Re: FW slags Froch opponent run, except for Johnson
Posted: 20 Nov 2012, 05:57
Frank column was even more ridiculous than normal............... he's let himself down again 
in the context of the entire piece it was just another dropping in the moundSamWise72 wrote:I'm not campaigning for Calzaghe to have fought Froch, even if it might look like it. Did sound like Allegedly was saying he wanted to and Froch ducked him, but I don't buy that.
froch and hearn joked about it in the post fight presser. the sun boxing guy even got a bit defensive about it and disassociated himself from it. just wish the editors had balls to reject crud like that. i write better pieces and i've only been doing it a few months.Chambers2 wrote:Frank column was even more ridiculous than normal............... he's let himself down again
i think thats a very important point.SamWise72 wrote:Joe left so many unanswered questions; Froch will leave few if any.
It's on a par with wartime propaganda for one-sided journalism, but we have to remember what shitehole paper it's invxrandall wrote:froch and hearn joked about it in the post fight presser. the sun boxing guy even got a bit defensive about it and disassociated himself from it. just wish the editors had balls to reject crud like that. i write better pieces and i've only been doing it a few months.Chambers2 wrote:Frank column was even more ridiculous than normal............... he's let himself down again
I agree apart from the Hopkins bit, Hopkins was the one who pulled the plug on a fight with Joe in 2002 because he demanded more money, not Joes fault really.SamWise72 wrote:I also can't see how Froch beats Calzaghe either. What I do think is that Froch would have gone to Germany and both fought and beaten Ottke, got himself outclassed by RJJ when he was still a force, and fought B-Hop earlier, which I think would have been a great fight (if he had reigned when Calzaghe did). Joe left so many unanswered questions; Froch will leave few if any.
banjo wrote:Joe needed a kick up the backside for him to step up, I think it was his dad calling him every name under the sun to prevent him from pulling out against Lacy.
I suspect that would have been a clincher yes.G0mez wrote:banjo wrote:Joe needed a kick up the backside for him to step up, I think it was his dad calling him every name under the sun to prevent him from pulling out against Lacy.
It was the reported $120,000 fine that Gary Shaw had put in the contract after the previous messing about had cost Jeff Lacy the chance of fighting someone else.
So you think Froch will be able to magically get a Ward rematch just because he said he was 'targetting' it?vxrandall wrote:
we know EXACTLY what we have with froch. and within 18 months we will probably have the complete story.
that is a good point. if this forum had any say in who achieves what, froch, haye and others would be in little more than commonwealth/EBU level fights.SamWise72 wrote:You miss the point. People were dismissing Froch at the time. Not just on his challenge to Calzaghe, which was unwarranted, but on his ability to go anywhere beyond British title level. I recall reading "Froch is a joke", and "He has no defence, he'll get knocked spark out the first time he meets anyone of quality". And this was after he beat Reid.The Dark Destroyer wrote:No-one is dismissing anyone. But you can't seriously think Froch should have been in contention for a fight with Calzaghe at any point really? Calzaghe fought his last ever fight before Froch even fought Pascal. Their careers simply didn't crossover at a stage where the fight was warranted, it's as simple as that.
None of it matters with Froch now, but I wonder who else is currently being dismissed who later, we'll be eulogizing. Why not enjoy fighters now?
Dan Dares wrote:x 2rhino222 wrote:as a boxer froch is definately not great, there are a multitude of better boxers, many of whom froch has beaten!
why?
because froch is a better fighter with bigger balls!!