BoxRec

Syntax Error wrote:Why such a long wait?

I know David needs time to heal, but Februrary is pushing it.

I also don't believe that Tyson would want to be sat around until February waiting to fight.

David Haye is contracted to do ITV's Dancing On Ice.

No joke!

Maxsplit wrote:

Syntax Error wrote:Why such a long wait?

I know David needs time to heal, but Februrary is pushing it.

I also don't believe that Tyson would want to be sat around until February waiting to fight.

David Haye is contracted to do ITV's Dancing On Ice.

No joke!

If Haye has delayed this fight even further for Skiding on shit then I hope Fury kicks his arse!

I'm calling bull shit on that!!

The ice thing normally runs Jan and feb after the dancing has been on beeb per xmas.

So no way he can take part in it during training camp that close.

If anyone's got 2 tickets they want to sell, let me know as I'm after 2 tickets for the new date.

If you are so suggestible you take your information from words spoken by faceless freaks on internet forums then quite frankly you are a moron and deserve to spend your life being misled and confused.

What I'm irked about is why it takes five months for a cut to heal? Five weeks, okay. Five months? Ridiculous.

This should be a nice fat Christmas turkey for all of us, not some dismal February affair when the momentum is dead.

Fury can take on a no hoper or someone without much of a bang, in the meantime, just to keep busy. Oh wait, that's pretty much all his opponents to date

So won't be anything different there and not that it will make any difference. Haye smashes this lump whenever they fight.

bengulnaci1 wrote:Fury can take on a no hoper or someone without much of a bang, in the meantime, just to keep busy. Oh wait, that's pretty much all his opponents to date

So won't be anything different there and not that it will make any difference. Haye smashes this lump whenever they fight.

I heard that Haye cut himself deliberately, because he was too scared to fight Fury?

bengulnaci1 wrote:Fury can take on a no hoper or someone without much of a bang, in the meantime, just to keep busy. Oh wait, that's pretty much all his opponents to date

Fury has fought good opposition throughout his career. He is currently ranked in the world's top 10 based on his opposition, so don't talk daft about him fighting bums.

bengulnaci1 wrote:So won't be anything different there and not that it will make any difference. Haye smashes this lump whenever they fight.

Haye's getting dominated and stopped if he ever fights Fury.

Horse wrote:Haye's getting dominated and stopped if he ever fights Fury.

What makes you so sure? Haye will be by far the best fighter Fury has been in with, and Haye hits hard and is a great finsiher. He won't let Fury off the hook the way fighters have in the past.

I like both fighters, and part of me wants Fury to win just because he is expected to lose by most people, but I can't see how he beats Haye.

Haye wins everyday of the week. It wouldnt last more than a handful of rounds.

pyenest77 wrote:Haye wins everyday of the week. It wouldnt last more than a handful of rounds.

5 if you want to get specific

SNG wrote:What makes you so sure? Haye will be by far the best fighter Fury has been in with, and Haye hits hard and is a great finsiher. He won't let Fury off the hook the way fighters have in the past.

I think Haye is hugely overrated at heavyweight, he's the British Broner.

Heavyweight Haye: Barrett (big deal), Valuev (arguably lost), Ruiz (washed up), Harrison (great win), Klitschko (lost via domination) & Chisora (Fury's leftovers).

Fury is better than anyone Haye has beaten at heavyweight. Why is Haye considered to be so good by so many?

SNG wrote:I like both fighters, and part of me wants Fury to win just because he is expected to lose by most people, but I can't see how he beats Haye.

He can beat Haye by using his size and treating him like a blown up cruiserweight.

Horse wrote:

SNG wrote:What makes you so sure? Haye will be by far the best fighter Fury has been in with, and Haye hits hard and is a great finsiher. He won't let Fury off the hook the way fighters have in the past.

I think Haye is hugely overrated at heavyweight, he's the British Broner.

Heavyweight Haye: Barrett (big deal), Valuev (arguably lost), Ruiz (washed up), Harrison (great win), Klitschko (lost via domination) & Chisora (Fury's leftovers).

Fury is better than anyone Haye has beaten at heavyweight. Why is Haye considered to be so good by so many?

SNG wrote:I like both fighters, and part of me wants Fury to win just because he is expected to lose by most people, but I can't see how he beats Haye.

He can beat Haye by using his size and treating him like a blown up cruiserweight.

John McDermott? (well he lost the 1st one to a bloke Price pulverised) Zack Page (trialhorse) ? Marcelo Luiz Nascimento? Who? Dereck Chisora? Decent win over woefully out of shape opponent. Haye decimated a much better, fitter version. Nicolai Firtha (trialhorse)? Neven Pajkic? Who? Martin Rogan (positively creaking) Vinny Maddalone? (see Marty Rogan) Kevin Johnson? (see Marty Rogan) Steve Cunningham? (bloated CW) and two of these guys dropped Fury hard. Enough said.

Fury's mouth and hype have done their job, making a believer out of people like you. Say whatever you want but there is very, very little to substantiate any of what you say. Your just going on your own opinion and dislike for Haye. Fair enough but to suggest Fury will win because Haye isn't much or his opponents have been poor or that he has poor stamina or that Fury is his one of best opponents etc...is just silly, especially when the facts clearly contradict all of this.

Fury could win, as in boxing you never know, but from what I have seen of both and I have watched practically all of their fights, I strong, very strongly believe Haye will win.

We will see.

"Fury's leftovers" is a ridiculous spin to put on Chisora. Fury survived Chisora who went on to get into shape and give Helenius and Klitschko great fights while Fury was participating in pub brawls with fat men on 5. That Haye whacked him is a highly impressive result, given that the three giants couldn't even dent him.

Fury's leftovers! Unbelievable. It takes that level of denial and willful blindness to lead a man into a prediction such as Fury dominating and stopping Haye.

To dismiss Haye's opponents while defending Fury's clubfighter scalps is berserk.

Haye by KO in whatever round he pleases in whatever month it takes place.

Does anyone know if a new batch of tickets will go on sale and if so when?

There must be a decent proportion of people who can't make the new date and will be handing their tickets back

loaded_gloves wrote:Haye by KO in whatever round he pleases in whatever month it takes place.

Sure he does.

bengulnaci1 wrote:Fury's mouth and hype have done their job, making a believer out of people like you. Say whatever you want but there is very, very little to substantiate any of what you say. Your just going on your own opinion and dislike for Haye. Fair enough but to suggest Fury will win because Haye isn't much or his opponents have been poor or that he has poor stamina or that Fury is his one of best opponents etc...is just silly, especially when the facts clearly contradict all of this.

The facts do not contradict it. Fury would be Haye's best clear win at heavyweight if he can beat him clearly. Valuev might be better than Fury on paper, but Haye didn't beat him clearly and I think Fury would beat that Valuev if he fought him.

bengulnaci1 wrote:Fury could win, as in boxing you never know, but from what I have seen of both and I have watched practically all of their fights, I strong, very strongly believe Haye will win.

If Fury wins I don't want people dismissing it as a fluke and saying I'm still an idiot for picking him or any nonsense like that.

Horse you've never rated fury so heavily in the past so why now?? Seems you like to argue.

I'm no haye fan would love to see him truly humbled, but to suggest he's the underdog is pretty dumb.
I think fury has the tools,desire & will to impose himself on haye but he could easily & cruelly be wiped out.
Haye has mixed with quality & is at that level. Tyson is unproven at this point & to suggest he will dominate & dispose of haye is premature

Horse wrote:The facts do not contradict it. Fury would be Haye's best clear win at heavyweight if he can beat him clearly. Valuev might be better than Fury on paper, but Haye didn't beat him clearly and I think Fury would beat that Valuev if he fought him.

The facts do contradict it. Haye clearly beat Valuev. Clearly and rocked him to his boots. As for Fury beating him, for a guy who struggled past McDermott, got dropped by a couple of non punchers and faced limited / poor opponents, at best, I don't think he would.

Horse wrote:If Fury wins I don't want people dismissing it as a fluke and saying I'm still an idiot for picking him or any nonsense like that.

What about if Fury loses? What then?

squared circle wrote:I'm calling bull poo on that!!

The ice thing normally runs Jan and feb after the dancing has been on beeb per xmas.

So no way he can take part in it during training camp that close.

Maxsplit wrote:

Syntax Error wrote:Why such a long wait?

I know David needs time to heal, but Februrary is pushing it.

I also don't believe that Tyson would want to be sat around until February waiting to fight.

David Haye is contracted to do ITV's Dancing On Ice.

No joke!

I really hope that is a joke because if not the guy is a grade A pudendum

columbo wrote:

Maxsplit wrote:

Syntax Error wrote:Why such a long wait?

I know David needs time to heal, but Februrary is pushing it.

I also don't believe that Tyson would want to be sat around until February waiting to fight.

David Haye is contracted to do ITV's Dancing On Ice.

No joke!

I really hope that is a joke because if not the guy is a grade A pudendum

Why?

columbo wrote:

Maxsplit wrote:

Syntax Error wrote:Why such a long wait?

I know David needs time to heal, but Februrary is pushing it.

I also don't believe that Tyson would want to be sat around until February waiting to fight.

David Haye is contracted to do ITV's Dancing On Ice.

No joke!

I really hope that is a joke because if not the guy is a grade A pudendum

Why?[/quote]

Because he should be concentrating on getting himself back in shape and healing instead of focussing on being on some utterly dog shite tv show. Especially when people are disappointed with the fight just being postponed. He seems to care more about being some Z list celebrity than he does on actually boxing.

columbo wrote: Because he should be concentrating on getting himself back in shape and healing instead of focussing on being on some utterly dog shite tv show. Especially when people are disappointed with the fight just being postponed. He seems to care more about being some Z list celebrity than he does on actually boxing.

So he should postpone a tv appearance because people are upset that a fight got rescheduled because of an injury? Are you joking?

How does he go about concentrating on healing? Can't he ice skate with a cut on his eyebrow?

hurlock wrote:Horse you've never rated fury so heavily in the past so why now??

Yes, I have.

hurlock wrote:Seems you like to argue.

I disagree with the majority. What is your problem with that?

hurlock wrote:I'm no haye fan would love to see him truly humbled, but to suggest he's the underdog is pretty dumb.
I think fury has the tools,desire & will to impose himself on haye but he could easily & cruelly be wiped out.
Haye has mixed with quality & is at that level. Tyson is unproven at this point & to suggest he will dominate & dispose of haye is premature

Fury's wins at heavyweight are almost as good as Haye's.