BoxRec

Smigga wrote:

chris11 wrote:no fighters are shitbags....adam called sykes one...thats the guy who was in one of the fights of the year with morris this year .....and undercard fight of the year last year with crolla....and can't wait for prizefighter to prove he's the best at s-feather in britain....adam lives in the world of gossip,rumours and chinese whispers...in the REAL WORLD champions need to earn money.....

Burns is the best super feather in Britain. Then Foster.... The rest is down to opinion

Sykes would have to me next for me............

Smigga wrote:

chris11 wrote:no fighters are shitbags....adam called sykes one...thats the guy who was in one of the fights of the year with morris this year .....and undercard fight of the year last year with crolla....and can't wait for prizefighter to prove he's the best at s-feather in britain....adam lives in the world of gossip,rumours and chinese whispers...in the REAL WORLD champions need to earn money.....

Burns is the best super feather in Britain. Then Foster.... The rest is down to opinion

and this is only your opinion after all u were wrong about the voluntary status

chris11 wrote:

Smigga wrote:

chris11 wrote:no fighters are shitbags....adam called sykes one...thats the guy who was in one of the fights of the year with morris this year .....and undercard fight of the year last year with crolla....and can't wait for prizefighter to prove he's the best at s-feather in britain....adam lives in the world of gossip,rumours and chinese whispers...in the REAL WORLD champions need to earn money.....

Burns is the best super feather in Britain. Then Foster.... The rest is down to opinion

and this is only your opinion after all u were wrong about the voluntary status

Listen, I was wrong because Super featherweight does not interest me one bit - why would it?
If you want to get picky and be a smart arse over who's in the know then let's do that. I said that Sykes hasn't got a voluntary because he is entering Prizefighter. THAT HAS TO BE CORRECT because if Sykes loses to a British fighter then the BBBoC have to reconsider his status as champion.

So I wasn't wrong after all.

My other point was also correct. Sykes would never make £32k in a British title fight. I'll go as far as saying he wouldn't in a European title fight either. I also know that for his management to let a reigning British champion enter Prizefighter - things must not be looking bright for his own ticket selling and earning potential.
My opinion is also spot on in saying Ricky Burns is the number one in Britain. My opinion is also he'd beat Sykes pretty easily.

can't disagree with much of this ^^^^^ esp in terms of how entering PF would make Sykes' earning potential seem right now

Smigga wrote:Listen, I was wrong because Super featherweight does not interest me one bit - why would it?

Because it is a good division with some very good domestic fights that can be made.

Horse wrote:

Smigga wrote:Listen, I was wrong because Super featherweight does not interest me one bit - why would it?

Because it is a good division with some very good domestic fights that can be made.

Your point being?
Why would that still interest me? I'm not a boxing enthusiast, I don't make ratings, I don't know the 4 main world champions at each weight.
I do know the top 25 in the world at super middle. Pay a lot of attention to the featherweights as my brother boxes at feather.

Super feather doesn't interest me. I watch it when Crolla fights or Burns.

chris11 wrote:no fighters are shitbags....adam called sykes one...thats the guy who was in one of the fights of the year with morris this year .....and undercard fight of the year last year with crolla....and can't wait for prizefighter to prove he's the best at s-feather in britain....adam lives in the world of gossip,rumours and chinese whispers...in the REAL WORLD champions need to earn money.....

do u not what had made my day the way you have come on here and bit soo much.. okay then chris just do em a favour and this question has gary turned down two fights with jonny kays or not? forget about wether hes mandatory or wether he deserves his shot or not just answer this question cheers PAL!

Smigga wrote:

Horse wrote:

Smigga wrote:Listen, I was wrong because Super featherweight does not interest me one bit - why would it?

Because it is a good division with some very good domestic fights that can be made.

Your point being?

I was giving you an answer to your question.

Smigga wrote:Why would that still interest me? I'm not a boxing enthusiast, I don't make ratings, I don't know the 4 main world champions at each weight.
I do know the top 25 in the world at super middle. Pay a lot of attention to the featherweights as my brother boxes at feather.

Super feather doesn't interest me. I watch it when Crolla fights or Burns.

I thought your question, asking why you would be interested in the Super Featherweight division, was odd. Why bother asking the question?

Horse wrote:

Smigga wrote:

Horse wrote:Because it is a good division with some very good domestic fights that can be made.

Your point being?

I was giving you an answer to your question.

Smigga wrote:Why would that still interest me? I'm not a boxing enthusiast, I don't make ratings, I don't know the 4 main world champions at each weight.
I do know the top 25 in the world at super middle. Pay a lot of attention to the featherweights as my brother boxes at feather.

Super feather doesn't interest me. I watch it when Crolla fights or Burns.

I thought your question, asking why you would be interested in the Super Featherweight division, was odd. Why bother asking the question?

To answer your question, I was asked a question by someone who suggested I should automatically KNOW who Gary Sykes was fighting next, who was his mandatory and who was his voluntary.

I didn't see where he said "Horse, answer that for me lad" or where I said "Horse, answer this for me"

Smigga wrote:To answer your question, I was asked a question by someone who suggested I should automatically KNOW who Gary Sykes was fighting next, who was his mandatory and who was his voluntary.

I didn't see where he said "Horse, answer that for me lad" or where I said "Horse, answer this for me"

If you didn't want anyone else to get involved then you should have private messaged him.

Horse wrote:

Smigga wrote:To answer your question, I was asked a question by someone who suggested I should automatically KNOW who Gary Sykes was fighting next, who was his mandatory and who was his voluntary.

I didn't see where he said "Horse, answer that for me lad" or where I said "Horse, answer this for me"

If you didn't want anyone else to get involved then you should have private messaged him.

Sorry I didn't see the rules on boxrec where it gave HORSE a bit of power?
Who are you to tell people how to post?

Give it a rest, eh.

Smigga wrote:Sorry I didn't see the rules on boxrec where it gave HORSE a bit of power?
Who are you to tell people how to post?

Give it a rest, eh.

You are the one suggesting I shouldn't respond to your posts unless I am given your permission.

Horse wrote:

Smigga wrote:Sorry I didn't see the rules on boxrec where it gave HORSE a bit of power?
Who are you to tell people how to post?

Give it a rest, eh.

You are the one suggesting I shouldn't respond to your posts unless I am given your permission.

Not at all, and if I did it would be just a suggestion. Not an order like you gave.
Let's leave the handbags here, eh?
If this carries on I'll never get in your P4P list.

smigga not an enthusiast

horse when is your next p4p listing coming out??


i think sykes beat's crolla, but is certainly second to foster & burns.

Smigga wrote:Not at all, and if I did it would be just a suggestion. Not an order like you gave.
Let's leave the handbags here, eh?

I'll leave it then, it was a bit of a crap argument anyway.

Smigga wrote:If this carries on I'll never get in your P4P list.

If you beat DeGale and I leave you out then I think people might start to suspect that I am being a little bit biased against you.

Horse wrote:

Smigga wrote:Not at all, and if I did it would be just a suggestion. Not an order like you gave.
Let's leave the handbags here, eh?

I'll leave it then, it was a bit of a crap argument anyway.

Smigga wrote:If this carries on I'll never get in your P4P list.

If you beat DeGale and I leave you out then I think people might start to suspect that I am being a little bit biased against you.

Never?

hurlock wrote:horse when is your next p4p listing coming out??

The 1st of November.

what star sighn are you horse.

hurlock wrote:what star sighn are you horse.

It's a secret.

Horse wrote:

hurlock wrote:what star sighn are you horse.

It's a secret.

no it aint, your age is DD

Sykesy hasn't boxed since May, not his fault so the fact he is going into this says 2 things. 1, the BBBC haven't yet mandated anyone to fight him, because they've set a series of eliminators. Crolla won his (not final), but now Trusscott has to fight Johansonne. What is Gazza supposed to do, wait around for this to get sorted?? Second, the kid has some balls and all the people criticising are the ones saying champions are protected these days so make up your minds. Finally a champion who says he'll step up and he gets stick for it!

As for Keys good fighter but even he wouldn't sat Sykesy is ducking him, having beaten him a few times as an amateur!!! I knw Gaz and he'll fight anybody!

Yorkshiresuperstar wrote:criticising are the ones saying champions are protected these days so make up your minds. Finally a champion who says he'll step up and he gets stick for it!

i agree with that. So what if he's British Champ, if he fancies getting in the mix to win 32 grand good on him, he's got the rest of his career to concentrate on titles.

NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:

Yorkshiresuperstar wrote:criticising are the ones saying champions are protected these days so make up your minds. Finally a champion who says he'll step up and he gets stick for it!

i agree with that. So what if he's British Champ, if he fancies getting in the mix to win 32 grand good on him, he's got the rest of his career to concentrate on titles.

Totally agree with you

Foster and Burns both got weaknesses,as has Sykes....1,2,3 has yet to be sorted!

chris11 wrote:Foster and Burns both got weaknesses,as has Sykes....1,2,3 has yet to be sorted!

No mate, #1 is sorted well and truly.
You are a Sykes fan or friend. Understandable you rate your man. Burns is the number one at the weight.