BoxRec

NateJR wrote:I see the normal assclowns of this forum are crying as always because Floyd is still #1 and been crushing their dreams for the last decade or more. Poor sad people let me tell you, stay mad bitches lol.

GGG hasn't fought anyone as good as Madaina in his entire professional career you phucktards lmao. Get off GGGs dick, he doesn't deserve to hold Floyds jock strap.

Go scream TBE x40 on a street corner somewhere. Pacquiao's win over Timothy Bradley alone eclipses anything in Floyd's career. He doesn't have a single win that meets the 3 following criteria;

1. ATG fighter. 2. In his Prime. 3. In his optimum weight class.

Pacman has a few of those, but at least Floyd avenged Marcos Maidana, have a nice day.

Horse wrote:Martin Murray will deal with Golovkin soon enough.

Christ.

palooka wrote:Who knows what you do with the poor devils?

Make them watch Martin Murray fights until they see what I see.

Ricky_ wrote:

Horse wrote:Martin Murray will deal with Golovkin soon enough.

Christ.

on a bike.

Horse wrote:

palooka wrote:Who knows what you do with the poor devils?

Make them watch Martin Murray fights until they see what I see.

wouldn't it be kinder to just shag em?

palooka wrote:wouldn't it be kinder to just shag em?

I'm not sure.

Yes We Can wrote:

Ricky_ wrote:

Horse wrote:I do not care whether Golovkin has the best ability in the business or not.

Hence why many of these lists are nothing more than cherrypicked résumé dick measuring contests. SRL had a superior résumé than SRR.

Can Golovkin show this abillity against a similar level of fighter that Mayweather and others above him in the list have? that is arguable.

all P4P lists are opinion based, not fact.

Had Golvkin showed a china chin against Geale would he still be your P4P number 1? he'd still have the same skill set after all

no

p4p is both fact and fantasy.

fact is rigondeaux beat donaire! thats why rigondeaux is above donaire in a p4p rank.

fantasy is, i think ggg wrecks canelo, based on the ability i see in him, thats why i rank ggg above canelo, because it think he would beat him in a fight.

Ricky_ wrote:

NateJR wrote:I see the normal assclowns of this forum are crying as always because Floyd is still #1 and been crushing their dreams for the last decade or more. Poor sad people let me tell you, stay mad bitches lol.

GGG hasn't fought anyone as good as Madaina in his entire professional career you phucktards lmao. Get off GGGs dick, he doesn't deserve to hold Floyds jock strap.

Go scream TBE x40 on a street corner somewhere. Pacquiao's win over Timothy Bradley alone eclipses anything in Floyd's career. He doesn't have a single win that meets the 3 following criteria;

1. ATG fighter. 2. In his Prime. 3. In his optimum weight class.

Pacman has a few of those, but at least Floyd avenged Marcos Maidana, have a nice day.

Delusional butthurt assclown you are. I hope you carry around extra large tampons for the heavy flow that pours out of your butt hurt ass.

I just learned 12 new swear words.

Chepppaaa wrote:

no

p4p is both fact and fantasy.

fact is rigondeaux beat donaire! thats why rigondeaux is above donaire in a p4p rank.

fantasy is, i think ggg wrecks canelo, based on the ability i see in him, thats why i rank ggg above canelo, because it think he would beat him in a fight.

You live in a complete fantasy. A over opinionated delusional fantasy world at that. You speak of no facts and when you do it's always special, but most the time you're just a special kind of stupid.

I deem this month's rankings to be a success.

leave it ricky...it is not nessecary to talk to those ......

they dont understand boxing. they think just ebcause you have a better record than someone else means he would win against the other =)

beterbiev and rigondeaux are laughing at you, they beat guys which much better record.

NateJR wrote:

Chepppaaa wrote:

no

p4p is both fact and fantasy.

fact is rigondeaux beat donaire! thats why rigondeaux is above donaire in a p4p rank.

fantasy is, i think ggg wrecks canelo, based on the ability i see in him, thats why i rank ggg above canelo, because it think he would beat him in a fight.

You live in a complete fantasy. A over opinionated delusional fantasy world at that. You speak of no facts and when you do it's always special, but most the time you're just a special kind of stupid.

i can make sense, you cant.

you go by who you like, not by talent or skills. i dont like no boxer, because i dont know them personal, i dont give a f..... about them. i rank by what i see, how good they are. i rank by sill, you rank by "who you like more".....

Chepppaaa wrote:leave it ricky...it is not nessecary to talk to those ......

they dont understand boxing. they think just ebcause you have a better record than someone else means he would win against the other =)

beterbiev and rigondeaux are laughing at you, they beat guys which much better record.

They have better records and have beaten better fighters. Is this opposite day? I was sure Cheppa and Ricky were the dumbest Mofos on this forum. I'm betting the majority would agree whole heartily. So GGG can beat a blown up WW in Floyd and a JMW in Canelo in your opinion so he deserves to be ranked above these guys even though both of them haven proven and beaten much better opposition? Carry on dumbass.

Chepppaaa wrote:

NateJR wrote:

Chepppaaa wrote:

no

p4p is both fact and fantasy.

fact is rigondeaux beat donaire! thats why rigondeaux is above donaire in a p4p rank.

fantasy is, i think ggg wrecks canelo, based on the ability i see in him, thats why i rank ggg above canelo, because it think he would beat him in a fight.

You live in a complete fantasy. A over opinionated delusional fantasy world at that. You speak of no facts and when you do it's always special, but most the time you're just a special kind of stupid.

i can make sense, you cant.

you go by who you like, not by talent or skills. i dont like no boxer, because i dont know them personal, i dont give a f..... about them. i rank by what i see, how good they are. i rank by sill, you rank by "who you like more".....

Yep you and your 2 friends on this forum agree with you and the rest of the world knows nothing. Great argument.

I'm with everyone else on the Andre Ward topic
Why is JMM so high? beating Alverado doesn't merit a top 4 place after the Bradley defeat
Roman Gonzalez at 5? he's only fought in 1 world title fight in his last 6 yet he leapfrogs a technical genius like Rigondeaux

Horse wrote:1. (1.) Floyd Mayweather Jr.
2. (2.) Andre Ward
3. (3.) Manny Pacquiao
4. (4.) Juan Manuel Marquez
5. (15.) Roman Gonzalez
6. (5.) Guillermo Rigondeaux
7. (7.) Carl Froch
8. (6.) Timothy Bradley
9. (8.) Bernard Hopkins
10. (9.) Saul Alvarez

11. (16.) Juan Francisco Estrada
12. (10.) Wladimir Klitschko
13. (11.) Gennady Golovkin
14. (12.) Adonis Stevenson
15. (13.) Mikey Garcia
16. (14.) Nonito Donaire
17. (17.) Miguel Cotto
18. (18.) Shinsuke Yamanaka
19. (19.) Sergey Kovalev
20. (21.) Terence Crawford

21. (20.) Danny Garcia
22. (23.) Leo Santa Cruz
23. (24.) Mauricio Herrera
24. (26.) Erislandy Lara
25. (27.) Kell Brook
26. (NE.) Carl Frampton
27. (22.) Marcos Maidana
28. (25.) Akira Yaegashi
29. (30.) Marco Huck
30. (28.) Jhonny Gonzalez

Out - (29.) Takashi Uchiyama

Horse wrote:I deem this month's rankings to be a success.

You only make these lists to cause argument and bad feeling.

you go by who you like, not by talent or skills. i dont like no boxer, because i dont know them personal, i dont give a f..... about them. i rank by what i see, how good they are. i rank by sill, you rank by "who you like more".....[/quote]

Yep you and your 2 friends on this forum agree with you and the rest of the world knows nothing. Great argument.[/quote]
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

so this is your arguemant, when somebody is in the minority than he is obviously wrong.

you couldnt be more wrong. sometimes the minority these the truth and the mayority is blind. one reaon because so many wars went on in the past, because mayoritys thought it would be great to attack and the minority didnt want none of it. but sure, minority were wrong =) as always.

this is a forum with a mayjority of boxing stupid. i am in a minority of boxing experts.

palooka wrote:You only make these lists to cause argument and bad feeling.

I create debate and nurture understanding.

Horse wrote:

palooka wrote:You only make these lists to cause argument and bad feeling.

I create debate and nurture understanding.

you are super stupid and can make no arguemant. youngster.

everytime you are in a conversation with somebody, you are only able to bring up record, like an record is the only thing that matters in boxing.

explain me why donaire lost to rigondeaux. didnt he had a much better record than rigo, how come he totaly got owned?? you are not able to answer, because your a dumbass. you will switch and ry to start a conversatin about soemthing else and hide away.

Horse wrote:

palooka wrote:You only make these lists to cause argument and bad feeling.

I create debate and nurture understanding.

Oh you do that alright

davie wrote:I'm with everyone else on the Andre Ward topic

There is no consensus on that issue.

davie wrote:Why is JMM so high? beating Alverado doesn't merit a top 4 place after the Bradley defeat

He lost narrowly to Bradley and he knocked Pacquiao out not too long ago.

davie wrote:Roman Gonzalez at 5? he's only fought in 1 world title fight in his last 6

So?

davie wrote:yet he leapfrogs a technical genius like Rigondeaux

Rigo's record is not very strong, his win against Donaire was 18 months ago. He will start to drop soon if he doesn't fight someone good again.

Chepppaaa wrote:you are super stupid and can make no arguemant. youngster.

everytime you are in a conversation with somebody, you are only able to bring up record, like an record is the only thing that matters in boxing.

explain me why donaire lost to rigondeaux. didnt he had a much better record than rigo, how come he totaly got owned?? you are not able to answer, because your a dumbass. you will switch and ry to start a conversatin about soemthing else and hide away.

You are a silly poster.

Rigondeaux will be exposed soon. Santa Cruz and Frampton would both beat him.

fergusg wrote:I personally like Horse’s pound-for-pound list.

Whilst I don’t agree with his rating of Andre Ward, that doesn’t necessarily detract very much from the overall quality of his rankings.

One minor gripe is trivial in the big scheme of things.

Horse wrote:

Chepppaaa wrote:you are super stupid and can make no arguemant. youngster.

everytime you are in a conversation with somebody, you are only able to bring up record, like an record is the only thing that matters in boxing.

explain me why donaire lost to rigondeaux. didnt he had a much better record than rigo, how come he totaly got owned?? you are not able to answer, because your a dumbass. you will switch and ry to start a conversatin about soemthing else and hide away.

You are a silly poster.

Rigondeaux will be exposed soon. Santa Cruz and Frampton would both beat him.

hahhahahhahahhahahaha.....you so stupid hahaha....

like i said....you making it very easy looking stupid and having me right. cause i said you wouldnt be able to answer a question and that you would switch to another subject.

and than you put smileys on everybodys posts who said something positiv about your ranking like a litle b.., dude, are you 15 or what.....