Page 4 of 9

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 16 May 2014, 10:23
by Parson Cross
Here we go DMA another 11 post wonder poster - who knows nothing.
At least he put the ooo in Mexico.

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 16 May 2014, 10:31
by Parson Cross
ooooooo.

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 16 May 2014, 10:37
by Crazyboy
mexicooo wrote:
Parson Cross wrote:Here we go DMA another 11 post wonder poster - who knows nothing.
At least he put the ooo in Mexico.
and you are basing that assumption on what?

if you would like to set your mind at ease, il happily answer any of your questions oh great knowledgable one....but thanks for clicking on my name and realising I have 11 posts, wow u seriously take an interest.

Just so you know though, I have been to both the wild card, Robert Garcia boxing academy and romanza gyms. But your right, Kell Brook after all is renowned for travelling to other fighters back yards, for not pulling out of fights, or shooting off his mouth to A listers, based on his extensive resume, of erm.......il get back to you on that one :)
He's basing it on the fact you said Brook doesn't want to know,

So right back at you mate, what are you basing that assumption on?

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 16 May 2014, 12:58
by Parson Cross
For a so called knowledgeable one

You stated :
"Kell should wait his turn"

HE'S THE FUCKIN MANDATORY YOU PLUM !

"Kell should continue to wait his turn"

HE'S THE FUCKIN MANDATORY YOU PLUM !

Eddie is putting him in with someone current - he's called PORTER.

Like I say clueless.
I've been to loads of gyms all over the world myself and I'm happy to confirm I am useless.

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 16 May 2014, 13:01
by lefty
Parson Cross wrote:For a so called knowledgeable one

You stated :
"Kell should wait his turn"

HE'S THE FUCKIN MANDATORY YOU PLUM !

"Kell should continue to wait his turn"

HE'S THE FUCKIN MANDATORY YOU PLUM !

Eddie is putting him in with someone current - he's called PORTER.

Like I say clueless.
I've been to loads of gyms all over the world myself and I'm happy to confirm I am useless.
Yeah but the more pressing issue is do you love plums?

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 16 May 2014, 13:34
by palooka
I've eaten plums all over the world and I'm clueless.

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 16 May 2014, 15:44
by ALI
Parson Cross wrote:
Eddie is putting him in with someone current - he's called PORTER.
Eddie can do the paper work, getting sick note into the ring on fight night is beyond his control.

Hope it happens, i believe it will. Brook cannot possibly duck out of anymore title challenges - his own mother would end up disowning him.

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 16 May 2014, 15:49
by Parson Cross
Roll on Scottish independence.

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 16 May 2014, 16:00
by ALI
Parson Cross wrote:Roll on Scottish independence.
You better believe it!

Best thing ever to come out of your place was an empty bus - good riddance to you when the time comes :DD

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 16 May 2014, 19:46
by rhino222
gobbles wrote:
rhino222 wrote:
the taylor fight was in the early stages of the super 6, after abraham brutally ko'd taylor also in the super 6 team taylor withdrew their fighter and he was replaced in the competition.

It wasn't in the Super Six. Froch's fights in the Super Six were Dirrell, Kessler, Abraham, Johnson and Ward.
Yes, apologies fellas, done my research now and stand corrected. I think I was going thròugh my divoce with spud at the time, my mind was a mess. :box:

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 16 May 2014, 20:07
by The_Don1
Let's face it Brook was praying for Paulie to win, he would've come to the UK & Brook would've stood a good chance of beating him.

Still Porter shit all over that & Brook has to travel to take a beating as his promoter won't back him to make a big offer let alone take it to purse bids.

Parson Cross will back any fighter from Sheffield, it's a worthless argument to attempt to battle him on this point.

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 17 May 2014, 04:04
by Pugilist-specialist
mexicooo wrote: I have been to both the wild card, Robert Garcia boxing academy and romanza gyms. )
You say "both" and then name more than 2. Did you add an extra one on for good measure?

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 17 May 2014, 04:06
by Pugilist-specialist
mexicooo wrote:now brook isn't that keen on a shot, regardless of what hes saying.....
Has he confided in you?

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 17 May 2014, 04:08
by Pugilist-specialist
mexicooo wrote: Now don't get me wrong he still says he wants it, but hes not exactly begging for it the way he was.
If Porter is mandated to fight him within the next 8 weeks why would he have to beg for it?

Make your mind up. Does he "want it" or not?

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 17 May 2014, 04:14
by Pugilist-specialist
The_Don1 wrote:Let's face it Brook was praying for Paulie to win, he would've come to the UK & Brook would've stood a good chance of beating him.

Still Porter poo all over that & Brook has to travel to take a beating as his promoter won't back him to make a big offer let alone take it to purse bids.
It goes to purse bids in 4 days. Are you saying Hearn will pull Kell out within the next 4 days?

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 17 May 2014, 14:03
by Broomhall
palooka wrote:I've eaten plums all over the world and I'm clueless.
I dont mind plums but I prefer melons given the choice.

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 17 May 2014, 14:31
by BAP1
So many Brook fans on here when will you lot get it he has done nothing on the world scene he has had 32 fights against D level fighters. He deserves the stick because his resume is woeful . We get told by sky sports and Eddie Hearn he is the 'special one' is he really though?

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 17 May 2014, 17:55
by Broomhall
I preferred the talk of plums and melons

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 18 May 2014, 01:16
by palooka
Broomhall wrote:I preferred the talk of plums and melons
My plums are itchy :wave:

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 18 May 2014, 03:57
by palooka
[quote="mexicooo"]Hes the mandtory?... i forgot that in the UK you can beat on 30 odd chumps and creep your way up the rankings.....mandatory...bitch please olusugen was mandatory for about 4 years when that 140lbs title was being passed around, boxing is a business. The differencelb between olusgen and kell is, olusguen actually deserved a shot. In the 147lbs division....who actually cares about kell brook. Man is not even a legit top 15 47lber, which is why he should WAIT HIS TURN, because he has done NOTHING to warrant a fight for any version of a world title. BESIDES....hes getting fucked up by porter in his hometown.....so this pointless discussion about purse bids is irrevelvant. We might as well talk about the purse bids of fonfora vs stevenson while were at it. Parsons -cross.....(you must be pushing 60 with a name like that)......youve travelled to gyms where exactly? dont mention around this country, theres not one world class one amongst it....and if ur still 'useless' as you put it, then you obviously dont pick much up, much like forrest gump in a math class :)]

You're way off about parson cross (it's a lovely suburb in Sheffield), I don't always agree with parson but he deserves more respect; unless you're on the wind up. Parson knows an awful lot of inside stuff (though he is partisan). He's not useless, he doesn't like to big himself up because he doesn't feel the need.

You've a point about the brook situation and we're all likely to find out soon and a few are due some humble pie.

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 18 May 2014, 05:48
by Broomhall
palooka wrote:
Broomhall wrote:I preferred the talk of plums and melons
My plums are itchy :wave:
Its the heat I would suggest.

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 18 May 2014, 05:49
by Pugilist-specialist
mexicooo wrote:Hes the mandtory?... i forgot that in the UK you can beat on 30 odd chumps and creep your way up the rankings.....mandatory...bitch please olusugen was mandatory for about 4 years when that 140lbs title was being passed around, boxing is a business. The differencelb between olusgen and kell is, olusguen actually deserved a shot. In the 147lbs division....who actually cares about kell brook. Man is not even a legit top 15 47lber, which is why he should WAIT HIS TURN, because he has done NOTHING to warrant a fight for any version of a world title. BESIDES....hes getting fucked up by porter in his hometown.....so this pointless discussion about purse bids is irrevelvant. We might as well talk about the purse bids of fonfora vs stevenson while were at it. Parsons -cross.....(you must be pushing 60 with a name like that)......youve travelled to gyms where exactly? dont mention around this country, theres not one world class one amongst it....and if ur still 'useless' as you put it, then you obviously dont pick much up, much like forrest gump in a math class :)
Here's The Ring's welterweight rankings: (I don't think it's a UK magazine)

http://ringtv.craveonline.com/ratings/welterweight

I couldn't manage to find Olusegen on their ratings.

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 18 May 2014, 07:49
by palooka
You're on the wind up as well or else the sun is hotter in Sheffield than anywhere else in the country.

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 18 May 2014, 10:05
by Bennyblanco
I like how brook gets stick for not fighting the best, then stick for trying to fight the best :doh:

Re: Brook vs Porter purse bid deadline

Posted: 18 May 2014, 14:44
by Parson Cross
Mexicoooooooooooo
I'm 57 not a bad guess.
I've worked in and around boxing since 1979. I've been lucky enough to travel the world through my job meet great people and see all aspects of the sport I love.
I'm not going down the quote line because the people I know many of whom visit this place know that's not my style.
Palooka is correct. I am an avid supporter of all of the lads in Sheffield. I don't care about their gym allegiances - I regard all the people in boxing in Sheffield on the same level.
Forget the names forget the allegiances and just stick to facts.
This is the IBF we are talking about.
Following an investigation by the FBI into allegations of back handers to secure rankings etc they are absolutely paranoid about sticking to their rules.
They won't budge - ask McDonnell for example.
The fight contract between Paulie and Shawn had the same clause in it. The fight between them could not take place unless the winner guarenteed to fight Brook within 90 days - which expires on 19/7. You can argue on and on about whether Brook has earned the right and I'll argue all day every day about it.
He's the mandatory.
The 90 day rule applies.
Porter v Brook by 19/7 or Porter will be stripped.
Stop talking to me as though you know the score - you know nothing.