Page 4 of 4
Re: Golovkin undercard
Posted: 01 Feb 2014, 16:55
by crusader
Murray and Macklin seem to be on the same level to me. I'd put Stevens a bit below, but I think he's a better fighter now than he was at 168.
Re: Golovkin undercard
Posted: 01 Feb 2014, 16:55
by lefty
crusader wrote:Murray and Macklin seem to be on the same level to me. I'd put Stevens below, but I think he's a better fighter now than he was at 168.
I don't know. I think Stevens could knock Macklin out.
Re: Golovkin undercard
Posted: 01 Feb 2014, 16:57
by crusader
columbo wrote:crusader wrote:Murray and Macklin seem to be on the same level to me. I'd put Stevens below, but I think he's a better fighter now than he was at 168.
I don't know. I think Stevens could knock Macklin out.
I wouldn't be shocked if he beat them, but I'd have him the underdog.
Re: Golovkin undercard
Posted: 01 Feb 2014, 16:58
by lefty
crusader wrote:columbo wrote:crusader wrote:Murray and Macklin seem to be on the same level to me. I'd put Stevens below, but I think he's a better fighter now than he was at 168.
I don't know. I think Stevens could knock Macklin out.
I wouldn't be shocked if he beat them, but I'd have him the underdog.
That's a fight that HBO should make actually.
Re: Golovkin undercard
Posted: 01 Feb 2014, 16:58
by crusader
Ya, I agree.
Re: Golovkin undercard
Posted: 01 Feb 2014, 22:51
by ttornado
crusader wrote:Murray and Macklin seem to be on the same level to me. I'd put Stevens a bit below, but I think he's a better fighter now than he was at 168.
I'd put Lee in with the Macklin level, and his boxing skills are a bit superior to anyone you mentioned.