Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
Good stoppage, Demarco was taking a hellacious beating
-
victor-romeo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1635
- Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
hhahahahahahhSonny Fiston wrote:DeMarco's ring IQ is non-existent, and Adrian Boner sounds like he's getting gangraped when he throws punches.
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
Correct.Bobbyptsd wrote:He's fighting Dec 8th, if i'm not mistaken.victor-romeo wrote:does gamboa still fight..?
Vs. Miguel Beltran Jr.
Been off for a little over a year.
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
Diamond WEAPON wrote:Beltran eh? That's a tough one for mostBobbyptsd wrote:He's fighting Dec 8th, if i'm not mistaken.victor-romeo wrote:does gamboa still fight..?
Vs. Miguel Beltran Jr.
Been off for a little over a year.
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
Couldn't come any sooner. Was getting tired of seeing Demarco just standing there taking punches.
-
EduardosFist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 238
- Joined: 17 Feb 2010, 02:13
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
Cantonio Demarco. yawn.
next.
next.
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
Sonny Fiston wrote:DeMarco's ring IQ is non-existent, and Adrian Boner sounds like he's getting gangraped when he throws punches.
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
Who can beat Broner at 135?
-
victor-romeo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1635
- Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
the round demarco tried to fight inside.. and got worn down big time, from then on he was done..The Dark Destroyer wrote:This was inevitable after the fourth. Broner looked fantastic at times, particularly the fifth.
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17499
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
It took Valero longer to beat DeMarco but he took way less punches than Broner did. If Broner gets tagged like that against someone like Gamboa he is going to sleep. I am not impressed with this Mayweather clone.
-
victor-romeo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1635
- Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
Gamboa with a warm up fight..crusader wrote:Who can beat Broner at 135?
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
Gamboa if he winds up there.crusader wrote:Who can beat Broner at 135?
That's it, imo.
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
EduardosFist wrote:Cantonio Demarco. yawn.
next.
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
Lol....bake em and eat em... No homo.
-
victor-romeo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1635
- Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
This is the first fight he impressed me against a legit similar sized opponent..Baby Face Finster wrote:It took Valero longer to beat DeMarco but he took way less punches than Broner did. If Broner gets tagged like that against someone like Gamboa he is going to sleep. I am not impressed with this Mayweather clone.
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
Shake 'em, bake 'em, cook 'em and eat 'em, no homo?

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
Don't sleep on Vazquez.Bobbyptsd wrote:Gamboa if he winds up there.crusader wrote:Who can beat Broner at 135?
That's it, imo.
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
I will in this case. Broner does him with relative ease, I believe.Rover wrote:Don't sleep on Vazquez.Bobbyptsd wrote:Gamboa if he winds up there.crusader wrote:Who can beat Broner at 135?
That's it, imo.
Not as easy as this was, but comfortably.
Just wanted to add a fun fact, was doing some research, guess who Vazquez last loss was against?
Saul Alvarez, at 148 lbs
EDIT: And guess who his FIRST loss was against, in his first fight as a pro?
You guessed it
Last edited by Bobbyptsd on 18 Nov 2012, 00:33, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
He's no Dahmer.gilgamesh wrote:Shake 'em, bake 'em, cook 'em and eat 'em, no homo?
-
Diamond WEAPON
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1729
- Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 01:32
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
He needs a ghostwriter. He's not that cleverBlodhemn wrote:Lol....bake em and eat em... No homo.
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17499
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
It's going to take beating some more mobile and smarter in the ring than Antonio DeMarco to impress me. If he beats Gamboa then I would be impressed.victor-romeo wrote:This is the first fight he impressed me against a legit similar sized opponent..Baby Face Finster wrote:It took Valero longer to beat DeMarco but he took way less punches than Broner did. If Broner gets tagged like that against someone like Gamboa he is going to sleep. I am not impressed with this Mayweather clone.
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
Diamond WEAPON wrote:He needs a ghostwriter. He's not that cleverBlodhemn wrote:Lol....bake em and eat em... No homo.
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17499
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
I think the 5 kids already made that obvious.Diamond WEAPON wrote:He needs a ghostwriter. He's not that cleverBlodhemn wrote:Lol....bake em and eat em... No homo.
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
I wasn't laughing cuz I thought it was funny, I was laughing cuz I thought it was stupid. Amusing, but stupid. As long as the guy can get it done in the ring though, that's all that matters. You ain't gotta be a genius to knock mofo's outgilgamesh wrote:Shake 'em, bake 'em, cook 'em and eat 'em, no homo?
-
Diamond WEAPON
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1729
- Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 01:32
Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.
Cue Leon Spinksgilgamesh wrote:I wasn't laughing cuz I thought it was funny, I was laughing cuz I thought it was stupid. Amusing, but stupid. As long as the guy can get it done in the ring though, that's all that matters. You ain't gotta be a genius to knock mofo's outgilgamesh wrote:Shake 'em, bake 'em, cook 'em and eat 'em, no homo?