Page 4 of 8
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 11:12
by Goodnight, Irene
Writing multi-paragraph replies while you're driving, running your own business with a diploma & having no connection to the miraculous arrival of Boswell Perkins.
Keep searching, Gabs --- there's a credible lie in there somewhere. Could you explain how, "Ureenie" shapes in your mind as witty, while you're at it?
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 11:13
by Raff The Frenchman
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
LOL
sums up pretty well your type of posting...very constructive and mature
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 11:13
by Goodnight, Irene
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:"LOL, I didn't feel like hurting Mugabi's feelings and spending 4 days in a childish internet argument. But Morrison destroying Holmes may be the worst prediction I have ever read."
How prophetic this turned out to be.
How many lives will be lost on our streets while this goes on? No one is safe when the road warrior climbs into his car to tackle Saad. This could wind up like the Holiday Toll.
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 11:14
by Goodnight, Irene
Raff The Frenchman wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
LOL
sums up pretty well your type of posting...very constructive and mature
Apparently, Raff has never written, "LOL." He'd be lucky to spell it, frankly.
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 11:20
by SaadOffTheDeck
Goodnight, Irene wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:"LOL, I didn't feel like hurting Mugabi's feelings and spending 4 days in a childish internet argument. But Morrison destroying Holmes may be the worst prediction I have ever read."
How prophetic this turned out to be.
How many lives will be lost on our streets while this goes on? No one is safe when the road warrior climbs into his car to tackle Saad. This could wind up like the Holiday Toll.
My guess is he has to take to his car because he curses and screams while he types in tiny little fists of rage. That kind of language wouldn't set a good example for his office full of employees.
I must admit, the posting while driving excuse for idiocy is the best one I've heard yet.
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 11:20
by Raff The Frenchman
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Raff The Frenchman wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
LOL
sums up pretty well your type of posting...very constructive and mature
Apparently, Raff has never written, "LOL." He'd be lucky to spell it, frankly.
And THAT also sums up YOUR type of posting...
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 11:22
by SaadOffTheDeck
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Raff The Frenchman wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
LOL
sums up pretty well your type of posting...very constructive and mature
Apparently, Raff has never written, "LOL." He'd be lucky to spell it, frankly.
He is just defending his beau. I wont hold it against him. And it's nice to see him take an interest in something that isn't Klitschko related.
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 11:23
by Goodnight, Irene
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Goodnight, Irene wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:"LOL, I didn't feel like hurting Mugabi's feelings and spending 4 days in a childish internet argument. But Morrison destroying Holmes may be the worst prediction I have ever read."
How prophetic this turned out to be.
How many lives will be lost on our streets while this goes on? No one is safe when the road warrior climbs into his car to tackle Saad. This could wind up like the Holiday Toll.
My guess is he has to take to his car because he curses and screams while he types in tiny little fists of rage. That kind of language wouldn't set a good example for his office full of employees.
I must admit, the posting while driving excuse for idiocy is the best one I've heard yet.
The icing on the cake was when he highlighted it under the paraphrased, "I am smart enough to do two things at once"

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 11:29
by SaadOffTheDeck
Goodnight, Irene wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Goodnight, Irene wrote:
How many lives will be lost on our streets while this goes on? No one is safe when the road warrior climbs into his car to tackle Saad. This could wind up like the Holiday Toll.
My guess is he has to take to his car because he curses and screams while he types in tiny little fists of rage. That kind of language wouldn't set a good example for his office full of employees.
I must admit, the posting while driving excuse for idiocy is the best one I've heard yet.
The icing on the cake was when he highlighted it under the paraphrased, "I am smart enough to do two things at once"

I must admit, I am not capable of driving a vehicle and making a 700 word post at the same time. That explains the lack of paragraph structure. The man is a genius.
Don't gloss over the hilarity of typing on the subway. How could anyone spell properly under those conditions?
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 11:39
by Bricks
LOL 15 or so increasingly insane posts by the trolling twosome since my single last post!
And i see you have made enemies with someone else who disagreed with you! Im still trying to convince myself George Foreman was a terrible infighter and David Haye never avoided anyone in his life! hehehe oh and Goodnight Urineeie could it be you and saad are the same accunt? (Theres another spelling mistake for you to troll over!)
Does seem you two or should i say one are mad enough to argue with yourself judging by your love of trolling!
And dont even try to steal my phrase of the "trolling twosome" to describe you and your husband
There thats one post by me. Lets see you two come back with 15 more posts of trolling hatred which you should know i dont even bother reading! hahah
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 11:44
by Raff The Frenchman
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Goodnight, Irene wrote:Raff The Frenchman wrote:
sums up pretty well your type of posting...very constructive and mature
Apparently, Raff has never written, "LOL." He'd be lucky to spell it, frankly.
He is just defending his beau. I wont hold it against him. And it's nice to see him take an interest in something that isn't Klitschko related.
Wow, you just don't see the irony do you?

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 12:12
by SaadOffTheDeck
mugabi wrote:LOL 15 or so increasingly insane posts by the trolling twosome since my single last post!
And i see you have made enemies with someone else who disagreed with you! Im still trying to convince myself George Foreman was a terrible infighter and David Haye never avoided anyone in his life! hehehe oh and Goodnight Urineeie could it be you and saad are the same accunt? (Theres another spelling mistake for you to troll over!)
Does seem you two or should i say one are mad enough to argue with yourself judging by your love of trolling!
And dont even try to steal my phrase of the "trolling twosome" to describe you and your husband
There thats one post by me. Lets see you two come back with 15 more posts of trolling hatred which you should know i dont even bother reading! hahah
You'll have to forgive the brevity. I'm replying while swimming the English Channel.
Still you fail at ignoring. Is there anything you're competent at?
Wow, if you don't even read my posts this trolling is even worse than I originally thought. You need help.
Edit: In case you're scracthing your head. You'll = You Will
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 12:25
by Bricks
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:mugabi wrote:LOL 15 or so increasingly insane posts by the trolling twosome since my single last post!
And i see you have made enemies with someone else who disagreed with you! Im still trying to convince myself George Foreman was a terrible infighter and David Haye never avoided anyone in his life! hehehe oh and Goodnight Urineeie could it be you and saad are the same accunt? (Theres another spelling mistake for you to troll over!)
Does seem you two or should i say one are mad enough to argue with yourself judging by your love of trolling!
And dont even try to steal my phrase of the "trolling twosome" to describe you and your husband
There thats one post by me. Lets see you two come back with 15 more posts of trolling hatred which you should know i dont even bother reading! hahah
You'll have to forgive the brevity. I'm replying while swimming the English Channel.
Still you fail at ignoring. Is there anything you're competent at?
Wow, if you don't even read my posts this trolling is even worse than I originally thought. You need help.
Edit: In case you're scracthing your head. You'll = You Will
I should have said I have difficulty reading your posts past the first sentence of mentally ill rantings and curses. I switch off at that point!
Im glad your taking some time to wash I just wish your filthy ignorance of boxing would wash away so easily!
You also fail at ignoring but you are a grandmaster at trolling!
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 12:29
by SaadOffTheDeck
mugabi wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:mugabi wrote:LOL 15 or so increasingly insane posts by the trolling twosome since my single last post!
And i see you have made enemies with someone else who disagreed with you! Im still trying to convince myself George Foreman was a terrible infighter and David Haye never avoided anyone in his life! hehehe oh and Goodnight Urineeie could it be you and saad are the same accunt? (Theres another spelling mistake for you to troll over!)
Does seem you two or should i say one are mad enough to argue with yourself judging by your love of trolling!
And dont even try to steal my phrase of the "trolling twosome" to describe you and your husband
There thats one post by me. Lets see you two come back with 15 more posts of trolling hatred which you should know i dont even bother reading! hahah
You'll have to forgive the brevity. I'm replying while swimming the English Channel.
Still you fail at ignoring. Is there anything you're competent at?
Wow, if you don't even read my posts this trolling is even worse than I originally thought. You need help.
Edit: In case you're scracthing your head. You'll = You Will
I should have said I have difficulty reading your posts past the first sentence of mentally ill rantings. I switch off at that point!
Im glad your taking some time to wash I just wish your filthy ignorance would wash so easily!
You also fail at ignoring but you are a grandmaster at trolling!
I'm quite capable at ignoring, your senile ramblings amuse me. Once again you're having difficulty separating your actions from others. You're the one that continues to say you are going to ignore me and you're the one that hangs on to my every word like you do Rafa's balls with your lips.
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 12:34
by Counter-puncher
wow. apparently its true that the internet tends to drag exchanges down to the lowest common denominator.
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 12:37
by Bricks
Saad I do ignore you for a while. I ignored your last 15 rambling posts of paranoid delusions in and only responded with 1 post of my own which sent you into troll mode again
Its not my problem if your retarded brain cant understand I have the right to choose what i ignore and what I dont. You seem to think you can tell others what to think. Thats the whole problem.
FYI I might ignore your next 15 posts of silliness!........than again i might not!!

hahah i can imagine you sitting at your computer , not going to the toilet, not eating , , coiled up like a cobra on the keyboard waiting for me to respond! I imagine youll probably urinate at the computer so afraid are you to lose an argument.
Heres an offer for you pal? stop being such a trolling little nitpicker starting fights with people whose opinions you dont agree with, go away and learn some manners and how to behave like a civilised grown up and I might take pity on you and your trolling husband Urineeeie and agree not to respond to your trolling?
In other words Im giving you a chance to stop ruining this board for those of us who just want to talk boxing.
Put me on your ignore list and ill be more than happy to do the same so that me and the rest of the board dont have to take your insults and ignorance ruining every thread those who have a different opinion to yours post on!
Thats a fair deal isnt it? personally i think you'll carry on trolling you love the purpose in life it gives you!

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 12:43
by SaadOffTheDeck
mugabi wrote:Saad I do ignore you for a while. I ignored your last 15 rambling posts of paranoid delusions and only responded with 1 post which sent you doolally again
Its not my problem if your retarded brain cant understand I have the right to choose what i ignore and what I dont.
I might ignore your next 15 posts of silliness!........than again i might not!!

hahah i can imagine you sitting at your computer coiled up like a cobra waiting for me to respond!
Heres an offer for you pal? stop being such a trolling little nitpicker starting fights with people whose opinions you dont agree with, go away and learn some manners and how to behave like a civilised grown up and I might take pity on you and your trolling husband Urineeeie and agree not to respond to your trolling?
In other words Im giving you a chance to stop ruining this board for those of us who just want to talk boxing.
Put me on your ignore list and ill be more than happy to do the same so that me and the rest of the board dont have to take your insults and ignorance ruining every thread those who have a different opinion to yours post on!
Thats a fair deal isnt it? personally i think you'll carry on trolling you love the purpose in life it gives you!

I'm not ever putting you on ignore, you're way too funny. You're the one that is so upset. If you ever decide to stop trolling me I'd be happy to stop embarrassing you.
You've already ruined this thread, no need to worry about it now. It's simple Mugabi, stop trolling and there wont be any arguments. I could care less if we ever converse again. But if you insist on starting shit in every thread, I'll answer back.
Just like the last time you went nuts when I disagreed with you. it can stop whenever you decide to grow up and STFU.
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 12:48
by Bricks
I think its already well established you are the one who starts fights. Any reasonable person reading this and the other threads like the Czyz one can see that. In fact several have complained about you already but you choose to ignore the truth and defeat that is staring you in the face.
I will make the same offer to you again.
Stop trolling, stop abusing other members,let others have an opinion, put me on ignore, i will do the same and we need never converse again.
The same offer applies to Urineeie.
Put please dont start mimicking my lines, mimicking my advice to you, like you did in your last post, it makes you sound like the retarded little kid you are and its pretty pathetic
dont be like your namesake saddam . accept defeat with dignity. Because any further trolling posts you and your fellow keyboard bully make here will only add to your shameless defeat.
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 12:53
by SaadOffTheDeck
mugabi wrote:I think its already well established you are the one who starts fights. Any reasonable person reading this and the other threads like the Czyz one can see that. In fact several have complained about you already but you choose to ignore the truth and defeat that is staring you in the face.
I will make the same offer to you again.
Stop trolling, stop abusing other members,let others have an opinion, put me on ignore, i will do the same and we need never converse again.
The same offer applies to Urineeie.
Put please dont start mimicking my lines, mimicking my advice to you, like you did in your last post, it makes you sound like the retarded little kid you are and its pretty pathetic
dont be like your namesake saddam . accept defeat with dignity. Because any further trolling posts you and your fellow keyboard bully make here will only add to your shameless defeat.
All I did was laugh at your prediction of Morrison/Holmes. Just like Dempsey did and you took exception to me, just like you always do.
You can continue to repeat the same drivel for another 1,000 pages mugabi. None of it will ever apply. If you really want this to end, stop trolling me. It's as simple as that. I can carry this on every bit as long as you can. You started it, go ahead and end it.
The Czyz thread was another preposterous post from you that nobody agreed with and you got your panties soaked over me. It's probably best if you ignore me, you obviously have no interest in learning anything or carrying on a debate without your inevitable water works and period blood. I'll be laughing at you for as long as you post here.
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 13:12
by boswell perkins
Posted by SaadOffTheDeck:
All I did was laugh at your prediction of Morrison/Holmes. Just like Dempsey did and you took exception to me, just like you always do.
You can continue to repeat the same drivel for another 1,000 pages mugabi. None of it will ever apply. If you really want this to end, stop trolling me. It's as simple as that. I can carry this on every bit as long as you can. You started it, go ahead and end it.
The Czyz thread was another preposterous post from you that nobody agreed with and you got your panties soaked over me. It's probably best if you ignore me, you obviously have no interest in learning anything or carrying on a debate without your inevitable water works and period blood. I'll be laughing at you for as long as you post here.
dude dempsey made fun of mugabi but you didnt see those two arguing like this its pretty clear you only jumped in to troll mugabi from seeing your other posts it seems to be a pattern with you.Go ahead and lash out at me too
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 13:30
by Raff The Frenchman
boswell perkins wrote: Posted by SaadOffTheDeck:
All I did was laugh at your prediction of Morrison/Holmes. Just like Dempsey did and you took exception to me, just like you always do.
You can continue to repeat the same drivel for another 1,000 pages mugabi. None of it will ever apply. If you really want this to end, stop trolling me. It's as simple as that. I can carry this on every bit as long as you can. You started it, go ahead and end it.
The Czyz thread was another preposterous post from you that nobody agreed with and you got your panties soaked over me. It's probably best if you ignore me, you obviously have no interest in learning anything or carrying on a debate without your inevitable water works and period blood. I'll be laughing at you for as long as you post here.
dude dempsey made fun of mugabi but you didnt see those two arguing like this its pretty clear you only jumped in to troll mugabi from seeing your other posts it seems to be a pattern with you.Go ahead and lash out at me too
Don't expect a sensible debate with either Irene or Saad because that wouldn't be trolling and thus they wouldn't enjoy it...
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 13:33
by SaadOffTheDeck
Raff The Frenchman wrote:boswell perkins wrote: Posted by SaadOffTheDeck:
All I did was laugh at your prediction of Morrison/Holmes. Just like Dempsey did and you took exception to me, just like you always do.
You can continue to repeat the same drivel for another 1,000 pages mugabi. None of it will ever apply. If you really want this to end, stop trolling me. It's as simple as that. I can carry this on every bit as long as you can. You started it, go ahead and end it.
The Czyz thread was another preposterous post from you that nobody agreed with and you got your panties soaked over me. It's probably best if you ignore me, you obviously have no interest in learning anything or carrying on a debate without your inevitable water works and period blood. I'll be laughing at you for as long as you post here.
dude dempsey made fun of mugabi but you didnt see those two arguing like this its pretty clear you only jumped in to troll mugabi from seeing your other posts it seems to be a pattern with you.Go ahead and lash out at me too
Don't expect a sensible debate with either Irene or Saad because that wouldn't be trolling and thus they wouldn't enjoy it...
Here is a snesible question. Why in the world would you make a rare trip to this forum to get involved in such a stupid argument? That would define trolling far more than getting caught up in something that started Boxing related.
You don't even pretend to not have an agenda. It's noble coming to Mugabi's rescue. But don't act like you have any involvement in here other than further stirring up the pot.
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 13:33
by Raff The Frenchman
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
Saad & I do have some pretty steep core differences on a few subjects, but I can't say I don't respect his views & the arguments he puts forth. More than can be said for a lot of others, in my view, but, then, that's why I'm the Forum pudendum in the eyes of so many, I suppose

Wow, I'm in a shock, others see you as "the forum pudendum"? man I really wonder why that is.
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 13:34
by Raff The Frenchman
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Raff The Frenchman wrote:boswell perkins wrote:
dude dempsey made fun of mugabi but you didnt see those two arguing like this its pretty clear you only jumped in to troll mugabi from seeing your other posts it seems to be a pattern with you.Go ahead and lash out at me too
Don't expect a sensible debate with either Irene or Saad because that wouldn't be trolling and thus they wouldn't enjoy it...
Here is a snesible question. Why in the world would you make a rare trip to this forum to get involved in such a stupid argument? That would define trolling far more than getting caught up in something that started Boxing related.
beware you wrote "snesible"...that might set the end of your relationship with Irene
Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs
Posted: 08 Jun 2010, 13:36
by SaadOffTheDeck
Raff The Frenchman wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Raff The Frenchman wrote:
Don't expect a sensible debate with either Irene or Saad because that wouldn't be trolling and thus they wouldn't enjoy it...
Here is a snesible question. Why in the world would you make a rare trip to this forum to get involved in such a stupid argument? That would define trolling far more than getting caught up in something that started Boxing related.
beware you wrote "snesible"...that might set the end of your relationship with Irene
Nice answer,
