Counter-puncher wrote: i think the Murray comment was a bit of a wind-up, mate.
It was only half tongue-in-cheek to be honest.
The problem 'Barn, is that you slice and dice it to suit your pro-Murray agenda at times. Suddenly, where Murray's concerned, rankings are a credible benchmark, yet there will be other times, involving different fighters, where you will say the rankings aren't credible.
And me thinks you're being a tad disingenuous when you're saying you don't see the comparison given:
1) There's no ambiguity at all that Murray's last opponent was an uninspiring one, hence it being met with resounding apathy even by the most hardcore of fans
2) Your whole attempt to justify the fight revolved around the belief it was advancing Murray's ranking and getting him closer to a world title fight.