Page 4 of 12
Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 13:57
by n1ebf
tonyevs wrote:Nobody is kissing his arse - just think its good to get a straight from the heart reply from him ... kinda humanises him somewhat eh?
All of us - ok, most of us have gone off on one before now. I remember NorthEastBoxingFan going off on a very big one not so long ago.
So why not Buncey?
Nobody is kissing his arse - just think its good to get a straight from the heart reply from him ... kinda humanises him somewhat eh?
are you for real??
All of us - ok, most of us have gone off on one before now. I remember NorthEastBoxingFan going off on a very big one not so long ago
i've responded in kind when I've been trolled but I categorically have never called some poor fella a "fcking dimwit" or an education-deficient tosser just because I disagreed. That's just bad mannered and doesn't make one look very intelligent. I actually couldn't give a sh*t personally but as some people are intent on saying ".....it's OK because it's Bunce"...I thought I'd reply.
Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 14:01
by tonyevs
nobby_nobbins wrote:tonyevs wrote:
All of us - ok, most of us have gone off on one before now. I remember NorthEastBoxingFan going off on a very big one not so long ago.
So why not Buncey?
Bunce is arguably the highest profile figure covering the sport in this country. He represents boxing on national radio, television and in the newspapers, and as such has greater responsibilities than most.
Sorry mate. Just don`t agree with you on that.
So he spoke what he thought - not what he was expected. Great I say.
Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 14:05
by tonyevs
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
i've responded in kind when I've been trolled but I categorically have never called some poor fella a "fcking dimwit" or an education-deficient tosser just because I disagreed. That's just bad mannered and doesn't make one look very intelligent. I actually couldn't give a sh*t personally but as some people are intent on saying ".....it's OK because it's Bunce"...I thought I'd reply.
Didn`t you come close to being banned sometime ago for using pretty strong language towards some people on here?
If I have mistaken you for another poster - then I do apologize.
Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 14:17
by n1ebf
tonyevs wrote:NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
i've responded in kind when I've been trolled but I categorically have never called some poor fella a "fcking dimwit" or an education-deficient tosser just because I disagreed. That's just bad mannered and doesn't make one look very intelligent. I actually couldn't give a sh*t personally but as some people are intent on saying ".....it's OK because it's Bunce"...I thought I'd reply.
Didn`t you come close to being banned sometime ago for using pretty strong language towards some people on here?
If I have mistaken you for another poster - then I do apologize.
i got a warning a couple years ago for offensive comments 2 a poster. I think I've been dragged into tittle tattle by 2 people on here, one of who is now banned. I've not started it on either occasion. The 2nd poster has recently endeared himself to a new ex-boxer (World Title challenger) to the Forum by labelling him a "fcking balloon" (from behind the keyboard)

Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 16:40
by Matt W
Buncey wrote:Classy remarks etc...you have an opinion, express it and then people start crying. I think this site is starting to believe its hype!
Ron Stander would be a champion today - somebody posted that. What is that about? George was crushed and wanted just one fight. Lewis, Bowe, Holyfield, Tyson ...look at the dates.
There comes a point when enough bolloxs is simply enough, sorry if that has upset people.
Adios.
With respect it's the personal insult to decent posters that has upset people. Fair enough to debate an opinion, no need to throw out ill-founded personal insults.
Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 18:05
by Jeff Thomas
Lol at this thread! Buncey is a right nice bloke and I thought his post was funny- come on lads have a bit of a crack!
Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 18:17
by nobby_nobbins
Jeff Thomas wrote:Lol at this thread! Buncey is a right nice bloke and I thought his post was funny- come on lads have a bit of a crack!
You have quite an odd sense of humour if you think being called a dimwit and a tosser is funny.
Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 18:34
by palooka
I've been called worse and they were right; if you're so precious that a few nasty names will hurt you then you lead a sheltered life.
Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 18:43
by Jeff Thomas
nobby_nobbins wrote:Jeff Thomas wrote:Lol at this thread! Buncey is a right nice bloke and I thought his post was funny- come on lads have a bit of a crack!
You have quite an odd sense of humour if you think being called a dimwit and a tosser is funny.
I've been called far worse-
Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 18:46
by dondada
Jeff Thomas wrote:nobby_nobbins wrote:Jeff Thomas wrote:Lol at this thread! Buncey is a right nice bloke and I thought his post was funny- come on lads have a bit of a crack!
You have quite an odd sense of humour if you think being called a dimwit and a tosser is funny.
I've been called far worse-
Probably today too

Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 18:51
by Dioufy
He essentially takes the piss outta the forum and he's getting commended? Strange one. If Bunce was an actual worthwhile posters on here then fair enough, but the bloke just basically pimps out his BBC slot out on here. He would not be missed on here at all because he doesn't really post much on here at all.
Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 18:59
by Dioufy
And my misses called me a fat, lazy c*nt just because I forgot to do the dishies this morning. It's not the insult that takes this piss, it's the insinuation that this site is believeing its own hype, which it rich considering that Bunce is probably the party that is most guilty of such an accusation. Bunce, meet the kettle.
Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 19:00
by Hagler2002
Dioufy wrote:He essentially takes the piss outta the forum and he's getting commended? Strange one. If Bunce was an actual worthwhile posters on here then fair enough, but the bloke just basically pimps out his BBC slot out on here. He would not be missed on here at all because he doesn't really post much on here at all.
Its obviously just the customary leg humpers on here that feel the need to defend the so called celeb posters just incase they ever meet them in a real life situation and can get a semi hard on when they tell the story about how it tickled their cock sticking up for them on a anonymous forum.
Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 19:01
by Dioufy
Hagler2002 wrote:Dioufy wrote:He essentially takes the piss outta the forum and he's getting commended? Strange one. If Bunce was an actual worthwhile posters on here then fair enough, but the bloke just basically pimps out his BBC slot out on here. He would not be missed on here at all because he doesn't really post much on here at all.
Its obviously just the customary leg humpers on here that feel the need to defend the so called celeb posters just incase they ever meet them in a real life situation and can get a semi hard on when they tell the story about how it tickled their cock sticking up for them on a anonymous forum.
And there was me thinking you had no sense of humour.

Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 19:09
by palooka
can i hump your leg marvin
Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 19:26
by Hagler2002
simon fox wrote:can i hump your leg marvin
Yeah that's fine but in return I'll fornicate you up the arsé till you love me!
Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 19:32
by palooka
That's a bit strong mate! i just wanted a bit of comfort!

Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 19:57
by Hagler2002
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:tonyevs wrote:NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
i've responded in kind when I've been trolled but I categorically have never called some poor fella a "fcking dimwit" or an education-deficient tosser just because I disagreed. That's just bad mannered and doesn't make one look very intelligent. I actually couldn't give a sh*t personally but as some people are intent on saying ".....it's OK because it's Bunce"...I thought I'd reply.
Didn`t you come close to being banned sometime ago for using pretty strong language towards some people on here?
If I have mistaken you for another poster - then I do apologize.
i got a warning a couple years ago for offensive comments 2 a poster. I think I've been dragged into tittle tattle by 2 people on here, one of who is now banned. I've not started it on either occasion. The 2nd poster has recently endeared himself to a new ex-boxer (World Title challenger) to the Forum by labelling him a "fcking balloon" (from behind the keyboard)

I take it that's a another sly dig! I expressed an opinion that I thought Glen Foot wasn't all that (my personal opinion) to which I got challenged with "why dont ya spar him then"
I'm sure that's the way forward, if you don't think a certain boxer is going to succeed in his professional career you should jump straight into the ring with him for a 'tear up'

Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 20:49
by palooka
I think you've snapping at the wrong pair of heels there Hagler2002
Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 21:25
by Hagler2002
simon fox wrote:I think you've snapping at the wrong pair of heels there Hagler2002
No I haven't you raving huckle, which way would you like son!!!
Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 22:12
by n1ebf
Hagler2002 wrote:NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:tonyevs wrote:
Didn`t you come close to being banned sometime ago for using pretty strong language towards some people on here?
If I have mistaken you for another poster - then I do apologize.
i got a warning a couple years ago for offensive comments 2 a poster. I think I've been dragged into tittle tattle by 2 people on here, one of who is now banned. I've not started it on either occasion. The 2nd poster has recently endeared himself to a new ex-boxer (World Title challenger) to the Forum by labelling him a "fcking balloon" (from behind the keyboard)

I take it that's a another sly dig! I expressed an opinion that I thought Glen Foot wasn't all that (my personal opinion) to which I got challenged with "why dont ya spar him then"
I'm sure that's the way forward, if you don't think a certain boxer is going to succeed in his professional career you should jump straight into the ring with him for a 'tear up'

whoooaah there I didn't catch me droppin any names there, did you?? An it's not sly when it's there for all to look at exactly. Personally I've never been carried away with David Haye I thought Enzo Maccarinelli would spank him and if he phoned me up tomorrow for a spar I'd have no problem carrying him for a few rounds

Anyway don't put too much on your plate get stuck back into Bunce/ Hunter/ this week's flavour of the week etc etc..

Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 30 Jan 2011, 06:17
by Captain Hook
Bunce,
The Stander comment was tongue in cheek, hence the smiley face....anyone could see that.
And I can't believe you're accusing Boxrec posters of believing their own hype....it's only a year or so ago we were the ones fighting to keep your show on TV. Some thank you.
You're quite happy to come on here and start a thread when it's about yourself or your show etc etc.
Ill-informed, arrogant and pretty sad response tbh, but it doesn't both me personally....
Ta for the back-up though boys, or should I say 'ladies'....you ate him for breakfast
Steve obviously thinks we're the kind of 'fans' with limited knowledge, a bad attitude and beer to swill. We know different.
Adios
PS I read plenty of newspapers, I even work for them, but the internet is where it's at now Steve...try Boxrec News, you'll find a feast of boxing articles on there....you might even learn something
Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 30 Jan 2011, 06:29
by Captain Hook
PPS Who looks at Ali's record, or that of Lewis or Tyson, and points to those they didn't fight?
Lewis not fighting Tyson and Bowe was not Lewis's fault, as far as I was aware.
If that comment makes me a tosser or an effing dimwit then fine.
Most people have an opinion of Bunce, I actually don't mind him on TV but don't look to him as an authority on the sport or boxing's oracle.
I think he's proven that on this thread.
Ta very much, have a good Sunday boys and girls
Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 30 Jan 2011, 06:44
by Matt W
Wasn't a deal virtually done for Lewis-Bowe that was scuppered by Bowe's shellackings by Golota?
Re: Factual error (Colin Hart) in boxing column in Sun online
Posted: 30 Jan 2011, 07:10
by veriton
so this thread has gone from tanning colin hart to giving steve bunce a good kicking?
shame on you.
i cringed when i saw this forum get a mention in BM, knew it was only a matter of time before the BIG I AM reared its ugly head.
oooooh steve bunce was rude so i'm going to cry.....it's laughable