Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Cholo_cws
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1905
Joined: 27 Apr 2011, 16:19

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by Cholo_cws »

It's classic mutton dressed as lamb. A British level fight dressed up as a world title fight that tv would be asked to pay a world title fee for - what with all the IBF fees attached to be covered. Maybe it won't be breaking the bank but why should they. The sudden arrival of Ward in the rankings is there for all to see (if they can be bothered.) No, it's not something new in boxing but at the same time people
seem genuinely surprised that terrestrial tv might not be interested in showing boxing. Many can't seem to see beyond blaming Audley for the BBC's disinterest. The shameless politics makes boxing look a joke.
Last edited by Cholo_cws on 29 Jan 2014, 12:48, edited 1 time in total.
Crazyboy
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1246
Joined: 12 Nov 2010, 11:56

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by Crazyboy »

Horse wrote:
Crazyboy wrote:I think you dislike the politics around it mate, the fight itself is a great one i think, stylistically and for the north east fans especially.

I respect peoples opinions but it is what it is and neither Hall or Ward are at fault, i think good luck to them (well especially Stuey as he's a mate :TU: )
If Hall's got anything about him then he should wipe the floor with Ward.

This is a chief support level fight, not a good main event.
I hope he does! :TU:

I respect everyones opinions mate so fair do's, thanks for replying, hopefully Stuey will come through it and start to gain more respect as he defends against different opponents
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by hurlock »

Hagler2002 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:I met Hall on Sunday, top bloke who had plenty time for a chat. Even he admitted he was lucky to get a shot due to boxing politics.

Image
Have you been on a diet, Hagler?
I've lost 7 stone m8 in the last 11 months.
Did you go on a lads holiday to Africa??
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by Hagler2002 »

Hurlock, hard work, dedication m8 :TU:
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by hurlock »

Haha im beginning to hate that phrase!! Sure it's not medication m8 :OhYes:
I preferred you when you was bigger you looked younger & happier
jackukmma
Super Middleweight
Posts: 329
Joined: 10 Feb 2013, 01:32

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by jackukmma »

[quote="JimJim2009"]It is deliberate, targeted, opportunistic ranking of an opponent for the sake of making upcoming domestic match-ups. I don't know if Ward was in the IBF top 15 prior to Hall's world title victory but I would put money on him not being in the previous rankings.

Look at Crolla in at no.6 in the WBO's featherweight rankings. Ricky Burns is the champ. Crolla is nowhere in any other set of world rankings."

I agree wih the sentiment but that's an unfair example. Crolla beat Rees fair and square to take and earn his ranking. That's how you should do it IMO if you best someone in the ranking you go above them. I'm not a fan of people like Ward appearing there conveniently just before a title shot is announced but Crolla earned his ranking
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by Hagler2002 »

hurlock wrote:Haha im beginning to hate that phrase!! Sure it's not medication m8 :OhYes:
I preferred you when you was bigger you looked younger & happier
I was 21 stone fast approaching 40 and the ideal heart attack candidate, I had to do something.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by expe »

This isn't a great world title fight and a few months ago it wouldn't have looked out of place at domestic level, but things change, Hall is now world champion and fighting Ward makes perfect sense. On paper it's a nice easy one for his first defence that will draw the crowds in, the fight might not go as expected, but I would guess this is the first time two fighters from the North East have contested a world title, so it's a huge event up there and will give some local fighters much needed exposure. So, while Ward probably shouldn't be fighting for a world title, I can understand why he is.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23192
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by mickey1975 »

Hagler2002 wrote:
hurlock wrote:Haha im beginning to hate that phrase!! Sure it's not medication m8 :OhYes:
I preferred you when you was bigger you looked younger & happier
I was 21 stone fast approaching 40 and the ideal heart attack candidate, I had to do something.
You didn't look obese to me. Stocky, I would have said.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6441
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by Deserter »

Hagler2002 wrote:
hurlock wrote:Haha im beginning to hate that phrase!! Sure it's not medication m8 :OhYes:
I preferred you when you was bigger you looked younger & happier
I was 21 stone fast approaching 40 and the ideal heart attack candidate, I had to do something.
Fair play to you fella :TU:
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by Autobarn »

will they match up well, produce a good fight?

hall just beat one of the top contenders, in a brutal fight, bear in mind.
Crazyboy
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1246
Joined: 12 Nov 2010, 11:56

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by Crazyboy »

Autobarn wrote:will they match up well, produce a good fight?

hall just beat one of the top contenders, in a brutal fight, bear in mind.
I think the fact its an all NE affair it will bring the best out in them both, the crowd will be great as well
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by earsjohn »

Autobarn wrote:will they match up well, produce a good fight?

hall just beat one of the top contenders, in a brutal fight, bear in mind.
I thought he beat Vusi Malinga?
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by hurlock »

Deserter wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:
hurlock wrote:Haha im beginning to hate that phrase!! Sure it's not medication m8 :OhYes:
I preferred you when you was bigger you looked younger & happier
I was 21 stone fast approaching 40 and the ideal heart attack candidate, I had to do something.
Fair play to you fella :TU:
He's done well!!! Never would of thought he was over 16stone!!
I just want to know how comes he's lost all that timber & his clothes are still to small! :DDD
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by Autobarn »

earsjohn wrote:
Autobarn wrote:will they match up well, produce a good fight?

hall just beat one of the top contenders, in a brutal fight, bear in mind.
I thought he beat Vusi Malinga?
top IBF contenders
bodyactive
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by bodyactive »

Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Explain how this fight is not a match up of styles. I want to know what your logic is.
I don't care about the styles, the fight is a disgrace.
to you maybe but to the north east its a local derby 1st time 2 nrth east boxers have ever competed for a world title so it will be a good crowd.and im sure martin ward will put everything into an opportunity like this.why is it a disgrace??
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by Andrew »

bodyactive wrote:
Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Explain how this fight is not a match up of styles. I want to know what your logic is.
I don't care about the styles, the fight is a disgrace.
to you maybe but to the north east its a local derby 1st time 2 nrth east boxers have ever competed for a world title so it will be a good crowd.and im sure martin ward will put everything into an opportunity like this.why is it a disgrace??
Simple Martin Ward got stopped by Haskins in 5 rounds less than a year ago. Plus Haskins also had a comfortable points win over Hall in July 2012 so he must feel insulted. If this was a British/Commonwealth/European title fight even then it wouldn't be that big of a deal but this is actually a genuine World Title that Hall holds and Martin has not earned the right to fight for it.

April 19th should be the actual IBF Bantam title fight between the two top ranked fighters, one of which is the righful champion of that organisation.

Don't want to critisize Hall for this he admits he was lucky to get a shot and put an awesome performance in to win it. Not a dig at Ward either he won't turn down a chance like this because he probably won't get it again. Its the IBF taking the pi$$ putting Ward in at 15 randomly just like the WBA put Diego Silva in at 15 (when he never fought at the weight) so he could get splattered by 'World Champion' Scott Quigg in an embarrasment of a fight.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by Autobarn »

one thing, perhaps hall will raise his game, having won the title.

a lot of fighters add to their game with the extra responsibility, holding a title, knowing everyone's gunning for you.

hall has momentum on his side, with strong performances in those 2 fights he paid IBF sanctioning fees for.

if a collision with butler's on the cards, why's butler fighting at 115-pounds?
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by tear up »

Anyone going on Saturday just give 150 for a ring side seat but salty if ya as me
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by tear up »

Anyone going on Saturday just give 150 for a ring side seat but salty if ya as me
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by tear up »

Anyone going on Saturday just give 150 for a ring side seat but salty if ya as me
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by JimJim2009 »

Don't want to critisize Hall for this he admits he was lucky to get a shot and put an awesome performance in to win it. Not a dig at Ward either he won't turn down a chance like this because he probably won't get it again. Its the IBF taking the pi$$ putting Ward in at 15 randomly just like the WBA put Diego Silva in at 15 (when he never fought at the weight) so he could get splattered by 'World Champion' Scott Quigg in an embarrasment of a fight.[/quote]

Great points. The problem is, this sport's standards in terms of what constitutes a world championship fight are so low a lot of people don't care about this sort of thing. It's not the fault of the fans. Everyone is so used to it, most people don't stop to think how it could be better. You don't have three reigning English premiership champions, two FA cup winners etc per season.
REEVE
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 777
Joined: 19 Apr 2010, 19:12

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by REEVE »

I'm boxing on this show on Saturday a can't wait! two north east lads fighting for a world title aswell, North Easts a hot bed for boxing at the minute.
Londonirish
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3064
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 13:02

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by Londonirish »

REEVE wrote:I'm boxing on this show on Saturday a can't wait! two north east lads fighting for a world title aswell, North Easts a hot bed for boxing at the minute.


Good luck mate :TU:
REEVE
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 777
Joined: 19 Apr 2010, 19:12

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by REEVE »

Thanks a lot Martin appreciate it :) dream really getting on this show mate.
Post Reply