BoxRec

palooka wrote: BoxRec was packed out with posters and punters backing Collazo to knock Khan clean out, people were wisw after the event.

Devon Alexander is better than every opponent Brook has boxed.

I thought you was better than this Palooka. Alexander had just lost to Porter but he's still a better win then Porter? How? Just look at both of there last 2 fights... I see your hatred of Kell is clouding your judgement like everyone else's, I know you will say you don't hate him and you think he's an ok fighter but kc says the same about GGG...

Caldo show me the outrageous quotes from Brook or STFU.

johnswan1 wrote:

palooka wrote:

SFW wrote:At least Kahn has shown the balls to fight the best, he dared to take much more risk than Kell has. That's just a simple fact.

I agree, Khan has his faults as a person and as a boxer but he has shown he will put himself out of his comfort zone and will box very good opposition - Kell has yet to show this and it is a surprise that Khan is younger than Brook - Khan has boxed at a high level for years and years.

Khan hasn't taken a risky fight since he got knocked out by Garcia at Light Welter. He's only fought light punching boxers since then. Porter is more dangerous than any guy Khan has faced at 147.

Maybe at 147. Kahn undoubtedly has fought much more dangerous guys consistently than Brook has over his career... you guys are putting faaaaar too much on a debatable Porter win, the guy is limited and predictable almost seems allergic to throwing straight shots wings everything mugs everyone. That as the basis for making an argument against Kahn's career and willingness to fight top guys is a joke.

johnswan1 wrote:

palooka wrote: Devon Alexander is better than every opponent Brook has boxed.

Better than Porter?

There's not a great deal in it, as you well know John - styles make fights. There is no doubt at all in my mind that Khan has faced the better opposition and he has done more than Brook to put himself out there for a big fight. Who has Brook boxed in Vegas? The only way to be a big star and earn big money is by being in exciting fights against recognised names - generally away from home - it show desire and confidence.

digzee wrote:

palooka wrote: BoxRec was packed out with posters and punters backing Collazo to knock Khan clean out, people were wisw after the event.

Devon Alexander is better than every opponent Brook has boxed.

I thought you was better than this Palooka. Alexander had just lost to Porter but he's still a better win then Porter? How? Just look at both of there last 2 fights... I see your hatred of Kell is clouding your judgement like everyone else's, I know you will say you don't hate him and you think he's an ok fighter but kc says the same about GGG...

Caldo show me the outrageous quotes from Brook or STFU.

digzee, Brook is a very good fighter who is big and powerful at the weight (when he can make it). Brook has beaten Porter in over 10 years as a pro and it wasn't a clear cut victory, it was pretty nip and tuck. Collazo wrecked Ortiz and many were saying Khan would not box him or that if he did he'd be chinned, when Khan beat him sideways it was because Collazo was a bum. There's nothingthat Brook has done to hate him, he seems sound but as a world champ he has to face very good fighters beat them in style and then be offered a big fight on the back of his performances, he can't bash the British champion and demand a multi million stadium fight. Algieri would give most a hard scrap though he can't punch hard.

Sammy Vasquez, Erol SPence and Thurman absolutely smoke Bradley and/or Brook.


I like Bradley but that cocky smirk/shoulder shrug after the fight was disrespectful and very dumb. I don't have no time for dumbness

Kell looks like he's the real deal but doesn't back up his record quite like Tim does.
I'd be open to a bit of that if I were Tim Bradley.