Page 4 of 5
Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 25 Sep 2009, 11:52
by WayoftheCass
DG. wrote:man grenade wrote:'they never put him in with slick black boxers'

what an idiot KNOW YOURSELF RRRREEEEEEEEEEWWWWWWWWEEEEEEEED BOOOOOOOOAAAAAYYY BOOYAKASHA!!!
You dumb git, someone else made that comment - but they messed up the quote function.

I love the way when someone says 'idiot' you automatically assume it's you they are referring to DG. Bless!
:P
Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 25 Sep 2009, 12:05
by WayoftheCass
Happy Slapper wrote:chesh wrote:Floyd has not regained his P4P no. 1 spot by bullying a SMALLER fighter in a boring performance - which is what he did the other night. Pac has earned the top spot by bulling BIGGER fighters in sensational performances.
Pac is faster than Floyd, hits harder and throws bombs from crazy angles which would seriously test even Floyd's defensive skills. P4P Pac is better, but as Floyd seems to have bulked up during his "retirement" his probable in-ring weight advantage of about 10 pounds might even things out in an actual fight. This thread is about P4P, however, and whichever way you look at it, Pac is ahead. More titles in more weight classes, more future Hall of Famers fought and defeated. And, last but not least, Pac ducks no-one.
I'm not sure he's faster than Floyd. Maybe foot speed, but I don't think he has quicker hand speed than Floyd. I actually agree with DG (twice in a week), I think he is overrated. The wins over Hatton and De La Hoya flattered him against two fighters who were shot and weight drained. Floyd would take him to school and stop him around the midway mark, and Sugar Shane would blast him out in about 3 rounds. I think he beats Cotto though... never rated rated Cotto.
I know that styles make fights but if Manny can overcome Cotto then I think that’s a bigger scalp than the ageing Mosley. 'Sugar' Shane is a dangerous man but there is nothing to suggest that Manny is chinny and outside of the Margarito fight , which still went 9, it's been the best part of a decade since Shane ended a fight before the 6th.
As for PBF beating Manny in 6 that would indicate that either A) Floyd is prepared to take risks against Manny, who hits like a truck, that he wasn't against the much older and bloated JMM which I find unlikely or that B) Manny and team Roach produce a game plan and performance on a par to Arturo Gatti's display and no offence to Arturo (God rest his soul) but Manny is in a different league to him.
I have no doubt that PBF could very well box Manny's ears off but that's more down to Floyd being an outstanding talent than Manny being poor. Certain people, you know who you are he who shall not be named
![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
, are trying to combine the two and that is both illogical and well...stupid. You see that a lot on forums. One fighter produces a great display which makes a completely unrelated fighter $hit somehow. People says ODLH and Hatton were weight drained yet don't acknowledge JMM looking $hit physically and relatively diminutive compared to Floyd. The door swings both ways.

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 25 Sep 2009, 13:03
by DG.
WayoftheCass wrote:DG. wrote:man grenade wrote:'they never put him in with slick black boxers'

what an idiot KNOW YOURSELF RRRREEEEEEEEEEWWWWWWWWEEEEEEEED BOOOOOOOOAAAAAYYY BOOYAKASHA!!!
You dumb git, someone else made that comment - but they messed up the quote function.

I love the way when someone says 'idiot' you automatically assume it's you they are referring to DG. Bless!
:P
Dumb bastard!
You were making reference to the 'slick fighter' comment and you thought it was me who said it -you knob.
Wayofass!

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 25 Sep 2009, 13:12
by DG.
WayoftheCass wrote:Happy Slapper wrote:chesh wrote:Floyd has not regained his P4P no. 1 spot by bullying a SMALLER fighter in a boring performance - which is what he did the other night. Pac has earned the top spot by bulling BIGGER fighters in sensational performances.
Pac is faster than Floyd, hits harder and throws bombs from crazy angles which would seriously test even Floyd's defensive skills. P4P Pac is better, but as Floyd seems to have bulked up during his "retirement" his probable in-ring weight advantage of about 10 pounds might even things out in an actual fight. This thread is about P4P, however, and whichever way you look at it, Pac is ahead. More titles in more weight classes, more future Hall of Famers fought and defeated. And, last but not least, Pac ducks no-one.
I'm not sure he's faster than Floyd. Maybe foot speed, but I don't think he has quicker hand speed than Floyd. I actually agree with DG (twice in a week), I think he is overrated. The wins over Hatton and De La Hoya flattered him against two fighters who were shot and weight drained. Floyd would take him to school and stop him around the midway mark, and Sugar Shane would blast him out in about 3 rounds. I think he beats Cotto though... never rated rated Cotto.
I know that styles make fights but if Manny can overcome Cotto then I think that’s a bigger scalp than the ageing Mosley. 'Sugar' Shane is a dangerous man but there is nothing to suggest that Manny is chinny and outside of the Margarito fight , which still went 9, it's been the best part of a decade since Shane ended a fight before the 6th.
As for PBF beating Manny in 6 that would indicate that either A) Floyd is prepared to take risks against Manny, who hits like a truck, that he wasn't against the much older and bloated JMM which I find unlikely or that B) Manny and team Roach produce a game plan and performance on a par to Arturo Gatti's display and no offence to Arturo (God rest his soul) but Manny is in a different league to him.
I have no doubt that PBF could very well box Manny's ears off but that's more down to Floyd being an outstanding talent than Manny being poor. Certain people, you know who you are he who shall not be named
![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
, are trying to combine the two and that is both illogical and well...stupid. You see that a lot on forums. One fighter produces a great display which makes a completely unrelated fighter $hit somehow. People says ODLH and Hatton were weight drained yet don't acknowledge JMM looking $hit physically and relatively diminutive compared to Floyd. The door swings both ways.

For the rantings of an idiot - see above!
Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 25 Sep 2009, 13:40
by hitman_hatton1
jesus christ Dennis.
one of the best fighters of all time and he still don't rate him.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 25 Sep 2009, 14:43
by banjo
hitman_hatton1 wrote:jesus christ Dennis.
one of the best fighters of all time and he still don't rate him.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Best fighters of all time? He'd probably have died against Chavez or Duran

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 25 Sep 2009, 14:54
by Horse
banjo wrote:Best fighters of all time? He'd probably have died against Chavez or Duran

Pacquaio would have died against Chavez or Duran? Or are you talking about someone else dying?
Either way I don't think it is a funny thought.
Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 25 Sep 2009, 14:58
by banjo
Horse wrote:banjo wrote:Best fighters of all time? He'd probably have died against Chavez or Duran

Pacquaio would have died against Chavez or Duran? Or are you talking about someone else dying?
Either way I don't think it is a funny thought.

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 25 Sep 2009, 18:35
by Horse
banjo wrote:Horse wrote:Pacquaio would have died against Chavez or Duran? Or are you talking about someone else dying?
Either way I don't think it is a funny thought.

What is so funny?
Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 25 Sep 2009, 19:16
by nuclearfist78
UNTIL HE FACE FLOYD, IT'S A GREAT BATTLE TO WATCH FOR ;) SPEED VERSUS SPEED AND POWER VERSUS POWER! USA VERSUS PHILIPPINES!
Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 25 Sep 2009, 20:54
by jamesmcdonnell
Pacman and floyd are both great fighters, simple as. Whatever the criticisms, they are both amazing talents. Let's see them fight.
Floyd will win hands down I think, but i still want to see it.
Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 25 Sep 2009, 20:56
by jamesmcdonnell
Horse wrote:banjo wrote:Best fighters of all time? He'd probably have died against Chavez or Duran

Pacquaio would have died against Chavez or Duran? Or are you talking about someone else dying?
Either way I don't think it is a funny thought.
Pacman would have been competitive against Chavez or Duran, especially Chavez who wasn't the quickest. Duran I think had too many wrinkles, but I don't think he would have taken Pacman apart.
Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 25 Sep 2009, 22:56
by Gray-Fox
anyone who thinks MP can beat Floyd is an idiot.
Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 25 Sep 2009, 23:09
by Horse
Gray-Fox wrote:anyone who thinks MP can beat Floyd is an idiot.
I disagree.
Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 26 Sep 2009, 12:46
by WayoftheCass
DG. wrote:
Dumb bastard!
You were making reference to the 'slick fighter' comment and you thought it was me who said it -you knob.
Wayofass!

Awww did my big words and informed opinion upset the Dick Gobbler???????
Dry your eyes matey. It will only get worse.
![[icon_twisted.gif] :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 26 Sep 2009, 12:49
by WayoftheCass
DG. wrote:
I know that styles make fights but if Manny can overcome Cotto then I think that’s a bigger scalp than the ageing Mosley. 'Sugar' Shane is a dangerous man but there is nothing to suggest that Manny is chinny and outside of the Margarito fight , which still went 9, it's been the best part of a decade since Shane ended a fight before the 6th.
As for PBF beating Manny in 6 that would indicate that either A) Floyd is prepared to take risks against Manny, who hits like a truck, that he wasn't against the much older and bloated JMM which I find unlikely or that B) Manny and team Roach produce a game plan and performance on a par to Arturo Gatti's display and no offence to Arturo (God rest his soul) but Manny is in a different league to him.
I have no doubt that PBF could very well box Manny's ears off but that's more down to Floyd being an outstanding talent than Manny being poor. Certain people, you know who you are he who shall not be named
![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
, are trying to combine the two and that is both illogical and well...stupid. You see that a lot on forums. One fighter produces a great display which makes a completely unrelated fighter $hit somehow. People says ODLH and Hatton were weight drained yet don't acknowledge JMM looking $hit physically and relatively diminutive compared to Floyd. The door swings both ways.

For the rantings of an idiot - see above!
You forgot to add a smiley. Did your tears break the keyboard? Welcome to the jungle!

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 26 Sep 2009, 14:33
by chesh
Horse wrote:Gray-Fox wrote:anyone who thinks MP can beat Floyd is an idiot.
I disagree.
Me too.
Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 26 Sep 2009, 15:47
by DG.
WayoftheCass wrote:DG. wrote:
I know that styles make fights but if Manny can overcome Cotto then I think that’s a bigger scalp than the ageing Mosley. 'Sugar' Shane is a dangerous man but there is nothing to suggest that Manny is chinny and outside of the Margarito fight , which still went 9, it's been the best part of a decade since Shane ended a fight before the 6th.
As for PBF beating Manny in 6 that would indicate that either A) Floyd is prepared to take risks against Manny, who hits like a truck, that he wasn't against the much older and bloated JMM which I find unlikely or that B) Manny and team Roach produce a game plan and performance on a par to Arturo Gatti's display and no offence to Arturo (God rest his soul) but Manny is in a different league to him.
I have no doubt that PBF could very well box Manny's ears off but that's more down to Floyd being an outstanding talent than Manny being poor. Certain people, you know who you are he who shall not be named
![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
, are trying to combine the two and that is both illogical and well...stupid. You see that a lot on forums. One fighter produces a great display which makes a completely unrelated fighter $hit somehow. People says ODLH and Hatton were weight drained yet don't acknowledge JMM looking $hit physically and relatively diminutive compared to Floyd. The door swings both ways.

For the rantings of an idiot - see above!
You forgot to add a smiley. Did your tears break the keyboard? Welcome to the jungle!

Hello wayofAss Bandit!
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
DD
No 'smileys' when I post from my G2 Touch!
And stop messing up the quotes, ya priick!
Mayweather 120-108 Pacman, but do not rule out a stoppage with body shots!
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
DD
Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 26 Sep 2009, 15:52
by DG.
WayoftheCass wrote:
The door swings both ways. 
And based on ALL your posts, so do you. wayof
ASS!
OWNED!
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
DD
Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 26 Sep 2009, 17:54
by WayoftheCass
DG. wrote:WayoftheCass wrote:
The door swings both ways. 
And based on ALL your posts, so do you. wayof
ASS!
OWNED!
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
DD
Haha. The Dick Gobbler has a G2 touch
![[icon_notworthy.gif] :bow:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
and loves talking about my ass!
Mayweather probably would outpoint PBF! No one ever disagreed with that.
You can only own me if Banjo lets you out. He owned you days ago. True dat!
BANJO'd
![[icon_twisted.gif] :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 26 Sep 2009, 17:56
by Asterix
I see Dennis Gibbs is having a whinge again.
Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 26 Sep 2009, 17:58
by WayoftheCass
Asterix wrote:I see Dennis Gibbs is having a whinge again.
Did you know he has a G2 touch?

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 26 Sep 2009, 18:12
by banjo
Actually I was effing about, I've never met DG in my life.
Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 26 Sep 2009, 18:15
by WayoftheCass
banjo wrote:Actually I was effing about, I've never met DG in my life.
Either have I. Seems like a nice guy though.

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!
Posted: 27 Sep 2009, 07:58
by DG.
I am a great guy! Some say a legend! Wayofassholo thinks pbf beats mayweather? I suppose Floyd did say the only person to beat him would be himself! Lol wayoffass put the pipe down! Read your above post and stopped getting drunk on donkey piss! Lol
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)