Re: Betting thread
Posted: 21 Apr 2017, 17:45
Added on this bout in Germany Saturday afternoon:
Arthur Abraham (-230) vs Robin Krasniqi $230.00 for $100.00
Arthur Abraham (-230) vs Robin Krasniqi $230.00 for $100.00
On the subject of weight, Japanese sources have reported Tapales is seriously struggling to make 118..crusader wrote:I thought Khurt looked fine too, although failing to make weight usually isn't a good sign.
edit: he actually did make weight, just needed another attempt?
Where not talking about a prime AA is the problem. The questions is has AA dropped down to Krasiqui level. Not the other way around.crusader wrote:Surprised at how close those odds are! Where did you get that?
Krasniqi has never shown that he can win at AA's level, and it's definitely a good time to bet on the favourite.
Big line movement on that bout. It opened at -335, I bet at 5Dimes at -230 earlier today and it's all the way down to-185 now. I'm watching Bellator MMA, so I haven't checked yet if there was any missed weight or injury report to cause that extreme movement. I'm tempted to bet more.crusader wrote:Surprised at how close those odds are! Where did you get that?
Krasniqi has never shown that he can win at AA's level, and it's definitely a good time to bet on the favourite.
About timeBennyblanco wrote:Had Fielding by points
Murray by points
Khurtsidze by KO
10/1 on PP
Well played pal.Bennyblanco wrote:About timeBennyblanco wrote:Had Fielding by points
Murray by points
Khurtsidze by KO
10/1 on PP
GlobalBox wrote:11/10 Khurtsidze against Langford, with Paddy Power, I'm on but not sure how long it will be there
GlobalBox wrote:13/8 Khurtsidze ko/tko at Bet365
The Insider wrote:Well played pal.Bennyblanco wrote:About timeBennyblanco wrote:Had Fielding by points
Murray by points
Khurtsidze by KO
10/1 on PP
Share your thoughts nextime thendams wrote:My first post here and I see you guys are doing right history.
It was obvious Charlo kos Hatley. But I didn't see that anyone thought that way
No disrespect - but this is your first post, you are claiming you were sure of a result 'after' the result has come in.... a big underdog, but some saw value. Why would you even bother posting that as a first post? Are you a shill that works for a bookmaker? I'll be keeping an eye on youdams wrote:My first post here and I see you guys are doing right history.
It was obvious Charlo kos Hatley. But I didn't see that anyone thought that way
Ok I got it. We are looking here only in the future, not in the past.boxingknockout wrote:No disrespect - but this is your first post, you are claiming you were sure of a result 'after' the result has come in.... a big underdog, but some saw value. Why would you even bother posting that as a first post? Are you a shill that works for a bookmaker? I'll be keeping an eye on youdams wrote:My first post here and I see you guys are doing right history.
It was obvious Charlo kos Hatley. But I didn't see that anyone thought that way![]()
![]()
![]()
Joshua points? Brave one that.Bennyblanco wrote:My first one for next week
Pulev KO
Joshua points
Quigg points
19/1 on PP
The way ive convinced myself that is that these big events are the majority of the time an anti climax (see fury v wlad for example), and IF it goes all the way and is close i think he'll get the nod.Finn wrote:Joshua points? Brave one that.Bennyblanco wrote:My first one for next week
Pulev KO
Joshua points
Quigg points
19/1 on PP
boxingknockout wrote:No disrespect - but this is your first post, you are claiming you were sure of a result 'after' the result has come in.... a big underdog, but some saw value. Why would you even bother posting that as a first post? Are you a shill that works for a bookmaker? I'll be keeping an eye on youdams wrote:My first post here and I see you guys are doing right history.
It was obvious Charlo kos Hatley. But I didn't see that anyone thought that way![]()
![]()
![]()