Page 4 of 4
Re: The Top 20 All Time Heavyweights
Posted: 17 Dec 2009, 21:26
by Grimm
raylawpc wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Umm, I was joking too.Like I said you are way too uptight about this.
You read too much into my posts. I could give a sh*t about this. It's boxing - a mere pastime. Back in the day it was important because I derived revenue from it. But today, in the total scheme of things its only an amusement.
How 'bout dem Yankees?
Re: The Top 20 All Time Heavyweights
Posted: 16 May 2011, 11:19
by Crease
Buimp.
For the attention of Mr. Kilsby.
Once again Walcott was mentioned, don't you realise that everyone recognises Walcott as a ATG apart from you.

Re: The Top 20 All Time Heavyweights
Posted: 29 May 2011, 10:46
by Dave81
Zelley wrote:MARCIANO was undefeated, so what did all those rated above Marciano in the poll
have that would be any different?
As he was never defeated, any selection to pick others over Marciano is pure speculation
based on weight and height. Skill, power and heart don't appear to count in some
of the "Modern day thinkers". The question is not if the others could stop Marciano, but how many could last if a Marciano right fist was bounced off their chin or neck. :idea:
Or a Marciano elbow for that matter!

Re: The Top 20 All Time Heavyweights
Posted: 30 May 2011, 09:47
by BrocktonBlockbuster49
bum