BoxRec

palooka wrote:It has gone to poo and you making 18 posts a day is a big part of that

How about you go die in a fire?[/quote]

That's a bit harsh pal; he's his opinion and I don't think that you're to blame for any 'decline'; I imagine that cliques build and then fold, when you or I get a proper life then we may not post here; (I am intrigued by the members that watch the treads and read the posts but don't post themselves - they must be very disciplined).[/quote]

When I find it necessary, I occasionally descend from the Olympian heights I repose upon to offer my opinions to the simpletons and bums like yourself, palooka.

Teddy's Toupee wrote:

palooka wrote:It has gone to poo and you making 18 posts a day is a big part of that

How about you go die in a fire?

That's a bit harsh pal; he's his opinion and I don't think that you're to blame for any 'decline'; I imagine that cliques build and then fold, when you or I get a proper life then we may not post here; (I am intrigued by the members that watch the treads and read the posts but don't post themselves - they must be very disciplined).[/quote]
When I find it necessary, I occasionally descend from the Olympian heights I repose upon to offer my opinions to the simpletons and bums like yourself, palooka.[/quote]

Touche, Toupee.

Sad to see the lack of respect around here.
Agree its a chance for everyone to have their voice and that's to be welcomed but Columbo ffs what sort of comment is that ?
I think you owe Lenny an apology - forget about boxing.

It must be the Scottish side of me coming out. Sorry palooka.

you should try sugar on your porridge instead of salt, it'll mellow you out man

Parson Cross wrote:Sad to see the lack of respect around here.
Agree its a chance for everyone to have their voice and that's to be welcomed but Columbo ffs what sort of comment is that ?
I think you owe Lenny an apology - forget about boxing.

If someone makes a bitchy comment to me il reply in kind. I apologise for the nature of the comment as it was too extreme admittedly but like I said you cant expect me to be all friendly if you make snide remarks.

Not the heartfelt apology we were hoping for columbo; you should say sorry and mean it else you'll be on the naughty step, (and don't slope off to the interaction thread and slag me off coz I'm going there in a minute as well )

palooka wrote:Not the heartfelt apology we were hoping for columbo; you should say sorry and mean it else you'll be on the naughty step, (and don't slope off to the interaction thread and slag me off coz I'm going there in a minute as well )

Alright Lenny, I apologise for the nature of my comment. It was out of line admittedly.

In the last few weeks on here I've seen the following:

1. Lennox Lewis wasnt actually very good
2. Carl Froch is not that good and his level of competition is average
3. Anthony Joshua will do nowt (an assessment based on 1 fight)
4. Kell Brook's win against Senchenko is not that good

And people wonder why I say this board is going to the dogs.

I'm all for open opinion, its what makes message boards what they are, however when said opinion is clearly shite am I not allowed to say so??

gazza8 wrote:Good punches to finish it, but waaaay to easy to hit, I thought the upright stance would have evolved as he progressed in his career but it it going to cost him. He simply doesn't have the reflexes to carry it off. Was hurt by the shot and any prime fighter would have done the job.

And someone please count. . . How many times in last several bouts has this clown told us Kell has "spite" in his punches?

Who is he trying to convince?

The shot that wobbled Brook was on his temple, not his chin.

Wrists wrote:In the last few weeks on here I've seen the following:

1. Lennox Lewis wasnt actually very good
2. Carl Froch is not that good and his level of competition is average
3. Anthony Joshua will do nowt (an assessment based on 1 fight)
4. Kell Brook's win against Senchenko is not that good

And people wonder why I say this board is going to the dogs.

I'm all for open opinion, its what makes message boards what they are, however when said opinion is clearly shite am I not allowed to say so??

But there have been thousands of individual posts and a couple of hundred threads that are more realistic; there will always be people making outlandish statements, mainly to get attention; in the good old days there will have been as well.

palooka wrote:

Wrists wrote:In the last few weeks on here I've seen the following:

1. Lennox Lewis wasnt actually very good
2. Carl Froch is not that good and his level of competition is average
3. Anthony Joshua will do nowt (an assessment based on 1 fight)
4. Kell Brook's win against Senchenko is not that good

And people wonder why I say this board is going to the dogs.

I'm all for open opinion, its what makes message boards what they are, however when said opinion is clearly shite am I not allowed to say so??

But there have been thousands of individual posts and a couple of hundred threads that are more realistic; there will always be people making outlandish statements, mainly to get attention; in the good old days there will have been as well.

Fair point mate although it just seems like there's more and more shite recently.
I'm not normally someone who yearns for the 'good old days' but I find myself shaking my head more often than not on here recently

It may be a phase, there are more good here than bad I think

All I say is that there are some great fights out there for kel and I agree most are elite and for kel it would b better if he boxed them in the uk and gained home advantage

For the same reason rose and burns needed home advantage?

palooka wrote:I agree Froch has been stunned but at world/elite level. . . . Not by a 36 year old who got stopped by PM and biggest knock out is a body shot to an ex drug addict/alcoholic who hadn't boxed in 3 years

are you Jeremy Kyle?[/quote]

Who??

If he knows a bit about boxing and states facts about boxing, on a BOXING forum I might be

If he's a talk show host that is watched and know by simpletons and bums like yourself, and used as an attempt at an insult because you have nothing constructive to say, then I'm afraid you have me mistaken![/quote]

F uck off jock I've carved better men than you out of bananas[/quote]
Haha good come back