Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:07
116-110 Limond
BoxRec
Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Page 4 of 11
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:09
Hopefully Woodhouse will retire for good now so we don't have to put up with his ignorant, deluded Tweets anymore.
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:10
Holy fuckk at the 113-113 card
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:10
joke of a card by victor loughlin
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:11
so your twitter account gets deleted if you retire.reggaereggae wrote:Hopefully Woodhouse will retire for good now so we don't have to put up with his ignorant, deluded Tweets anymore.
You're funny!
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:12
Good fight and fair play to both boxers.
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:12
Jim Watt calls it a Limond masterclass and Victor Laughran calls it a draw. Jesus, you wonder what planet some people are on.
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:13
Much closer to a masterclass than a draw in my opinion.Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Jim Watt calls it a Limond masterclass and Victor Laughran calls it a draw. Jesus, you wonder what planet some people are on.
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:14
Loughlin clearly can't read a fight.
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:15
Great ref, poor judge?Sklar wrote:Loughlin clearly can't read a fight.
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:15
Alex Arthur is a tube! Why do they always ask him as the Scottish Sky Pundit! Scott Harrison would be much more interesting!
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:16
Well no, he will undoubtedly spout crap; but no longer 'call out' other fighters or boast about how he's going to beatttornado wrote:so your twitter account gets deleted if you retire.reggaereggae wrote:Hopefully Woodhouse will retire for good now so we don't have to put up with his ignorant, deluded Tweets anymore.
You're funny!
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:17
I think they underestimated Limmond..who was very good
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:17
Scott Harrison would turn up pissed, glare with hatred at the other pundits then chin Adam Smith. DEFINITELY would be more entertainingThereByTheGrace wrote:Alex Arthur is a tube! Why do they always ask him as the Scottish Sky Pundit! Scott Harrison would be much more interesting!
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:18
A boxer thinking he can win, terrible stuff.reggaereggae wrote: about how he's going to beat
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:18
I disagree. He's far more articulate and insightful than Harrison could ever be.ThereByTheGrace wrote:Alex Arthur is a tube! Why do they always ask him as the Scottish Sky Pundit! Scott Harrison would be much more interesting!
Unless he was pished
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:18
That's what I think. He's a quality ref but if you a turn a card like that in you're not judging right IMO.gerryd77 wrote:Great ref, poor judge?Sklar wrote:Loughlin clearly can't read a fight.
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:19
Exactly!!reggaereggae wrote:Scott Harrison would turn up pissed, glare with hatred at the other pundits then chin Adam Smith. DEFINITELY would be more entertainingThereByTheGrace wrote:Alex Arthur is a tube! Why do they always ask him as the Scottish Sky Pundit! Scott Harrison would be much more interesting!
"There were crisps everywhere......."
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:19
im not on twitter so don't really know how it works, but cant u just not follow him?reggaereggae wrote:Well no, he will undoubtedly spout crap; but no longer 'call out' other fighters or boast about how he's going to beatttornado wrote:so your twitter account gets deleted if you retire.reggaereggae wrote:Hopefully Woodhouse will retire for good now so we don't have to put up with his ignorant, deluded Tweets anymore.
You're funny!
I don't see the point in following someone when u don't like what he writes.
surely that's like watching a tv show u don't enjoy
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:23
He looks like a determined and focused little elf.
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:26
Not following someone doesn't prevent their rubbish been retwitted to your timeline by someone you follow.stevieb_8006 wrote:im not on twitter so don't really know how it works, but cant u just not follow him?
I don't see the point in following someone when u don't like what he writes.
surely that's like watching a tv show u don't enjoy
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:28
I see. sounds awful. so your forced to read peoples opinions even if you don't like them. horrific.Tarkus wrote:Not following someone doesn't prevent their rubbish been retwitted to your timeline by someone you follow.stevieb_8006 wrote:im not on twitter so don't really know how it works, but cant u just not follow him?
I don't see the point in following someone when u don't like what he writes.
surely that's like watching a tv show u don't enjoy
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:34
flattened
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:34
Burns down in round 1 with a left hook from Dejan - first 30 seconds. Cue boring points victory for Burns,
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 17:37
Only at times, but it can be frustrating.stevieb_8006 wrote:I see. sounds awful. so your forced to read peoples opinions even if you don't like them. horrific.Tarkus wrote:Not following someone doesn't prevent their rubbish been retwitted to your timeline by someone you follow.stevieb_8006 wrote:im not on twitter so don't really know how it works, but cant u just not follow him?
I don't see the point in following someone when u don't like what he writes.
surely that's like watching a tv show u don't enjoy