Who is it?

Stevieb8006 · Post by **Stevieb8006** » 22 May 2016, 12:08

If it was an active boxer I'd have suggested kell

Counter-puncher · Post by **Counter-puncher** » 22 May 2016, 12:09

rpms wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
tobyh5 wrote:Rachel has replied to my tweet with a crying with laughter icon so I will take that as a firm "no"
You're never tweeting Frochs' Mrs? You'll end up getting cobra'd
As long as he stays away from Wembley when its near to capacity he'll be fine

Ah, froch and Wembley.

Cyclops · Post by **Cyclops** » 22 May 2016, 12:14

reggaereggae wrote:
These are my suspects in terms of likelihood:

1. Hatton
2. Froch
3. Calzaghe

Outsiders - Barry McGuigan, Steve Collins, Naseem Hamed, Glenn
Real outsiders - Benn, Eubank, Johnny Nelson, Anthony Farnell, Paul Hodkinson, Enzo Mac, Paul Ingle

It's never Frog or Zags in a million years. They have standards, those boys.

reggaereggae · Post by **reggaereggae** » 22 May 2016, 12:26

clopixolacuphase wrote:
reggaereggae wrote:
These are my suspects in terms of likelihood:

1. Hatton
2. Froch
3. Calzaghe

Outsiders - Barry McGuigan, Steve Collins, Naseem Hamed, Glenn
Real outsiders - Benn, Eubank, Johnny Nelson, Anthony Farnell, Paul Hodkinson, Enzo Mac, Paul Ingle
It's never Frog or Zags in a million years. They have standards, those boys.

No one has standards when they're completely pissed ad either sniffing or wanting to sniff the Devils talcuum powder!

keithmoonhangover · Post by **keithmoonhangover** » 22 May 2016, 12:29

CharlesListon wrote:I'm watching yesterday's sky coverage of Joseph Parkers fight with Takam.

Big Glen seems too relaxed for someone who may get exposed in the press for liking coke on his willy.

He's better off with Paprika on his Johnson. It's very stimulating for the lass. Not that I've ever done that sort of thing.

handsofstone · Post by **handsofstone** » 22 May 2016, 12:36

Is it sad that i got all giddy when i logged on here today to see 4 pages on this topic

.......

bripez · Post by **bripez** » 22 May 2016, 12:38

Stevieb8006 wrote:If it was an active boxer I'd have suggested kell

I hope for his sake it wasn't him - can you just imagine how his misses would react this time?

reggaereggae · Post by **reggaereggae** » 22 May 2016, 12:41

bripez wrote:
Stevieb8006 wrote:If it was an active boxer I'd have suggested kell
I hope for his sake it wasn't him - can you just imagine how his misses would react this time?

I'm sure his missus is as worried about 'Special K' doing Ketamine and going to gay clubs...

Counter-puncher · Post by **Counter-puncher** » 22 May 2016, 12:49

That was never in a million years a chance meeting. This is exactly the kind of bird that dude who edits 'Hush Hush' in LA Confidential would use for a risqué expose/ put-up job.

CharlesListon · Post by **CharlesListon** » 22 May 2016, 12:53

I just said on another thread ( the poll) ...I hope it's not Bruno.

Watt would be funny.

Stevieb8006 · Post by **Stevieb8006** » 22 May 2016, 12:54

The thing I can't fathom is why a looker like Hatton would need to visit a prozzy

reggaereggae · Post by **reggaereggae** » 22 May 2016, 12:55

CharlesListon wrote:I just said on another thread ( the poll) ...I hope it's not Bruno.

Watt would be funny.

Not as funny as Barry McGuigan!

CharlesListon · Post by **CharlesListon** » 22 May 2016, 13:03

Jim Watt's whorecard! !!!

tobyh5 · Post by **tobyh5** » 22 May 2016, 13:30

I would caution people to be careful with wording. Remember how McAlpine sued 10,000 twitter users over falsely saying he was involved in something, paedophilia I think

lefty · Post by **lefty** » 22 May 2016, 13:44

Stevieb8006 wrote:If it was an active boxer I'd have suggested kell

If it was a male escort (I kid, I kid)

lefty · Post by **lefty** » 22 May 2016, 13:45

CharlesListon wrote:I just said on another thread ( the poll) ...I hope it's not Bruno.

Watt would be funny.

fornicating Watt

lefty · Post by **lefty** » 22 May 2016, 13:46

tobyh5 wrote:I would caution people to be careful with wording. Remember how McAlpine sued 10,000 twitter users over falsely saying he was involved in something, paedophilia I think

I'm pretty sure he retracted it in the end or the sums people had to pay were pretty small.

lefty · Post by **lefty** » 22 May 2016, 13:51

Jokes aside though, i'm surprised this thread hasn't been locked by the mods. You cant type Fra*k Warr*n without it being changed to allegedly but here we all are speculating on who has done this deed.

littlepug · Post by **littlepug** » 22 May 2016, 13:53

lefty wrote:
CharlesListon wrote:I just said on another thread ( the poll) ...I hope it's not Bruno.

Watt would be funny.
effing Watt

God I hope not, been through a lot lately losing his daughter tragically

lefty · Post by **lefty** » 22 May 2016, 13:55

littlepug wrote:
lefty wrote:
CharlesListon wrote:I just said on another thread ( the poll) ...I hope it's not Bruno.

Watt would be funny.
effing Watt
God I hope not, been through a lot lately losing his daughter tragically

Yeah actually that's very true. I'd forgotten about that. Aside from his age though, I can never in a million years see Watt being involved in that anyway.

Terminator666 · Post by **Terminator666** » 22 May 2016, 14:06

Could always ask if it's him on Twitter

handsofstone · Post by **handsofstone** » 22 May 2016, 14:10

Is there any mention of McGuigan's "discombobulated" cum face?

CharlesListon · Post by **CharlesListon** » 22 May 2016, 14:30

Was Sir McAlpine a former world champion?

Let's hope he isn't on here or I'm fucked. I've got almost £8 of my overdraft left.

lefty · Post by **lefty** » 22 May 2016, 16:08

CharlesListon wrote:Was Sir McAlpine a former world champion?

Let's hope he isn't on here or I'm fucked. I've got almost £8 of my overdraft left.

milpool · Post by **milpool** » 23 May 2016, 04:30

CharlesListon wrote:Jim Watt's whorecard! !!!

Bang on the menge...!

Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?

Re: Who is it?