Page 4 of 7

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 12:08
by Stevieb8006
If it was an active boxer I'd have suggested kell

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 12:09
by Counter-puncher
rpms wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
tobyh5 wrote:Rachel has replied to my tweet with a crying with laughter icon so I will take that as a firm "no"
You're never tweeting Frochs' Mrs? :oo You'll end up getting cobra'd
As long as he stays away from Wembley when its near to capacity he'll be fine
:lol: Ah, froch and Wembley.

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 12:14
by Cyclops
reggaereggae wrote:
These are my suspects in terms of likelihood:

1. Hatton
2. Froch
3. Calzaghe

Outsiders - Barry McGuigan, Steve Collins, Naseem Hamed, Glenn
Real outsiders - Benn, Eubank, Johnny Nelson, Anthony Farnell, Paul Hodkinson, Enzo Mac, Paul Ingle
It's never Frog or Zags in a million years. They have standards, those boys.

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 12:26
by reggaereggae
clopixolacuphase wrote:
reggaereggae wrote:
These are my suspects in terms of likelihood:

1. Hatton
2. Froch
3. Calzaghe

Outsiders - Barry McGuigan, Steve Collins, Naseem Hamed, Glenn
Real outsiders - Benn, Eubank, Johnny Nelson, Anthony Farnell, Paul Hodkinson, Enzo Mac, Paul Ingle
It's never Frog or Zags in a million years. They have standards, those boys.
No one has standards when they're completely pissed ad either sniffing or wanting to sniff the Devils talcuum powder! :lol: :lol:

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 12:29
by keithmoonhangover
CharlesListon wrote:I'm watching yesterday's sky coverage of Joseph Parkers fight with Takam.

Big Glen seems too relaxed for someone who may get exposed in the press for liking coke on his willy.
He's better off with Paprika on his Johnson. It's very stimulating for the lass. Not that I've ever done that sort of thing. :confused:

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 12:36
by handsofstone
Is it sad that i got all giddy when i logged on here today to see 4 pages on this topic :yay: ....... :oops:

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 12:38
by bripez
Stevieb8006 wrote:If it was an active boxer I'd have suggested kell
I hope for his sake it wasn't him - can you just imagine how his misses would react this time?

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 12:41
by reggaereggae
bripez wrote:
Stevieb8006 wrote:If it was an active boxer I'd have suggested kell
I hope for his sake it wasn't him - can you just imagine how his misses would react this time?
I'm sure his missus is as worried about 'Special K' doing Ketamine and going to gay clubs...

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 12:49
by Counter-puncher
That was never in a million years a chance meeting. This is exactly the kind of bird that dude who edits 'Hush Hush' in LA Confidential would use for a risqué expose/ put-up job.

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 12:53
by CharlesListon
I just said on another thread ( the poll) ...I hope it's not Bruno.

Watt would be funny.

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 12:54
by Stevieb8006
The thing I can't fathom is why a looker like Hatton would need to visit a prozzy

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 12:55
by reggaereggae
CharlesListon wrote:I just said on another thread ( the poll) ...I hope it's not Bruno.

Watt would be funny.
Not as funny as Barry McGuigan!

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 13:03
by CharlesListon
Jim Watt's whorecard! !!!

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 13:30
by tobyh5
I would caution people to be careful with wording. Remember how McAlpine sued 10,000 twitter users over falsely saying he was involved in something, paedophilia I think

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 13:44
by lefty
Stevieb8006 wrote:If it was an active boxer I'd have suggested kell
If it was a male escort (I kid, I kid)

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 13:45
by lefty
CharlesListon wrote:I just said on another thread ( the poll) ...I hope it's not Bruno.

Watt would be funny.
fornicating Watt :lol:

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 13:46
by lefty
tobyh5 wrote:I would caution people to be careful with wording. Remember how McAlpine sued 10,000 twitter users over falsely saying he was involved in something, paedophilia I think
I'm pretty sure he retracted it in the end or the sums people had to pay were pretty small.

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 13:51
by lefty
Jokes aside though, i'm surprised this thread hasn't been locked by the mods. You cant type Fra*k Warr*n without it being changed to allegedly but here we all are speculating on who has done this deed.

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 13:53
by littlepug
lefty wrote:
CharlesListon wrote:I just said on another thread ( the poll) ...I hope it's not Bruno.

Watt would be funny.
effing Watt :lol:
God I hope not, been through a lot lately losing his daughter tragically

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 13:55
by lefty
littlepug wrote:
lefty wrote:
CharlesListon wrote:I just said on another thread ( the poll) ...I hope it's not Bruno.

Watt would be funny.
effing Watt :lol:
God I hope not, been through a lot lately losing his daughter tragically
Yeah actually that's very true. I'd forgotten about that. Aside from his age though, I can never in a million years see Watt being involved in that anyway.

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 14:06
by Terminator666
Could always ask if it's him on Twitter :D

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 14:10
by handsofstone
Is there any mention of McGuigan's "discombobulated" cum face?

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 14:30
by CharlesListon
Was Sir McAlpine a former world champion?

Let's hope he isn't on here or I'm fucked. I've got almost £8 of my overdraft left.

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 22 May 2016, 16:08
by lefty
CharlesListon wrote:Was Sir McAlpine a former world champion?

Let's hope he isn't on here or I'm fucked. I've got almost £8 of my overdraft left.
:lol:

Re: Who is it?

Posted: 23 May 2016, 04:30
by milpool
CharlesListon wrote:Jim Watt's whorecard! !!!
Bang on the menge...!