BoxRec

bigred83 wrote:

flogger wrote:recently a topic of conversation on talkback here has beenthe issue of woman breast feeding in public,and weather or not it is decent or no.personly i don't have a problem with it.what i do have a problem with is the state and condition in which clarance tillman presented himself in last night and has a hide to call himself an athlete {boxer}.if a woman can"t do what is pure and natural,surely this man and others alike should never be allowed to take there shirt off in public.

Love these sanctimonious turds who think their narrow minded ideas are more important than a baby getting a feed.

milpool wrote:I love the fact that Money Bill Williams won the NZ title by defeating an American.

EDIT - Just seen that he's a resident of NZ, so that must explain it...

He would have to beat another American ( Welliver) to get real recognition. Williams' belt is a relic.

I smell a rat

Clarence has not achieved much since moving to New Zealand. His losing a fight is no surprise, the importance put on the fight was ridiculous.

foxdog1923 wrote:Which one of our posters here had plenty of praise for Clarence Tillman before he fought Leamy Tato?....

Clarence Tillman who has been boxing for years, gets beaten by a virtual novice. Tillman sux

Sonny sucks too, Tillman just sucks more.

'Frilla wrote:

foxdog1923 wrote:Which one of our posters here had plenty of praise for Clarence Tillman before he fought Leamy Tato?....

Clarence Tillman who has been boxing for years, gets beaten by a virtual novice. Tillman sux

Sonny sucks too, Tillman just sucks more.

Clarence must swallow a lot as well, he has been as heavy as 301 pounds in recent times.

Brute wrote:

'Frilla wrote:

foxdog1923 wrote:Which one of our posters here had plenty of praise for Clarence Tillman before he fought Leamy Tato?....

Clarence Tillman who has been boxing for years, gets beaten by a virtual novice. Tillman sux

Sonny sucks too, Tillman just sucks more.

Clarence must swallow a lot as well, he has been as heavy as 301 pounds in recent times.

For last night's fight he weighed 128.4kgs (283lbs) SBW 107.9 (238)

[quote="buster007"]amwsnw,

again, what r u whinging for?

u knew exactly what was on offer before u went to watch it.

now u r surprised, pmsl.

the only person u should be blaming is yourself imo.[/quote

I dont think I should be blamed for supporting this great sport. The blame should be targetted solely at the promoters and those who had the hide to call this a championship bout. Dont try and turn this on me. I went there "HOPING" to see more than I did and came away disappointed. I pay to watch 99% of mainevents at home, knowing that some will disappoint. I didnt pay for this becasue I thought it would be shit...this was below shit, hence my comments !!!

Yes I know it was only a NZ belt, but a belt still....Australian boxing is in good shape !!And I must say I love Choc being there. After the comments Trout has been posting on facebook, I think I know where Chocs real interests ly, and it aint fighting a legit champ (or having any of his fighters do that).

amwsnw wrote:Yes I know it was only a NZ belt, but a belt still....Australian boxing is in good shape !!And I must say I love Choc being there. After the comments Trout has been posting on facebook, I think I know where Chocs real interests ly, and it aint fighting a legit champ (or having any of his fighters do that).

Speaking of Trout, there is an article on Fight Saga where Austin claims he wil beat Mayweather at any weight if Floyd can find the balls to fight him.
He then tells of the time that the manager of Martinez told Austin that he would be too dangerous for a fight with Sergio.
He has a radio interview soon where he will reveal why Cotto is also running scared from him. DD
It seems Austin thinks his victory over Lo Porto has made him seem unbeatable to more than just Mundine.

hearns,

wrong topic bud.

amwsnw,

wake up to yourself.

u knew it was a shit card. u went and witnessed shit fights but r now whinging that it was ordinary.

BLAME YOURSELF.

u know what u should do next time is don't go and watch it. simple as that.

buster007 wrote:hearns,

wrong topic bud.

Not according to amwsnw. DD

buster007 wrote:hearns,

wrong topic bud.

We could always go back to breastfeeding and mens tits.

Speaking of mens tits, did any one notice the rack on Evgeny Orlov. He made Tillman look flat chested.

The problem now will be getting Dunny Bill back into the ring to defend his "Claytons" New Zealand title.

Dunny now has to focus on his rugger obligations for at least the next 8 months and then he is a free agent football wise to negiotate for bigger dollars so he can continue in either Rugby code somewhere. Where boxing fits into this timetable is anyones guess!

hearns wrote:

amwsnw wrote:Yes I know it was only a NZ belt, but a belt still....Australian boxing is in good shape !!And I must say I love Choc being there. After the comments Trout has been posting on facebook, I think I know where Chocs real interests ly, and it aint fighting a legit champ (or having any of his fighters do that).

Speaking of Trout, there is an article on Fight Saga where Austin claims he wil beat Mayweather at any weight if Floyd can find the balls to fight him.
He then tells of the time that the manager of Martinez told Austin that he would be too dangerous for a fight with Sergio.
He has a radio interview soon where he will reveal why Cotto is also running scared from him. DD
It seems Austin thinks his victory over Lo Porto has made him seem unbeatable to more than just Mundine.

Mayweather has some gaol time to get out of the way before he can think about Trout.

Got to love this.... :)

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/other-spor ... -on-acting

buster007 wrote:amwsnw,

wake up to yourself.

u knew it was a shit card. u went and witnessed shit fights but r now whinging that it was ordinary.

BLAME YOURSELF.

u know what u should do next time is don't go and watch it. simple as that.

Yeah, no worries. All I was saying it was worse than I expected. I find it strange that if we are supporting the same sport that you find it ok to bag supporters or the sport, I dont bag supporters just the people i believe are ruining it....any way mate, have your say and I respect it, good on ya.

I didnt watch it, i knew it was going to be shit.

That whole show should of been on Friday night fights.

amwsnw,

look, at the end of the day, these cards will only improve, if people don't go to the pub to watch it, or pay to get it on tv.

the more the numbers drop, the more pressure on them to put on a good show. they don't want to lose money, so they improve the match-ups.

i have no problem with the dunny bill show being ppv or the fact it was for the nz title. if people r happy to pay for it, then good luck to dunny and co. for making money from them. i thought it was pathetic so i simply didn't pay.

buster007 wrote:amwsnw,

look, at the end of the day, these cards will only improve, if people don't go to the pub to watch it, or pay to get it on tv.

the more the numbers drop, the more pressure on them to put on a good show. they don't want to lose money, so they improve the match-ups.

i have no problem with the dunny bill show being ppv or the fact it was for the nz title. if people r happy to pay for it, then good luck to dunny and co. for making money from them. i thought it was pathetic so i simply didn't pay.

Exactly.

hearns wrote:

buster007 wrote:amwsnw,

look, at the end of the day, these cards will only improve, if people don't go to the pub to watch it, or pay to get it on tv.

the more the numbers drop, the more pressure on them to put on a good show. they don't want to lose money, so they improve the match-ups.

i have no problem with the dunny bill show being ppv or the fact it was for the nz title. if people r happy to pay for it, then good luck to dunny and co. for making money from them. i thought it was pathetic so i simply didn't pay.

Exactly.

I agree with not forking out money for it and there were no more than usual at the main pub in Perth showing it. Am I correct in saying that if you didnt pay for it or go to the pub,you havent seen the card ??

don't see how it matters either way tbh, but yes i did see the main fight, but i didn't pay for it or go to the pub.

What kind of mug would bother paying to watch a fight that was obviously going to be crap?

Brute wrote:What kind of mug would bother paying to watch a fight that was obviously going to be crap?

Im picking one thats a boxing nut.

Regardless there is still the curiosity of how he (SBW) was going to go.

I watched at the pub due to curiosity. Im picking thats the same for quite a few of us on here?