Re: Tyson Fury vs. TBA - September 2023
Posted: 21 Jun 2023, 07:16
AJ dominating another Fury thread.
Dribble seems to be triggered.
Dribble seems to be triggered.
If we are using Suliman as any kind of yardstick we are all in trouble.mickey1975 wrote: ↑21 Jun 2023, 04:17 I don’t think tonyevs, The Gratest and co should listen to the George Groves podcast today. Mauricio Suliman, when asked about the best ever fight for the WBC title had Fury v Wilder 3 on top. He considered Mike Tyson winning the belt and Chavez, etc but couldn’t get away from ‘one of the greatest fights ever seen’. George Foreman said similar recently. That’s legacy.
Obviously, him, Groves and Foreman are now being called Fury nuthuggers…. Obviously, a bloke who calls himself The Gratest will know more than the head of the major sanctioning body.Frostieballs wrote: ↑21 Jun 2023, 08:13If we are using Suliman as any kind of yardstick we are all in trouble.mickey1975 wrote: ↑21 Jun 2023, 04:17 I don’t think tonyevs, The Gratest and co should listen to the George Groves podcast today. Mauricio Suliman, when asked about the best ever fight for the WBC title had Fury v Wilder 3 on top. He considered Mike Tyson winning the belt and Chavez, etc but couldn’t get away from ‘one of the greatest fights ever seen’. George Foreman said similar recently. That’s legacy.
si7dog7 wrote: ↑21 Jun 2023, 13:38![]()
![]()
Jeez Louise!!
Is this thread still going on about…… absolutely nothing?
Where is the massive announcement?
The Heavyweight division is so so bad atm.
It is laughable and I’m not digging any of them out. (Fury, AJ, Usyk, Wilder)
But FFS. Can we just all agree? The fighters and promoters don’t give a monkey’s about the fans (did they ever?). It’s why none of aforementioned get into any All Time Top (well 25 at best) lists. And I think I’m being generous
Legacy? Ffs!!!!
Its a very entertaining fight, but Wilder hasn't really got the chops to be considered anything more than a guy who managed to get and hold onto a belt in a pretty weak era.mickey1975 wrote: ↑21 Jun 2023, 08:52Obviously, him, Groves and Foreman are now being called Fury nuthuggers…. Obviously, a bloke who calls himself The Gratest will know more than the head of the major sanctioning body.Frostieballs wrote: ↑21 Jun 2023, 08:13If we are using Suliman as any kind of yardstick we are all in trouble.mickey1975 wrote: ↑21 Jun 2023, 04:17 I don’t think tonyevs, The Gratest and co should listen to the George Groves podcast today. Mauricio Suliman, when asked about the best ever fight for the WBC title had Fury v Wilder 3 on top. He considered Mike Tyson winning the belt and Chavez, etc but couldn’t get away from ‘one of the greatest fights ever seen’. George Foreman said similar recently. That’s legacy.
This December Saudi thing is starting to look like a carrot on the end of a stick that just keeps getting longer.golden_balls wrote: ↑21 Jun 2023, 16:46 super fight night in Saudi sounding like something from the good ol days of WWF.
not going to happen sadly (hoping it will)
Suleiman is merely selling a WBC asset .. if he had Usyk fronting his belt he'd say Usyk v AJ2 was the best ever .. Suliman is from the same mold as the Fury's for talking sh1t.Frostieballs wrote: ↑21 Jun 2023, 08:13If we are using Suliman as any kind of yardstick we are all in trouble.mickey1975 wrote: ↑21 Jun 2023, 04:17 I don’t think tonyevs, The Gratest and co should listen to the George Groves podcast today. Mauricio Suliman, when asked about the best ever fight for the WBC title had Fury v Wilder 3 on top. He considered Mike Tyson winning the belt and Chavez, etc but couldn’t get away from ‘one of the greatest fights ever seen’. George Foreman said similar recently. That’s legacy.
:TU:HomicideHenry wrote: ↑22 Jun 2023, 04:23 Valuev was never perceived as the top guy though. More like the weakest link in the chain despite the WBA title. The top two was Vitali and Wladimir. In Fury's case he's seen as the top guy, he just doesn't have a great title run.
And Foreman? Why would he say any Usyk-AJ fight was the best ever? Usyk is clearly better than AJ and the fights were poor! Really strange comment as there have been hundreds of WBC championship fights featuring all of the great names and he didn't choose any of thosetonyevs wrote: ↑22 Jun 2023, 02:27Suleiman is merely selling a WBC asset .. if he had Usyk fronting his belt he'd say Usyk v AJ2 was the best ever .. Suliman is from the same mold as the Fury's for talking sh1t.Frostieballs wrote: ↑21 Jun 2023, 08:13If we are using Suliman as any kind of yardstick we are all in trouble.mickey1975 wrote: ↑21 Jun 2023, 04:17 I don’t think tonyevs, The Gratest and co should listen to the George Groves podcast today. Mauricio Suliman, when asked about the best ever fight for the WBC title had Fury v Wilder 3 on top. He considered Mike Tyson winning the belt and Chavez, etc but couldn’t get away from ‘one of the greatest fights ever seen’. George Foreman said similar recently. That’s legacy.
Fury v Wilder 3 was an entertaining edge of seat fight for sure. There were two evenly matched guys just forsaking any limited skills they had to just brawl ... It sure was a classic .. like a pugilistic Decca Heggie v Danny Christie![]()
It was no doubt the icing on the cake of Fury's reign as WBC champion.
He is the UKs Nik Valuev .. big, ugly with a pretty poor reign at top![]()
I do, I think the trilogy with Wilder will go down in history as the best heavyweight one of its era.Twinkle Toes wrote: ↑22 Jun 2023, 05:53 You've got to be all levels of stupid to need Suliman telling you what's legacy - Think for yourself sheep.
Have there been many trilogies in the last 10-15 years? Only other one I can think of is Fury/Chisora.mickey1975 wrote: ↑22 Jun 2023, 06:09I do, I think the trilogy with Wilder will go down in history as the best heavyweight one of its era.Twinkle Toes wrote: ↑22 Jun 2023, 05:53 You've got to be all levels of stupid to need Suliman telling you what's legacy - Think for yourself sheep.
There you go.maverick23 wrote: ↑22 Jun 2023, 06:19Have there been many trilogies in the last 10-15 years? Only other one I can think of is Fury/Chisora.mickey1975 wrote: ↑22 Jun 2023, 06:09I do, I think the trilogy with Wilder will go down in history as the best heavyweight one of its era.Twinkle Toes wrote: ↑22 Jun 2023, 05:53 You've got to be all levels of stupid to need Suliman telling you what's legacy - Think for yourself sheep.
Yes. It’s easily the equal of Ali-Frazier.mickey1975 wrote: ↑22 Jun 2023, 06:09I do, I think the trilogy with Wilder will go down in history as the best heavyweight one of its era.Twinkle Toes wrote: ↑22 Jun 2023, 05:53 You've got to be all levels of stupid to need Suliman telling you what's legacy - Think for yourself sheep.
This era?Frostieballs wrote: ↑22 Jun 2023, 14:28Yes. It’s easily the equal of Ali-Frazier.mickey1975 wrote: ↑22 Jun 2023, 06:09I do, I think the trilogy with Wilder will go down in history as the best heavyweight one of its era.Twinkle Toes wrote: ↑22 Jun 2023, 05:53 You've got to be all levels of stupid to need Suliman telling you what's legacy - Think for yourself sheep.