Froch vs Dirrell press pictures

tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5843
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: Froch vs Dirrell press pictures

Post by tonyevs »

G0mez wrote:Stylistically, it's been 3 tricky opponents on the spin for Froch.

I think (and so do the people around Froch think), that Dirrell could be the bizz.

I think i'd be more gutted if he turned out to be crap than him actually beating Froch.

He does have very fast, sharp punches. Not sure how concussive they are as his opponents have been stopped on their feet.

He did get floored heavy by a journeyman. The clip THAT I put up on youtube shows a glimpse. But the actual fight, you see Dirrell pretty shook up and he received a standing count in his corner before they let him sit down. The guy WAS a bum and with no skills or power to suggest that "That punch would have put anyone down" etc etc.

Froch does have a few heat seeking missiles that come quicker than his opponent thinks. He paws slowly with the jab at times, but the second and third shots rain in pretty fast and hard. If Dirrell starts backing up the wrong way, Froch will blast him over.

I can see Dirrell starting out with flashy bursts. A mixture of nerves and adrenaline will see him bouncing round a LOT in the first couple of rounds.

But Dirrell fails to work constantly. When he opens up he looks a million dollars, but he does seem to take his foot right off the gas until he can put another flashy burst together.

The thing is, Froch will hopefully weather those bursts and still be there to chase and unload his own bombs as Dirrell tries stay clear and re-energise.

As the fight wears on, Froch will get stronger and stronger. Dirrell's bursts will be sloppier and he will get caught more. He may start clinching, but Froch will throw him off and smell blood. Whether this is the 4th round or the 8th i dont know.

He is young at 25 and the late arrival in the UK has not seemingly had any impact. We know he's trained at altitude which will definitely benefit him.

We know he is hungry and this is his big chance, his opportunity etc etc - but Froch has worked very hard to get into this position and will be far hungrier than Dirrell.

Like every opponent Carl has ever faced, from Dodson to Taylor, Dirrell will have his way with Froch for spells in the beginning as Carl weighs him up and feels what he's got. Then he will then put his foot on the gas and start tearing lumps out of them.

Expect everyone to be shocked at Dirrell soundly outboxing Froch in the opener except for Froch and his corner.

I fully expect this will kick off by the third round and then it will be a war of attrition with Froch the betting favourite to come through anything Dirrell has to seal the deal by knockout.

And I would imagine this scenario is what Froch and his team are praying for - it seems a little wishful thinking though.

Really looking forward to this now. :TU:
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5843
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: Froch vs Dirrell press pictures

Post by tonyevs »

G0mez wrote:
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
JC would have jobbed Carl Froch and stopped him in 9 or less. The JC with brittle hands would have beaten Froch out of sight!! on points.
Each to their own, but i dont think your post is what the majority think.

Joe stopped nobody even close to world level - perhaps the previously beaten likes of Mitchell & Woodhall (whom were in their last ever fight against Joe.)

Hopkins, Jones, Reid, Kessler, Lacy all went 12 with Joe - and Joe was dropped twice and got out of jail with 2 x split decision wins. To suggest he'd whoop Froch or stop him 9 rounds is quite frankly...

The fact is, Calzaghe has lots of skills.. but he has never been a puncher and this 'bad hands' is a load of baloney. The stoppages dried up once he stepped it up, right at the end of his 14 year 'reign'.

The flash knockdown of an old Eubank, on the undercard of an undercard, is perhaps his career highlight for me. The rest of his career has been cleverly timed risks, combined with plenty of duds and mediocre 'former' champions beaten up for chump change at the end of their careers.

His risk fight against Hopkins backfired spectacularly and suddenly 'Pavlik is next' talk dried up very fast. Then he dumped 'the best manager in the world' (Joe's words) who'd got a deal agreed for Calzaghe vs Pavlik with Arum in place.

Then out of the blue, Roy Jones, who had been whoring himself from ringside at Marcus Beyer's comeback fight and elsewhere around the circuit for another payday, suddenly gets this crazy offer from Joe personally, who wants a 'name' to do a 12 round tango to top up his retirement nest egg.

He gives faded Roy an outrageous 50% share of the show, despite Roy never being a huge draw even in his pomp, just to get the deal wrapped up quickly.

Meanwhile Froch gets put as WBC #1 mandatory challenger in the morning and by noon, Calzaghe vacated !

Calzaghe vs Froch would have been the biggest domestic fight since Eubank vs Benn. It would have sold out the millenium easily and British TV would have gone wild to sign it. Unlike Kessler who brought 500 Danes, Froch would have brought 8,000 hardcore fans plus another 10,000+ casual fans from the surrounding East Midlands.

The Jones PPV bombed and not much money came out of it for either man. A Froch fight would have made him a fortune.

You could say "ah couldn't do the weight anymore" which is balls. He was 2lb under for Kessler. And despite vacting the WBC title he still clung onto his WBO for many months as he toyed with fighting on one more time.

Joe was obviously not as confident about his chances as you are mate ! :D

But you fail to mention the disappearance of these awesome boxing skills and the dynamite punch Froch has lost since he moved into world class.

Pascal was said to be chinny by some on here before his fight with Carl. Yet he absorbed everything that night without ever looking likely to taste the canvas.
Against Taylor, Froch was 14 seconds from defeat. And also had the myth about having a concrete chin exploded. Froch`s dynamite punch power wasn’t anywhere to be seen until Taylor had gassed it late on.

Its easy to pick holes in Calzaghe - just like it is Froch. Neither was/is perfect.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5441
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Froch vs Dirrell press pictures

Post by forcefraser »

tonyevs wrote:
G0mez wrote:
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
JC would have jobbed Carl Froch and stopped him in 9 or less. The JC with brittle hands would have beaten Froch out of sight!! on points.
Each to their own, but i dont think your post is what the majority think.

Joe stopped nobody even close to world level - perhaps the previously beaten likes of Mitchell & Woodhall (whom were in their last ever fight against Joe.)

Hopkins, Jones, Reid, Kessler, Lacy all went 12 with Joe - and Joe was dropped twice and got out of jail with 2 x split decision wins. To suggest he'd whoop Froch or stop him 9 rounds is quite frankly...

The fact is, Calzaghe has lots of skills.. but he has never been a puncher and this 'bad hands' is a load of baloney. The stoppages dried up once he stepped it up, right at the end of his 14 year 'reign'.

The flash knockdown of an old Eubank, on the undercard of an undercard, is perhaps his career highlight for me. The rest of his career has been cleverly timed risks, combined with plenty of duds and mediocre 'former' champions beaten up for chump change at the end of their careers.

His risk fight against Hopkins backfired spectacularly and suddenly 'Pavlik is next' talk dried up very fast. Then he dumped 'the best manager in the world' (Joe's words) who'd got a deal agreed for Calzaghe vs Pavlik with Arum in place.

Then out of the blue, Roy Jones, who had been whoring himself from ringside at Marcus Beyer's comeback fight and elsewhere around the circuit for another payday, suddenly gets this crazy offer from Joe personally, who wants a 'name' to do a 12 round tango to top up his retirement nest egg.

He gives faded Roy an outrageous 50% share of the show, despite Roy never being a huge draw even in his pomp, just to get the deal wrapped up quickly.

Meanwhile Froch gets put as WBC #1 mandatory challenger in the morning and by noon, Calzaghe vacated !

Calzaghe vs Froch would have been the biggest domestic fight since Eubank vs Benn. It would have sold out the millenium easily and British TV would have gone wild to sign it. Unlike Kessler who brought 500 Danes, Froch would have brought 8,000 hardcore fans plus another 10,000+ casual fans from the surrounding East Midlands.

The Jones PPV bombed and not much money came out of it for either man. A Froch fight would have made him a fortune.

You could say "ah couldn't do the weight anymore" which is balls. He was 2lb under for Kessler. And despite vacting the WBC title he still clung onto his WBO for many months as he toyed with fighting on one more time.

Joe was obviously not as confident about his chances as you are mate ! :D

But you fail to mention the disappearance of these awesome boxing skills and the dynamite punch Froch has lost since he moved into world class.

Pascal was said to be chinny by some on here before his fight with Carl. Yet he absorbed everything that night without ever looking likely to taste the canvas.
Against Taylor, Froch was 14 seconds from defeat. And also had the myth about having a concrete chin exploded. Froch`s dynamite punch power wasn’t anywhere to be seen until Taylor had gassed it late on.

Its easy to pick holes in Calzaghe - just like it is Froch. Neither was/is perfect.
I don`t hink his chin was exposed. Fair enough he was knocked down, but he was not exactly wobbly when he got up. He took a little composure, took a look at Robbie in the corner, did the eight and got up and knocked him out in the 12th round, what more do you want? :TU:
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5843
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: Froch vs Dirrell press pictures

Post by tonyevs »

forcefraser wrote:

I don`t hink his chin was exposed. Fair enough he was knocked down, but he was not exactly wobbly when he got up. He took a little composure, took a look at Robbie in the corner, did the eight and got up and knocked him out in the 12th round, what more do you want? :TU:
Umm? .. maybe not to have waited a further 8-9rnds later to do the job :roll:
yiddo14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Froch vs Dirrell press pictures

Post by yiddo14 »

Froch actually finished the round stronger than what Taylor did after getting dropped, showing he has good powers of recovery.

He isn't the greatest fighter out there, but I find it hard not to wish him every success.
He has a great attitude.
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5843
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: Froch vs Dirrell press pictures

Post by tonyevs »

yiddo14 wrote:
He isn't the greatest fighter out there, but I find it hard not to wish him every success.
He has a great attitude.

And I agree 100% :TU:
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Froch vs Dirrell press pictures

Post by whiskey »

tonyevs wrote: But you fail to mention the disappearance of these awesome boxing skills and the dynamite punch Froch has lost since he moved into world class.

Pascal was said to be chinny by some on here before his fight with Carl. Yet he absorbed everything that night without ever looking likely to taste the canvas.
Against Taylor, Froch was 14 seconds from defeat. And also had the myth about having a concrete chin exploded. Froch`s dynamite punch power wasn’t anywhere to be seen until Taylor had gassed it late on.

Its easy to pick holes in Calzaghe - just like it is Froch. Neither was/is perfect.
Your right, neither is perfect mate.

But i'm not picking holes in Calzaghe, i'm telling it how it is and simply responding to someone believing he would blast away froch in 9 rounds. At the end of the day we all have our opinions on things and not everyone always agrees which is what makes forums good for debate.

Personally I'm of the opinion that when your going toe to toe in a 'fight of the year' and then you switch to the jab and then run home with the title, that you've done very well. To say "Froch didn't KO pascal" to insinuate he failed is not something i agree with at all. Froch knew he'd wrapped up the title in the latter rounds yet still fought to the very last bell.

Pascal has since moved up to 175lb and captured the WBC title. Something that Peter Manfredo (Joe's 4th from final ever fight) or Evans Ashira haven't gone on to do. Why? because they are poor opposition and are too small for super middleweight let alone Light heavy.

"He was 14 seconds from defeat" - well if Froch decided to sit at home in his comfort zone, fighting undeserving light-middles whom are not even ranked at 168lb, he wouldn't be involved in fierce genuine fights.

The most ridiculous argument I read about Froch is that "he was losing to Taylor" or "Taylor run out of gas".

It's a 12 round fight. Does it never occur to anybody that Taylor was ahead on the cards by so much because he over exerted himself in the beginning?

That's the reason he got blasted in the 12th round by Froch.

If he'd maybe conserved himself more he could have gotten to the scorecards, but it would have been a much closer fight. With many of the difficult to score rounds going to Froch because didn't work as hard.

If he'd have fought Froch with a more conservative plan over the full 12 rounds, instead of going all-out for 7 rounds then coasting he'd maybe be champion right now.

But he didn't. And whilst Froch got put down and outboxed for spells, his plan to stick with it and keep working paid off absolutely perfectly.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5441
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Froch vs Dirrell press pictures

Post by forcefraser »

I am also sick of the argument that Taylor was just 14 seconds away from Victory ergo Froch was lucky to win etc etc

Fact remains that a Championship fight is over 12 rounds and Froch fought for the full 12 rounds and stopped Taylor fair and square. Finishing the fight is a pre-requisite of winning. I don`t believe luck came into it.
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5843
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: Froch vs Dirrell press pictures

Post by tonyevs »

G0mez wrote:[



But he didn't. And whilst Froch got put down and outboxed for spells, his plan to stick with it and keep working paid off absolutely perfectly.
Yes. We all probably have different opinions. And I`m sure there are bones to each side of opinion.
But how differently would we - or the majority of people - be now judging Froch if Taylor had taken a knee when hurt, or spat out his gumshield .. or hugged onto Froch for dear life in the closing last few seconds when he was hurt ... and got the title?

Froch has really grown on me the last year or so. I really hope he does well in this super6.

But unless he shows greater improvement against Kessler, taylor or Abraham. then he will always remind me of a more polished Dennis Andries type fighter.
Last edited by tonyevs on 16 Oct 2009, 08:10, edited 1 time in total.
Eric t
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 308
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 09:52

Re: Froch vs Dirrell press pictures

Post by Eric t »

froch's eyes look like them guys eyes in medievil movies :lol:
Post Reply