BoxRec

Deserter wrote:Interesting.. so facts and reality don't matter then? You seem to want evidence in the Mayweather case, yet with me, in the absence of any proof, you're happy to accuse me of bullying. Yet more hypocrisy.

Deserter wrote:Nobody is demanding that you change. What I and others are saying is that given the manner and tone of your posts you shouldn't be remotely surprised that you provoke so many adverse reactions. Many regard you as a troll. If you don't want that perception of you, you need to change. If you're comfortable with it, keep on doing what you're doing. What is utterly pointless is complaining about it.

Deserter wrote:

Datsue wrote:

Deserter wrote: Horse, whatever your faults, you're not a stupid man, so it amazes me that you're unable to grasp from the fact that you manage to alienate so many people that you have an attitude problem.
Don't try and blame it on having a difference of opinion as that's a complete red herring - every day there are posters who have differences of opinion on here yet manage to retain a healthy respect for one another. You, by contrast, have come to be regarded as a troll by a significant number of posters. That alone should tell you something.

^ Fair play mate, but I can write out his response for him to save him the bother:

"It's not fair to label me as anything when you don't know me personally. I have not made a personal attack on you, yet you do so to me because of my opinions, which are genuine. I have not trivialised women-beating, I just do not believe that the accounts we receive should be emotionally responded to without knowing all the facts. The seriousness of the crime/allegation has no bearing unless it has been proved to me."

& then we respond with "Well how can you know anything if it's got to be proved explicitly" & he'll come up with something else & on & on & on & on until we all go fvcking blind. Someone'll point out the pudendum only ever posts in threads/on topics which have an emotive or ethical component, & that he always takes a cuntish stance on everything under the sun, & we go on playing his stupid fvcking game ad infinitum as if you're talking to a human being rather than the organic equivalent of one of those "press one to be patronised by a recorded message" voice-mail things set to "I'm a pudendum".

Or, you could put him on "Ignore".

EDIT: Oh, he beat me to it. Can someone tell me if I was near the mark with my impression, please?

Horse wrote:

Deserter wrote:Interesting.. so facts and reality don't matter then? You seem to want evidence in the Mayweather case, yet with me, in the absence of any proof, you're happy to accuse me of bullying. Yet more hypocrisy.

I never accused you of bullying more than one person. Why get pedantic about my use of the word people instead of person? I don't think its use did imply that you bully more than one person.

Horse wrote:Why can't people be reasonable?

Deserter wrote:You need to learn the difference between singular and plural.

Deserter wrote:

Horse wrote:Why can't people be reasonable?

Oh, the irony...

Horse wrote:I accused you of bullying me and nobody else.

Horse wrote:I don't go around the forum attempting to bully people like you do.

Deserter wrote:

Horse wrote:I accused you of bullying me and nobody else.

Given your poor attempt at ignoring reality I'll remind you of what you wrote minutes ago on this exact same thread:

Horse wrote:I don't go around the forum attempting to bully people like you do.

Definition of PEOPLE
plural: human beings making up a group or assembly or linked by a common interest

I don't go around the forum attempting to bully a person like you do.

Horse wrote:

Deserter wrote:

Horse wrote:I accused you of bullying me and nobody else.

Given your poor attempt at ignoring reality I'll remind you of what you wrote minutes ago on this exact same thread:

Horse wrote:I don't go around the forum attempting to bully people like you do.

Definition of PEOPLE
plural: human beings making up a group or assembly or linked by a common interest

It is a minor thing to blow up into a major issue. I have already stated that I didn't intend to suggest that you are a serial bully.

I don't go around the forum attempting to bully a person like you do.

Is that better?

Deserter wrote:I'm ecstatic. Thank you. Particularly pleased that you've managed to round things off with a question in your 'trademark style'. Kevo would be proud

Ostinato wrote:
This man know his Horse

states wrote:

Ostinato wrote:
This man know his Horse

Now there's a phrase I wish I'd never uttered in Bangkok.

Ostinato wrote:In the past couple of weeks Horse has suffered a huge blow to the (little) credibility he had. He’s always had this smug, aloof, enigmatic, Thin White Duke thing going on, dropping one sentence bon mots here and there, in the hopes of causing a little ripple of annoyance, then acting all aggrieved and innocent when he achieves it.

He lost his cool on several occasions by responding to the taunts of that Palimpsest guy with abuse and insults, stupidly flattered by their professed ‘friendship’ he joined in the inane banter with the now (thankfully) departed ESB crowd, he entered into a debate over the merits of Horse Smileys, he pathetically ‘flirted’ with DrumRunner a woman from a horse forum, he is now defending a wife beater (probably in the full knowledge it would evoke a response) and acting the ‘victim’ when people understandably take him to task.

He’s gone from being a mild irritant to a complete joke.

Well done Horse.

Horse wrote:I am supposed to care what a noob thinks?

DaveBoyMorrison wrote:Horse, what kind of injuries to a woman do you consider "worth" 90 days inside?

I think he got taken to task for threatening her life as well, am sure I read that was part of his attack but cant be bothered checking.

DaveBoyMorrison wrote:Finally, have you ever witnessed a man who can handle himself beat up a woman?

Lenny wrote:Why are you being so rude?

Ostinato wrote:If I'm such a 'noob' how do you explain my familiarity with your exploits?

Your subtle, insidious trolling has long been a feature on Boxrec but you've humiliated yourself in the last few weeks (this thread being the apotheosis)

Ostinato wrote:

Horse wrote:

Lenny wrote:Why are you being so rude?

He was a tad ruder than I was and he started it.

'He started it'

No YOU 'started it' with the drivel you've been spouting on this thread, any abuse directed at you is richly deserved.

Ostinato wrote:I truly hope it never happens Horse, but I wonder of you will be quite so liberal if you or a member of your family are ever assaulted.

Ostinato wrote:Horse, you knew perfectly well that you were going evoke a negative response with your comments (as you have on many other threads) so don't play the victim (again) having achieved that.

Ostinato wrote:You were on a wind up as you always are.

Ostinato wrote:You seemed to really enjoy that stupid Horse gif your ESB friends kept posting, perhaps you'll like this one too?

Ostinato wrote:

Horse wrote:

Ostinato wrote:You were on a wind up as you always are.

You said you aren't a noob, so who were you? I can't be bothered wasting my time arguing with an unaccountable noob with a pathetic agenda.

What's your 'agenda' Horse?

Horse wrote:so you can insult me without consequence?

Dan Dares wrote:Well Horse

Having been a fan of your P4P lists (not necessarily for their accuracy, but more for the fact that someone bothered to do it), I'm very disappointed in you.

I admired, to a point, your vociferous defence of your picks, which were sometimes are f**king mile off. Turns out you just like a keyboard ruck, and you probably chuck a few dodgy ones in there just to start the ball rolling.

There's probably some sort of syndrome for what you've got. Black is White syndrome or Argumentative C**t syndrome or something. Having worked in a few boozers, I've met plenty like you.

If you actually agree with some of the statements you've made, then you are a P4P c**t.

Sort yourself out, otherwise you won't have any keyboard friends.

Any questions or criticisms of this statement are welcomed.