Re: Andre Ward vs. Rohan Murdock
Posted: 21 Oct 2015, 00:21
I just looked up Andre Wards record on BoxRec. No mention of Ward fighting this guy. Whoever he is...
Multiple sources. Looking very likely, but perhaps it's not finalized yet.MachoTime wrote:I just looked up Andre Wards record on BoxRec. No mention of Ward fighting this guy. Whoever he is...
If he fights all them and beats them...hands down you have to give him credit.davie wrote:Someone said to me in another thread just days ago
"What if Ward fights GGG, Kovalev, Stevenson and Beterbiev?"
![]()
Well my friend, I'd credit him as one of the bravest in the history of the game and if he won them all he'd be p4p no1 without question.
But as it stands he's a effing laughing stock with less integrity than Amir Khan
He'll embarrass himself if he takes this fight.Evander wrote:Hard not to join in with all the scathing criticism this potential opponent for Andre Ward is getting, I can't actually believe it to be honest is this for real or what ?
What on earth is Ward thinking.

Ward is nowhere nearly as good as Leonard.littlepug wrote:to think leonard took out 3yrs then fought hagler ! Ward is gonna start regressing quickly if he dosent up the standard of opposition.
leonard was at tail end of his career, ward is in his prime and supposed to be elite level, if he had anything about him he would of fought kovalov in his first fight back.Freedom2013 wrote:Ward is nowhere nearly as good as Leonard.littlepug wrote:to think leonard took out 3yrs then fought hagler ! Ward is gonna start regressing quickly if he dosent up the standard of opposition.
littlepug wrote:leonard was at tail end of his career, ward is in his prime and supposed to be elite level, if he had anything about him he would of fought kovalov in his first fight back.Freedom2013 wrote:Ward is nowhere nearly as good as Leonard.littlepug wrote:to think leonard took out 3yrs then fought hagler ! Ward is gonna start regressing quickly if he dosent up the standard of opposition.
Dont worry about it Diddy.diddy wrote:GGG has more attractive options at 168 than Ward?
Ha, that's a good one. This board is great. You guys really hate America. It's cute.
Hello Mr Pug,littlepug wrote:leonard was at tail end of his career, ward is in his prime and supposed to be elite level, if he had anything about him he would of fought kovalov in his first fight back.Freedom2013 wrote:Ward is nowhere nearly as good as Leonard.littlepug wrote:to think leonard took out 3yrs then fought hagler ! Ward is gonna start regressing quickly if he dosent up the standard of opposition.
That's gotta be embarrassing for someone of Ward's caliber to basically be told "Come on man, really?". I wonder who the next stiff on the potential opponent list is?Taansend wrote:Ward Murdock is OFF!!! Nevada Commission said NO!!!
Bad news for the Aussie lad but fair play to the commission for trying to set some standards
To be honest I doubt he knows or cares too much about this kind of opponent. Virg has him training for Kova right now. They know he has too much for these lads. It's just in the ring work.punchoutsb wrote:That's gotta be embarrassing for someone of Ward's caliber to basically be told "Come on man, really?". I wonder who the next stiff on the potential opponent list is?Taansend wrote:Ward Murdock is OFF!!! Nevada Commission said NO!!!
Bad news for the Aussie lad but fair play to the commission for trying to set some standards
I did some searching and it looks like you are right about this.Taansend wrote:Ward Murdock is OFF!!! Nevada Commission said NO!!!
Bad news for the Aussie lad but fair play to the commission for trying to set some standards
I got it from someone connected to Murdock. They weren't too happy.Freedom2013 wrote:I did some searching and it looks like you are right about this.Taansend wrote:Ward Murdock is OFF!!! Nevada Commission said NO!!!
Bad news for the Aussie lad but fair play to the commission for trying to set some standards
https://twitter.com/ben_damon/status/657092059195531264
Props to the commission if they have prevented this ugly mismatch.
Got to feel sorry for the lad he was in a win-win situation as even in a loss his stock would have risen if he had given all he had, but fair play to the commission this time but I hope they keep there standards up.Taansend wrote:I got it from someone connected to Murdock. They weren't too happy.Freedom2013 wrote:I did some searching and it looks like you are right about this.Taansend wrote:Ward Murdock is OFF!!! Nevada Commission said NO!!!
Bad news for the Aussie lad but fair play to the commission for trying to set some standards
https://twitter.com/ben_damon/status/657092059195531264
Props to the commission if they have prevented this ugly mismatch.
Is that an commonly used American abbreviation for Dumbfuckpostkidbazooka1 wrote:Dpost
davie wrote:Is that an commonly used American abbreviation for Dumbfuckpostkidbazooka1 wrote:Dpost