped the belt and fought Joshua instead. He should have just took the rematch. He could have had a 3rd fight with Wilder done and a fight with Joshua.
It will be interesting how Wilder's body attack will work vs Fury. Smart move I think.
People forget that not a peep was heard out of Wilder for at least six months after Fury humiliated him. Yes his team had indicated that he would exercise his option for the third fight immediately after losing but how long was Fury supposed to wait for him?
It was only when Fury said he was giving up waiting on Deontay and would be moving on with his career without him that Wilder suddenly came alive. I have little sympathy for either of them. Wilder has been an obstacle in the way of our seeing competitive heavyweight title fights for seven years now, in fact that is what I'll always remember him for.
As for Fury, I still have the last vestiges of patience and interest in him, but it's running out like dirty bathwater down the plughole and if Tyson Fury assured me that it was going to be 90 degrees in Vegas, I'd make sure to pack an overcoat.
Plenty of people are probably doubting if Fury actually shows up. If he does, I'll be surprised.stevec@france wrote: ↑22 Sep 2021, 08:03 incredible that there are still plenty tickets for sale only a few weeks until the fight .
Dont you boys believe in your man Wilder !
ya, gonna duck the guy he pounded 60-52 and knocked out.Bandog wrote: ↑22 Sep 2021, 08:47Plenty of people are probably doubting if Fury actually shows up. If he does, I'll be surprised.stevec@france wrote: ↑22 Sep 2021, 08:03 incredible that there are still plenty tickets for sale only a few weeks until the fight .
Dont you boys believe in your man Wilder !