Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

For RBR threads only
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46602
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by gilgamesh »

Good stoppage, Demarco was taking a hellacious beating
victor-romeo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1635
Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by victor-romeo »

Sonny Fiston wrote:DeMarco's ring IQ is non-existent, and Adrian Boner sounds like he's getting gangraped when he throws punches.
hhahahahahahh
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by Rover »

Bobbyptsd wrote:
victor-romeo wrote:does gamboa still fight..?
He's fighting Dec 8th, if i'm not mistaken.

Vs. Miguel Beltran Jr.

Been off for a little over a year.
Correct.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by Rover »

Diamond WEAPON wrote:
Bobbyptsd wrote:
victor-romeo wrote:does gamboa still fight..?
He's fighting Dec 8th, if i'm not mistaken.

Vs. Miguel Beltran Jr.

Been off for a little over a year.
Beltran eh? That's a tough one for most
:TU:
Blodhemn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2848
Joined: 04 Jun 2006, 20:30

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by Blodhemn »

Couldn't come any sooner. Was getting tired of seeing Demarco just standing there taking punches.
EduardosFist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 238
Joined: 17 Feb 2010, 02:13

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by EduardosFist »

Cantonio Demarco. yawn.

next.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by Rover »

Sonny Fiston wrote:DeMarco's ring IQ is non-existent, and Adrian Boner sounds like he's getting gangraped when he throws punches.
:lol:
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by crusader »

Who can beat Broner at 135?
victor-romeo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1635
Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by victor-romeo »

:TU:
The Dark Destroyer wrote:This was inevitable after the fourth. Broner looked fantastic at times, particularly the fifth.
the round demarco tried to fight inside.. and got worn down big time, from then on he was done..
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17499
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by Baby Face Finster »

It took Valero longer to beat DeMarco but he took way less punches than Broner did. If Broner gets tagged like that against someone like Gamboa he is going to sleep. I am not impressed with this Mayweather clone.
victor-romeo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1635
Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by victor-romeo »

crusader wrote:Who can beat Broner at 135?
Gamboa with a warm up fight..
Bobbyptsd
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1859
Joined: 24 Apr 2011, 00:58

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by Bobbyptsd »

crusader wrote:Who can beat Broner at 135?
Gamboa if he winds up there.

That's it, imo.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by Rover »

EduardosFist wrote:Cantonio Demarco. yawn.

next.
:lol:
Blodhemn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2848
Joined: 04 Jun 2006, 20:30

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by Blodhemn »

Lol....bake em and eat em... No homo.
victor-romeo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1635
Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by victor-romeo »

Baby Face Finster wrote:It took Valero longer to beat DeMarco but he took way less punches than Broner did. If Broner gets tagged like that against someone like Gamboa he is going to sleep. I am not impressed with this Mayweather clone.
This is the first fight he impressed me against a legit similar sized opponent..
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46602
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by gilgamesh »

Shake 'em, bake 'em, cook 'em and eat 'em, no homo?

:lol:
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by Rover »

Bobbyptsd wrote:
crusader wrote:Who can beat Broner at 135?
Gamboa if he winds up there.

That's it, imo.
Don't sleep on Vazquez.
Bobbyptsd
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1859
Joined: 24 Apr 2011, 00:58

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by Bobbyptsd »

Rover wrote:
Bobbyptsd wrote:
crusader wrote:Who can beat Broner at 135?
Gamboa if he winds up there.

That's it, imo.
Don't sleep on Vazquez.
I will in this case. Broner does him with relative ease, I believe.

Not as easy as this was, but comfortably.

Just wanted to add a fun fact, was doing some research, guess who Vazquez last loss was against?

Saul Alvarez, at 148 lbs :o

EDIT: And guess who his FIRST loss was against, in his first fight as a pro?



You guessed it
Last edited by Bobbyptsd on 18 Nov 2012, 00:33, edited 2 times in total.
Blodhemn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2848
Joined: 04 Jun 2006, 20:30

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by Blodhemn »

gilgamesh wrote:Shake 'em, bake 'em, cook 'em and eat 'em, no homo?

:lol:
He's no Dahmer.
Diamond WEAPON
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1729
Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 01:32

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by Diamond WEAPON »

Blodhemn wrote:Lol....bake em and eat em... No homo.
He needs a ghostwriter. He's not that clever
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17499
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by Baby Face Finster »

victor-romeo wrote:
Baby Face Finster wrote:It took Valero longer to beat DeMarco but he took way less punches than Broner did. If Broner gets tagged like that against someone like Gamboa he is going to sleep. I am not impressed with this Mayweather clone.
This is the first fight he impressed me against a legit similar sized opponent..
It's going to take beating some more mobile and smarter in the ring than Antonio DeMarco to impress me. If he beats Gamboa then I would be impressed.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by Rover »

Diamond WEAPON wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:Lol....bake em and eat em... No homo.
He needs a ghostwriter. He's not that clever
:TU:
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17499
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by Baby Face Finster »

Diamond WEAPON wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:Lol....bake em and eat em... No homo.
He needs a ghostwriter. He's not that clever
I think the 5 kids already made that obvious.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46602
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by gilgamesh »

gilgamesh wrote:Shake 'em, bake 'em, cook 'em and eat 'em, no homo?

:lol:
I wasn't laughing cuz I thought it was funny, I was laughing cuz I thought it was stupid. Amusing, but stupid. As long as the guy can get it done in the ring though, that's all that matters. You ain't gotta be a genius to knock mofo's out
Diamond WEAPON
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1729
Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 01:32

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Post by Diamond WEAPON »

gilgamesh wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:Shake 'em, bake 'em, cook 'em and eat 'em, no homo?

:lol:
I wasn't laughing cuz I thought it was funny, I was laughing cuz I thought it was stupid. Amusing, but stupid. As long as the guy can get it done in the ring though, that's all that matters. You ain't gotta be a genius to knock mofo's out
Cue Leon Spinks
Post Reply