Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing
Posted: 04 Aug 2008, 22:08


Rick, I always felt that Mike Nixon was the bravest boxer in Southern California.Rick Farris wrote:Bobbin & Weavin wrote:Rick, Frank or anyone else,
There was some mention of middleweight Mike Nixon a ways back in this thread & if I remember correctly one of you knew him fairly well; I had always thought Mike started his career in San Francisco & thought I remembered him from Newman's Gym & I see by looking at his record he had his 1st & 2nd fights in the Bay Area; then the other night going I found a picture of him goofing around for the camera with Emile Griffith at Newman's Gym, so I called my father who reminded me that I lent my sparring gloves to Mike to box with Griffith once. So what's was his story, I know he was a New Yorker but did he get to So Cal through Nor Cal? What's the rest of his story?
Thanks,
Bobbin & Weavin
in Nor Cal
Bobbin . . . I was a stablemate of Nixon's for a couple of years. I've lots ofNixon stories, both in the ring and, more interesting, out of the ring. I knew the family, and his relationship with the Quarry's, etc. Man, I'll share some stories in dur course relating to Mike Nixon, but I haven't time tonight. I last ran into Mike, who had taken residence at the Santa Monica townhouse of the late actor, Chris Penn, in 1992.
Looking forward to discussing Mike Nixon here. Another piece of work.
-Rick
I spoke with Jackie a couple of years ago. He and his wife live in Huntington Beach.kikibalt wrote:
Jackie Hayden
Was timekeeper at the Olympic and Hollywood
Exciting, controversial scrap. Tony just got fed up with low blows, elbows and headwork from Vargas. He bullied the bully. I like the way Frankie calmly consoles Vargas immediately after the stoppage, as if nothing had happened.kikibalt wrote:Tony Baltazar vs Danny Vargas
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84FcAvm--oU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0sOq-aTptQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNxCBvUQHvg
Bennie; just playing nice.....bennie wrote:Exciting, controversial scrap. Tony just got fed up with low blows, elbows and headwork from Vargas. He bullied the bully. I like the way Frankie calmly consoles Vargas immediately after the stoppage, as if nothing had happened.kikibalt wrote:Tony Baltazar vs Danny Vargas
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84FcAvm--oU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0sOq-aTptQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNxCBvUQHvg
Good cornerwork.
Frankie, I recognised Jimmy Montoya in there with you. Who was the other guy? Cheatham?kikibalt wrote:Bennie; just playing nice.....bennie wrote:Exciting, controversial scrap. Tony just got fed up with low blows, elbows and headwork from Vargas. He bullied the bully. I like the way Frankie calmly consoles Vargas immediately after the stoppage, as if nothing had happened.kikibalt wrote:Tony Baltazar vs Danny Vargas
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84FcAvm--oU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0sOq-aTptQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNxCBvUQHvg
Good cornerwork.
Rick,Rick Farris wrote:I spoke with Jackie a couple of years ago. He and his wife live in Huntington Beach.kikibalt wrote:
Jackie Hayden
Was timekeeper at the Olympic and Hollywood
-Rick

yeah Bennie, its Jerry Cheatham alright! the guy playing tiger is a friend of Tony, Greg, the guy is a cop...bennie wrote:Frankie, I recognised Jimmy Montoya in there with you. Who was the other guy? Cheatham?

kikibalt wrote:Frank, I put Tony's fight with Vargas on my website. I created a playlist so all three videos automatically play. This is the url for the page, http://boxing-ring.blogspot.com/2008/08 ... argas.html
It's easier than playing all three one after the other. Use this when giving someone a link.
Randy
You guys are 110% spot on about amateur boxing. It's all CRAP!!!!!! For one thing, people talk about the politics and prejudice involved in pro boxing, and the devils that run it, such as Don King, etc. Well, the truth is amateur boxing (amateur sports, that is) is the most politically corrupt, senseless reality on the face of the earth. The "white uniformed" USA boxing officcials are "tipped off" prior to a match to always favor the kid on the USA Team, as opposed to the young American who is not "on the team". The scoring and rules are offensive and unrealistic. Computors??? What the Hell does a computor know or understand about a hurt boxer, or what punch would have changed the course of a bout. Pain and injury do not always decide who wins a real fight, there are more imoortant factors, such as spiriti, instinct, courage, loyalty and just plain charactor. Show me a computor that understands hunger in the individual, desire. It's all CRAP!!!!! And I would not ruin a real fighter by subjecting him to the BS he'll encounter in today's amateur boxing. At most, I'd take a kid and turn him lose, explaining that what we were learning in the gym is not accepted by the officials, and that if he didnt take his opponent out quick, he was likely to be disqualified. In that case I'd warn him, "don't take your disqualification tomean anything. The idea is justg to get a little ring experience before an audience. Don't plan on winning, if we do, consider it a bonus. The rules are stacked against boxers who can "fight".kikibalt wrote:I'm with you guys also, I don't watch amateur boxing myself.Expug wrote:Im with ya Bennie.
The amateur scene doesnt really interest me anymore either.
I havent followed it in awhile.
Bobbin & Weavin wrote:Rick, Frank or anyone else,
There was some mention of middleweight Mike Nixon a ways back in this thread & if I remember correctly one of you knew him fairly well; I had always thought Mike started his career in San Francisco & thought I remembered him from Newman's Gym & I see by looking at his record he had his 1st & 2nd fights in the Bay Area; then the other night going I found a picture of him goofing around for the camera with Emile Griffith at Newman's Gym, so I called my father who reminded me that I lent my sparring gloves to Mike to box with Griffith once. So what's was his story, I know he was a New Yorker but did he get to So Cal through Nor Cal? What's the rest of his story?
Thanks,
Bobbin & Weavin
in Nor Cal
Expug wrote:Great post as usual Rick.
My impression of the amateurs these days is I dont know what the future holds.
The last few years here in the Chicago Golden Gloves, there has been a huge dropoff in the amount of fighters entering the tournament.
There are hardly any fighters in the 126 and below divisions.
Back in the seventies when I fought in this tourny, these divisions as well as all the others were stacked.
The other thing is , I dont know who is fighting who, but Ive always been VERY skeptical of am. fighters claiming these 700 - 0 records.
You know as well as I do that in the ams, if you fight often, your gonna drop some.
Ive been involved with amateur Judo for some years now and we face many of the same political headaches.
Ive fought alot of tournaments in that sport, but I lost track of my won - loss record a long time ago.
Ive won alot but lost plenty also.
Not as much emphasis on keeping track.
More emphasis on the placement in a particular tournament.
Yes, Rick, a great point!! Which I why I can't understand folks who trivialize Rocky Marciano's 49-0 record. Granted, early in his career, the opponents weren't all world-beaters. But even so, it is hard to imagine the focus and dedication it must have taken to go 49-0. He always figured out a way to win. He was always at his best. What a fighter!Rick Farris wrote:Expug wrote:Great post as usual Rick.
My impression of the amateurs these days is I dont know what the future holds.
The last few years here in the Chicago Golden Gloves, there has been a huge dropoff in the amount of fighters entering the tournament.
There are hardly any fighters in the 126 and below divisions.
Back in the seventies when I fought in this tourny, these divisions as well as all the others were stacked.
The other thing is , I dont know who is fighting who, but Ive always been VERY skeptical of am. fighters claiming these 700 - 0 records.
You know as well as I do that in the ams, if you fight often, your gonna drop some.
Ive been involved with amateur Judo for some years now and we face many of the same political headaches.
Ive fought alot of tournaments in that sport, but I lost track of my won - loss record a long time ago.
Ive won alot but lost plenty also.
Not as much emphasis on keeping track.
More emphasis on the placement in a particular tournament.
Good post, Pug. I found the same politics during my experience with martial arts, etc. However, I somehow believed that boxing was different. Not so, in fact, it's probably worse. You make such a great point about these unbeaten "super records". When I see ANY fighter with an unbeaten record, I always ask myself, "just who have they fought?" You know, for example, we had certain kids in our Jr. GG's programs (when I was fighting in them during the mid-60's) that rarely lost becasue they were just so damn good, like the Balatzar boys, Davila, Duarte, etc. however, they ALL lost on occasion. If they were the best they won, but human nature and reality prevents human beings from always being at their best. You may be sick, have something on your mind, or just get up on the wrong side of the bed. Maybe one's opponent has all the stars lined up in his favor, who knows? If you fight all the time, you will not ALWAYS be at your best. Look at "Ike Williams record. Yes, he had over 100 wins, but also 20 losses. I've never seen better than Williams, only Duran I consider as good.
-Rick



Lurking in the undergrowth, Frankie.kikibalt wrote:Where is Bennie?