Page 4 of 5

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:21
by gilgamesh
Good stoppage, Demarco was taking a hellacious beating

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:21
by victor-romeo
Sonny Fiston wrote:DeMarco's ring IQ is non-existent, and Adrian Boner sounds like he's getting gangraped when he throws punches.
hhahahahahahh

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:21
by Rover
Bobbyptsd wrote:
victor-romeo wrote:does gamboa still fight..?
He's fighting Dec 8th, if i'm not mistaken.

Vs. Miguel Beltran Jr.

Been off for a little over a year.
Correct.

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:22
by Rover
Diamond WEAPON wrote:
Bobbyptsd wrote:
victor-romeo wrote:does gamboa still fight..?
He's fighting Dec 8th, if i'm not mistaken.

Vs. Miguel Beltran Jr.

Been off for a little over a year.
Beltran eh? That's a tough one for most
:TU:

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:23
by Blodhemn
Couldn't come any sooner. Was getting tired of seeing Demarco just standing there taking punches.

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:23
by EduardosFist
Cantonio Demarco. yawn.

next.

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:24
by Rover
Sonny Fiston wrote:DeMarco's ring IQ is non-existent, and Adrian Boner sounds like he's getting gangraped when he throws punches.
:lol:

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:24
by crusader
Who can beat Broner at 135?

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:24
by victor-romeo
:TU:
The Dark Destroyer wrote:This was inevitable after the fourth. Broner looked fantastic at times, particularly the fifth.
the round demarco tried to fight inside.. and got worn down big time, from then on he was done..

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:25
by Baby Face Finster
It took Valero longer to beat DeMarco but he took way less punches than Broner did. If Broner gets tagged like that against someone like Gamboa he is going to sleep. I am not impressed with this Mayweather clone.

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:25
by victor-romeo
crusader wrote:Who can beat Broner at 135?
Gamboa with a warm up fight..

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:25
by Bobbyptsd
crusader wrote:Who can beat Broner at 135?
Gamboa if he winds up there.

That's it, imo.

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:25
by Rover
EduardosFist wrote:Cantonio Demarco. yawn.

next.
:lol:

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:26
by Blodhemn
Lol....bake em and eat em... No homo.

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:26
by victor-romeo
Baby Face Finster wrote:It took Valero longer to beat DeMarco but he took way less punches than Broner did. If Broner gets tagged like that against someone like Gamboa he is going to sleep. I am not impressed with this Mayweather clone.
This is the first fight he impressed me against a legit similar sized opponent..

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:26
by gilgamesh
Shake 'em, bake 'em, cook 'em and eat 'em, no homo?

:lol:

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:27
by Rover
Bobbyptsd wrote:
crusader wrote:Who can beat Broner at 135?
Gamboa if he winds up there.

That's it, imo.
Don't sleep on Vazquez.

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:28
by Bobbyptsd
Rover wrote:
Bobbyptsd wrote:
crusader wrote:Who can beat Broner at 135?
Gamboa if he winds up there.

That's it, imo.
Don't sleep on Vazquez.
I will in this case. Broner does him with relative ease, I believe.

Not as easy as this was, but comfortably.

Just wanted to add a fun fact, was doing some research, guess who Vazquez last loss was against?

Saul Alvarez, at 148 lbs :o

EDIT: And guess who his FIRST loss was against, in his first fight as a pro?



You guessed it

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:29
by Blodhemn
gilgamesh wrote:Shake 'em, bake 'em, cook 'em and eat 'em, no homo?

:lol:
He's no Dahmer.

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:31
by Diamond WEAPON
Blodhemn wrote:Lol....bake em and eat em... No homo.
He needs a ghostwriter. He's not that clever

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:34
by Baby Face Finster
victor-romeo wrote:
Baby Face Finster wrote:It took Valero longer to beat DeMarco but he took way less punches than Broner did. If Broner gets tagged like that against someone like Gamboa he is going to sleep. I am not impressed with this Mayweather clone.
This is the first fight he impressed me against a legit similar sized opponent..
It's going to take beating some more mobile and smarter in the ring than Antonio DeMarco to impress me. If he beats Gamboa then I would be impressed.

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:35
by Rover
Diamond WEAPON wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:Lol....bake em and eat em... No homo.
He needs a ghostwriter. He's not that clever
:TU:

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:37
by Baby Face Finster
Diamond WEAPON wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:Lol....bake em and eat em... No homo.
He needs a ghostwriter. He's not that clever
I think the 5 kids already made that obvious.

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:39
by gilgamesh
gilgamesh wrote:Shake 'em, bake 'em, cook 'em and eat 'em, no homo?

:lol:
I wasn't laughing cuz I thought it was funny, I was laughing cuz I thought it was stupid. Amusing, but stupid. As long as the guy can get it done in the ring though, that's all that matters. You ain't gotta be a genius to knock mofo's out

Re: Broner/DeMarco and Mitchell/Banks RBR 11/17.

Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 00:39
by Diamond WEAPON
gilgamesh wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:Shake 'em, bake 'em, cook 'em and eat 'em, no homo?

:lol:
I wasn't laughing cuz I thought it was funny, I was laughing cuz I thought it was stupid. Amusing, but stupid. As long as the guy can get it done in the ring though, that's all that matters. You ain't gotta be a genius to knock mofo's out
Cue Leon Spinks