Page 4 of 5
Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 07 May 2010, 09:01
by slapbangwhallop
Smigga wrote:slapbangwhallop wrote:He wasn't out in the cold at all, he was injured, maybe you should bare in mind that Magee graciously and voluntarily relinquished his title so that Quigley and Dodson could fight for it - so in essence Smith owes the ownership of his title to Magee!
I owe Magee f*ck all!
The British title is mine, taken from a champion - Which Magee has never done. If you want to get technical then Magee "owes" Carl Froch for vacating after knocking Magee out.
Don't give me that graciously stepped aside bollocks, you know your boxing.... Magee "graciously" SOLD his Lonsdale belt.

Must of touched a nerve there!
Maybe Magee does owe Froch a debt of gratitude, maybe you owe Magee one. My point was made to highlight that Tony's point in the post I was replying to was invalid.
At the end of the day Paul my point is that I dont think you deserve a 50/50 split with Magee if you fight him and you deserve even less if the fight is in Liverpool, if you negoiate more the fair play to you, you got more than you deserve - in my eyes.
I'm not going to fall out with you over it thats just my opinion of the situation. I usually support all the Smith brothers and think ye are good for boxing - I just will be behind Magee on this one!
Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 07 May 2010, 09:03
by Dioufy
Spud,
I feel like hunting you down and causing you severe discomfort. I don't quite know why, but when I see you quoting in almost every sentence, I just want to scream!
Feck knows why!
"Meaty Mick"
![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 07 May 2010, 09:08
by Captain Hook
avidlemon wrote:I just hope any obstacles that are in the way can be overcome, as this could be the biggest and best SMW contest we have seen in britain for a number of years
You mean between two domestic operators, not including Froch and Calzaghe?
Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 07 May 2010, 10:00
by Smigga
slapbangwhallop wrote:Smigga wrote:slapbangwhallop wrote:He wasn't out in the cold at all, he was injured, maybe you should bare in mind that Magee graciously and voluntarily relinquished his title so that Quigley and Dodson could fight for it - so in essence Smith owes the ownership of his title to Magee!
I owe Magee f*ck all!
The British title is mine, taken from a champion - Which Magee has never done. If you want to get technical then Magee "owes" Carl Froch for vacating after knocking Magee out.
Don't give me that graciously stepped aside bollocks, you know your boxing.... Magee "graciously" SOLD his Lonsdale belt.

Must of touched a nerve there!
Maybe Magee does owe Froch a debt of gratitude, maybe you owe Magee one. My point was made to highlight that Tony's point in the post I was replying to was invalid.
At the end of the day Paul my point is that I dont think you deserve a 50/50 split with Magee if you fight him and you deserve even less if the fight is in Liverpool, if you negoiate more the fair play to you, you got more than you deserve - in my eyes.
I'm not going to fall out with you over it thats just my opinion of the situation. I usually support all the Smith brothers and think ye are good for boxing - I just will be behind Magee on this one!
Totally understood mate, no one falling out here

Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 07 May 2010, 10:03
by Smigga
JCB123 wrote:$wifty wrote:There was 2400 people at the Quigley Vs Dodson fight! There was over 6,000 at Smith Vs Quigley. If it was the performance of Quigley V Dodson that attracted so many then why did it again pack out with over 6,00 when Smith fought Dodson....even though everyone says Smith Vs Quigley was a boring fight??? The only common factor in the two packed arena's was Paul Smith. He is a draw in our city weather people like it or not and over 6,000 for a BRITISH title fight is a great turn out. Not taking nothing away from Magee, he is popular in Belfast yes so either way - wherever the fight were to take place then it would be a good turn out, well supported from both sides. The main thing here is IF the fight takes place
C'mon Stephen bending the truth a little there mate, was at all 3 British title fights in the Echo an the most people were at the Dodson v Quigley fight!! ......... Dodson v Smith was empty in comparison, the top balcony was empty and empty seats everywhere!!
Once again you are out the woodwork to post on a thread concerning me. Once again you let your personal 'bitterness' toward me cloud your logic, once again you're wrong.
Check the attendance numbers. Fact is Dodson v Quigley didn't do 3000. It was the least selling show with the MOST publicity thrown at it.
I was at all 3 myself and I know which was attended the least, through facts and figures
Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 07 May 2010, 11:04
by avidlemon
Captain Hook wrote:avidlemon wrote:I just hope any obstacles that are in the way can be overcome, as this could be the biggest and best SMW contest we have seen in britain for a number of years
You mean between two domestic operators, not including Froch and Calzaghe?
for a number of years, maybe barring froch v pascal, and calzaghe v lacy, then yes, i think if it lives up to its potential, that i have made a fair comment.
Smigga, that JCB fella is a pure troll. Does the same stuff on esb.
Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 07 May 2010, 11:54
by mickey1975
avidlemon wrote:Captain Hook wrote:avidlemon wrote:I just hope any obstacles that are in the way can be overcome, as this could be the biggest and best SMW contest we have seen in britain for a number of years
You mean between two domestic operators, not including Froch and Calzaghe?
for a number of years, maybe barring froch v pascal, and calzaghe v lacy, then yes, i think if it lives up to its potential, that i have made a fair comment.
Smigga, that JCB fella is a pure troll. Does the same stuff on esb.
Calzaghe-Kessler was a fairly big one.Unification,50,000 people,both unbeaten....
Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 07 May 2010, 12:11
by slapbangwhallop
Smigga wrote:slapbangwhallop wrote:Smigga wrote:
I owe Magee f*ck all!
The British title is mine, taken from a champion - Which Magee has never done. If you want to get technical then Magee "owes" Carl Froch for vacating after knocking Magee out.
Don't give me that graciously stepped aside bollocks, you know your boxing.... Magee "graciously" SOLD his Lonsdale belt.

Must of touched a nerve there!
Maybe Magee does owe Froch a debt of gratitude, maybe you owe Magee one. My point was made to highlight that Tony's point in the post I was replying to was invalid.
At the end of the day Paul my point is that I dont think you deserve a 50/50 split with Magee if you fight him and you deserve even less if the fight is in Liverpool, if you negoiate more the fair play to you, you got more than you deserve - in my eyes.
I'm not going to fall out with you over it thats just my opinion of the situation. I usually support all the Smith brothers and think ye are good for boxing - I just will be behind Magee on this one!
Totally understood mate, no one falling out here

Good man!
I understand why you are fighting for so much money - its because you got to pay for that new coup! My secretary showed me a picture of it from that pigeon fanciers forum and its some piece - bigger than most houses. ;)
Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 07 May 2010, 12:15
by avidlemon
mickey1975 wrote:avidlemon wrote:Captain Hook wrote:
You mean between two domestic operators, not including Froch and Calzaghe?
for a number of years, maybe barring froch v pascal, and calzaghe v lacy, then yes, i think if it lives up to its potential, that i have made a fair comment.
Smigga, that JCB fella is a pure troll. Does the same stuff on esb.
Calzaghe-Kessler was a fairly big one.Unification,50,000 people,both unbeaten....
Ok, i get it, there may be some ommisions, but my point is it is a big domestic fght. Barring several prominent fights!

Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 07 May 2010, 12:18
by hurlock
magee could potentially get 70-30 elsewhere & still not earn as much as a 50/50 split with smith.
Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 07 May 2010, 12:19
by Terrrrry
Cotto16 wrote:If this fight dosen't come off, hopefully Smith will finally accept George Groves's challage.
George is still begging for a fight with Smith and really does belive he can KO him. Get this fight on......
Groves sounded like he wanted the fight badly after he beat Adamu.
Although Groves vs Degale whets my appetite even more.
Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 07 May 2010, 18:12
by Spud
Jungle drums are beating - news coming soon!!!
Let the hype begin!!
Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 08 May 2010, 04:54
by Ted
Spud wrote:Jungle drums are beating - news coming soon!!!
Let the hype begin!!
When? what? where?
spill the beans mate...........

Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 09 May 2010, 03:30
by avidlemon
Spud wrote:Jungle drums are beating - news coming soon!!!
Let the hype begin!!
Spud,
news?? Don't be a prick tease, just impart your knowledge
Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 10 May 2010, 21:30
by Crease
I'm saying Magee on points.

Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 11 May 2010, 23:31
by hurlock
smith has the better chin.
Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 12 May 2010, 04:05
by slapbangwhallop
hurlock wrote:smith has the better chin.
Magee has nicer eye, and those calves, oooh the definition!
Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 12 May 2010, 04:41
by forcefraser
Spud wrote:Jungle drums are beating - news coming soon!!!
Let the hype begin!!
Inside info? I love it.
Source?
Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 12 May 2010, 12:16
by 15829
been postponed
Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 12 May 2010, 12:24
by Ted
diggler wrote:been postponed
?
Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 12 May 2010, 12:25
by 15829
purse bids
Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 12 May 2010, 12:32
by Bomber 1
diggler wrote:been postponed
Until September sometime....

Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 12 May 2010, 12:48
by gasman
Magee was offered (twice) a crack at Bute's IBF title in Romania in July but turned it down...
Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 12 May 2010, 12:57
by Bomber 1
gasman wrote:Magee was offered (twice) a crack at Bute's IBF title in Romania in July but turned it down...
He'd get eaten alive by Bute.. Bute is extremley dangerous!!!
Im not surprised one bit he turned Bute down..
Re: Magee v Smith
Posted: 12 May 2010, 13:24
by Captain Hook
Was this what Spud's inside knowledge was? He suddenly disappeared when questioned about it - surprise, surprise