Page 4 of 5

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 17:45
by Finch
Only a matter of time before this ends.

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 17:51
by black panther
Enzo really shouldn't be in there. He can't see at all out of that eye.

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 17:54
by black panther
Terrible corner work in the Enzo corner. Do they not have an endswell?

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 17:55
by palooka
What a brave man, he's still throwing hard; his eye looks horrible.

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 17:57
by ShadrachSimmo
This could be worse than lebedevs injury.

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 17:58
by palooka
ShadrachSimmo wrote:This could be worse than lebedevs injury.
He's done, what a shame the eye went so early.

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 17:58
by onlyme
Braehmer is shite - one two then hold - dogshit - holding has become legal nowadays

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 17:59
by lefty
The fight should of been called off in the first few rounds and it of been ruled a no contest.

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 17:59
by lefty
The fight should of been called off in the first few rounds and it of been ruled a no contest.

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 17:59
by rossij8
Enzo can hold his head up high

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 18:00
by expe
palooka wrote:
ShadrachSimmo wrote:This could be worse than lebedevs injury.
He's done, what a shame the eye went so early.
Feel for Enzo there, gave Braehmer a few problems with one eye and landed some good shots, but he just couldn't see the punches coming.

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 18:00
by palooka
He's good, he's fast and hits hard, he'll be hard to beat and has beaten some really good names am and pro.

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 18:00
by ShadrachSimmo
Makes you wonder why Martin Ward wasn't give the same chance the other week?

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 18:02
by lefty
palooka wrote:He's good, he's fast and hits hard, he'll be hard to beat and has beaten some really good names am and pro.
He wouldnt beat Stevenson and Kovalev. I'm not sure he would of beaten Enzo with two eyes.

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 18:02
by Baboon
Damn shame, he looked decent in there, certainly putting in a decent performance given that he only had one eye and Braehmer was 1-2 then hold all night. Hard luck.

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 18:03
by lefty
Anyone else notice that Enzo's chin held up well tonight aswell? It's a real shame.

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 18:04
by palooka
columbo wrote:
palooka wrote:He's good, he's fast and hits hard, he'll be hard to beat and has beaten some really good names am and pro.
He wouldnt beat Stevenson and Kovalev. I'm not sure he would of beaten Enzo with two eyes.
Though I didn't say that; he is the 3rd (or 4th) best and Enzo didn't have to retire, he was in the fight alright.

(edit: I mean he ought to continue to box, not that he shouldn't have been pulled out tonight.)

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 18:04
by broomy7s
Gutted for Enzo, even his other eye was going. Signs of a long hard career? An injury in training?

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 18:05
by chad
ShadrachSimmo wrote:Makes you wonder why Martin Ward wasn't give the same chance the other week?
different referee

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 18:06
by ShadrachSimmo
columbo wrote:
palooka wrote:He's good, he's fast and hits hard, he'll be hard to beat and has beaten some really good names am and pro.
He wouldnt beat Stevenson and Kovalev. I'm not sure he would of beaten Enzo with two eyes.
Enzo had some success with the eye closed. We'll never know. Doubt they'll be a rematch but Enzo can continue at domestic level if he still wants to fight on.

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 18:08
by TheCobra
Gutted there for Enzo, it looked like it was going to be a really interesting fight and he certainly didn't look out of his depth. The injury was bad though, looks like a break and that will take a long time to heal and potentially a risk in the future now.

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 18:09
by palooka
He didn't look out of his depth did he? :TU:

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 18:12
by lefty
palooka wrote:
columbo wrote:
palooka wrote:He's good, he's fast and hits hard, he'll be hard to beat and has beaten some really good names am and pro.
He wouldnt beat Stevenson and Kovalev. I'm not sure he would of beaten Enzo with two eyes.
Though I didn't say that; he is the 3rd (or 4th) best and Enzo didn't have to retire, he was in the fight alright.

(edit: I mean he ought to continue to box, not that he shouldn't have been pulled out tonight.)
Na I know you didnt say that mate :TU: ... I was just saying myself I dont think he would. He's a good, solid fighter though and definietly one of the best in the division.

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 18:15
by lefty
ShadrachSimmo wrote:
columbo wrote:
palooka wrote:He's good, he's fast and hits hard, he'll be hard to beat and has beaten some really good names am and pro.
He wouldnt beat Stevenson and Kovalev. I'm not sure he would of beaten Enzo with two eyes.
Enzo had some success with the eye closed. We'll never know. Doubt they'll be a rematch but Enzo can continue at domestic level if he still wants to fight on.
Hopefully they can try and make it again. Braehmer is not exactly overly keen when it comes to tough challenges and I cant see him calling out the big dogs of the division.

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 18:15
by TheCobra
On retirement talk: If the eye heals then there's no need to retire, depends how the injury goes really. He certainly looks fitter and stronger these days than a couple of years ago, it'd be a shame to retire on that.