Fury V McD round by round ?
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
Exittored,
And where exactly are you sat ?
And where exactly are you sat ?
Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
Tyson coming across a compleate **** imo
Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
Ouch! Sounds nasty. How did SKY score it? Looks like Fury has a second life on ITV after all.
-
stevieb_8006
- Heavyweight

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
so you could make a case for tyson or not? Is this post close fight over reaction. I know Boxrec fans r knowledgable but "robbery" is the most over used phrase in boxing nowadays.stujones wrote:The fight was close - which makes the 98-92 score card hard. McDermmott won rounds big, all of Tyson's rounds (on my card) were close.stevieb_8006 wrote:didnt see the fight. was it close at all? U lot make it sound liker it was all 1 way traffic? Did tyson take any flush and do u think the fight will stand him in good stead?
Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
He's a troll, under his bridge.twenty six wrote:Exittored,
And where exactly are you sat ?
Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
Mcdermott sounds like he might pack it in, sounds very jaded.
Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
Do you mean Fury and Henessy, or McDermott and Malone?Coco wrote:Mcdermott will only be a decent gatekeeper domesticly, however you scored it(John had it for me), he has been genuinely exposed tonight, and clearly isn't good enough to get past domestic level.
Hennessy will take him back down a level for a while now.
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
Quite so (you mean Fury has been exposed, right?).Coco wrote:Mcdermott will only be a decent gatekeeper domesticly, however you scored it(John had it for me), he has been genuinely exposed tonight, and clearly isn't good enough to get past domestic level.
Hennessy will take him back down a level for a while now.
Fury -- like so many vast dreadnought heavies -- can't punch his weight. If you're reasonably determined & make him work for three hard rounds, you've got him. He'll never get past Euro level (& that's at the outside, if they can match him soft enough; his size will beat lesser fighters but mighty fistic titans like John McDermott will always feck him).
Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
Lack of calories. Shame, the big fella just doesn't get any close ones.
Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
I thought Tyson came across ok in the interview. He said he worked harder (which is probably true) so deserved to win (not true). It wouldn't be smart to say he believed he lost immediately after the fight.
He repeatedly said he would come back to Brentwood for a rematch so i think reading between the lines he knows what's what and wants to do it again and get a deserved victory.
He repeatedly said he would come back to Brentwood for a rematch so i think reading between the lines he knows what's what and wants to do it again and get a deserved victory.
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
The next white hope,made me eat my words...wot a pile of shite........sorry
Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
I had it 5-5 in rds
O'Connor was way out for me
A REMATCH is called for!
O'Connor was way out for me
A REMATCH is called for!
Last edited by exittored on 11 Sep 2009, 21:27, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
Patially agree. He is just a baby, he will learn from this. He did show some good things, his man strength is about 3 years away. Thats going to help him also.Coco wrote:Mcdermott will only be a decent gatekeeper domesticly, however you scored it(John had it for me), he has been genuinely exposed tonight, and clearly isn't good enough to get past domestic level.
Hennessy will take him back down a level for a while now.
Needs to nuckle down. Had no focus early on.... John forced him to focus... and his stamina was pretty poor - showed an excellent chin.
Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
could of understood where o'connor if he had tyson by a point but 6 points is way way off the mark. Should have a rematch on the froch undercard
Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
Pryce WILL BEAT HIM... and British boxings is getting more & more 'protected, guarded and corrupt here as we go along, and the irony is the ones they are protecting ARE NOT THE BEST CHOICE FOR WORLD HONOURS.
just give us the best in the land fighting each other and the TRUE winners going on to represent.
How hard can it be???
just give us the best in the land fighting each other and the TRUE winners going on to represent.
How hard can it be???
Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
Yeah of course Fury has been exposed and will be very lucky to win a Brit title, Hennessy will take Fury down a level now. McDermott ain't great, isn't a puncher and didn't do anything special tonight, but still proved too much for Fury.whicker wrote:Do you mean Fury and Henessy, or McDermott and Malone?Coco wrote:Mcdermott will only be a decent gatekeeper domesticly, however you scored it(John had it for me), he has been genuinely exposed tonight, and clearly isn't good enough to get past domestic level.
Hennessy will take him back down a level for a while now.
-
stevieb_8006
- Heavyweight

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
diggler wrote:could of understood where o'connor if he had tyson by a point but 6 points is way way off the mark. Should have a rematch on the froch undercard
so its not quite the "lewis v holyfield" robbery its being painted as? Could u make a case for fury?
Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
exittored wrote:I had it 6-4 rds to TYSON based on workrate and cleaner scoring punches
O'Connor was way out for me but he made the right call in who won
A REMATCH is called for!
Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
Fury saying he won and would knock McDermott out next time, the only thing he knocks out are punchbags.
He's going no where domestically, let alone world class.
He's going no where domestically, let alone world class.
Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
Fury has only had 8 fights, should he really be written off for struggling against a decent, experienced fighter like McDermott?
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
It is that bad as it happens. Fury only won 2 rounds on my card. If anyone had that fight close then you have no idea how to score a fight.stevieb_8006 wrote:diggler wrote:could of understood where o'connor if he had tyson by a point but 6 points is way way off the mark. Should have a rematch on the froch undercard
so its not quite the "lewis v holyfield" robbery its being painted as? Could u make a case for fury?
-
stevieb_8006
- Heavyweight

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
boxrec wrote:Its the biggest robbery i have seen so far in boxing.stevieb_8006 wrote:diggler wrote:could of understood where o'connor if he had tyson by a point but 6 points is way way off the mark. Should have a rematch on the froch undercard
so its not quite the "lewis v holyfield" robbery its being painted as? Could u make a case for fury?
And i'm a danny williams fan, i thought williams won the 2nd fight, and drew the 1st.
Mcdermott deserves his dues.
with total respect, quite a few people r saying they could accept a draw, cant be THAT much of a robbery surely?
Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
It will be interesting if this reality check will persuade Hennessey to find Fury a more established trainer. He's still got potential but he'll need to be brought along very slowly. English/British/Commonwealth challenges could take a few years and give him time before he tries to move up to Euro class
Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
On that performance the George Foreman of today would beat Fury. I hope this stops some of the silly hype, and get Fury to knuckle down, and do his apprentiship properly. He is only young and shouldn't come back up to this level for at least another year.
Re: Fury V McD round by round ?
You didn't watch it, so why are you trying to have a say on whether it was a robbery or not?stevieb_8006 wrote:with total respect, quite a few people r saying they could accept a draw, cant be THAT much of a robbery surely?