115-112 116-111X2 all three for Lara. Tanzio had it a DRAW!!! LOL he just does not know how to score a fight and I have been saying that for how long??? Now he just proves his scorecards are bogus once again.Tanzio wrote:Go fvck yourself coward.Lancenix wrote:Now everyone is seeing what I have said for a while. You DO NOT KNOW how to score a fight.Tanzio wrote:Rd11= they take a point from Marti! Lara combo on the resume. Nice left Marti. Marti knows he needs to come on. People saying this is boring r full of sh!t
106-105 lara
Lara v Marti card
Re: Lara v Marti card
Re: Lara v Marti card
Excellent fight. Too wide for me. No problem with Lara getting the win though.
Re: Lara v Marti card
A DRAW for Tanzio!! LOL The scorecard nightmare and the WORST RBR in the business.Tanzio wrote:Rd 12= marti pounds away. Lara picking away. Marti going after him. Lara comes back. 115-115 draw for me.
Re: Lara v Marti card
lol at the people who think GGG is ducking Lara
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17400
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Lara v Marti card
American Dream my ass. Send the bore back to Cuba.
Re: Lara v Marti card
Your nutz are so microscopic that you don't score at all you b!tch. Your criticism is based on official scoring. Gfy coward.Lancenix wrote:115-112 116-111X2 all three for Lara. Tanzio had it a DRAW!!! LOL he just does not know how to score a fight and I have been saying that for how long??? Now he just proves his scorecards are bogus once again.Tanzio wrote:Go fvck yourself coward.Lancenix wrote:
Now everyone is seeing what I have said for a while. You DO NOT KNOW how to score a fight.![]()
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Lara v Marti card
Vanes looked better against Lara than Canelo did. His problem was that he didn't have Canelo's judges.
Re: Lara v Marti card
I had it 115-112 Lara, although it should've been 115-113 because the deduction was bogus.
Re: Lara v Marti card
Actually i scored the other fights you screwed up. I couldn't score today and save all of your errors like I have been. You are a poor scorer and you try to make the fights closer than they are. You have proven it once again.Tanzio wrote:Your nutz are so microscopic that you don't score at all you b!tch. Your criticism is based on official scoring. Gfy coward.Lancenix wrote:115-112 116-111X2 all three for Lara. Tanzio had it a DRAW!!! LOL he just does not know how to score a fight and I have been saying that for how long??? Now he just proves his scorecards are bogus once again.Tanzio wrote: Go fvck yourself coward.![]()
Re: Lara v Marti card
I said your card was off during the fight actually. Anyone can see that. You need to take a novice boxing judging class or something. IDKTanzio wrote:Your nutz are so microscopic that you don't score at all you b!tch. Your criticism is based on official scoring. Gfy coward.Lancenix wrote:115-112 116-111X2 all three for Lara. Tanzio had it a DRAW!!! LOL he just does not know how to score a fight and I have been saying that for how long??? Now he just proves his scorecards are bogus once again.Tanzio wrote: Go fvck yourself coward.![]()
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17400
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Lara v Marti card
Fighters like Rigondull and Lara are a cancer on the sport. The sooner they are out of the game the better for it's overall well being. Fighters who do the very least possible need to be punished for their negative boxing with low paydays and no tv contracts.
Re: Lara v Marti card
I had it 115-113, but that's because I had the first round even 10-10.crusader wrote:I had it 115-112 Lara, although it should've been 115-113 because the deduction was bogus.
Re: Lara v Marti card
No he didn't.boxing_rocks wrote:Vanes looked better against Lara than Canelo did. His problem was that he didn't have Canelo's judges.
Re: Lara v Marti card
I had Trout vs Jermall Charlo a draw personally. 114-114Tanzio wrote:116-112 charlo for me
-
Impractical Poster
- Middleweight
- Posts: 7636
- Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28
Re: Lara v Marti card
I figured Lara would call out GGG in the post fight interview. Guess not. He would rather call out Canelo.
Close fight. After watching this, I agree with with Gilgamesh. G would have little problem with this guy. However, if the fight ever takes place, G will get no credit for demolishing a LMW, and instead get crap for not moving up.
But think about it, if he really wanted G, why didn't he call him out instead of Canelo tonight? He does not want that fight. So give it a rest.
Close fight. After watching this, I agree with with Gilgamesh. G would have little problem with this guy. However, if the fight ever takes place, G will get no credit for demolishing a LMW, and instead get crap for not moving up.
But think about it, if he really wanted G, why didn't he call him out instead of Canelo tonight? He does not want that fight. So give it a rest.
Re: Lara v Marti card
"Actually" you are a pudendum and a coward. You might notice that I never criticize others' scores whether they match the official scoring or not.Lancenix wrote:Actually i scored the other fights you screwed up. I couldn't score today and save all of your errors like I have been. You are a poor scorer and you try to make the fights closer than they are. You have proven it once again.Tanzio wrote:Your nutz are so microscopic that you don't score at all you b!tch. Your criticism is based on official scoring. Gfy coward.Lancenix wrote:
115-112 116-111X2 all three for Lara. Tanzio had it a DRAW!!! LOL he just does not know how to score a fight and I have been saying that for how long??? Now he just proves his scorecards are bogus once again.![]()
Marti fought well. I'd have given him the decision by a point if not for the penalty. A pudendum like you ridiculing my scores is a compliment. Gilgamesh pointing out that we scored the last two fights oppositely is what decent forum conversation is about. He had Charlo v Trout a draw. I had it 116-112 Charlo ( like the official judges ). That does not mean that I would accuse him of not knowing how to score.
Every visit you confirm your cvntishness.
Re: Lara v Marti card
Lara clearly won. Sorry you do not know how to score. Maybe you will improve. But I doubt it. How could you criticize other people scoring a fight when you don't know how to score a fight yourself??Tanzio wrote:"Actually" you are a pudendum and a coward. You might notice that I never criticize others' scores whether they match the official scoring or not.Lancenix wrote:Actually i scored the other fights you screwed up. I couldn't score today and save all of your errors like I have been. You are a poor scorer and you try to make the fights closer than they are. You have proven it once again.Tanzio wrote: Your nutz are so microscopic that you don't score at all you b!tch. Your criticism is based on official scoring. Gfy coward.
Marti fought well. I'd have given him the decision by a point if not for the penalty. A pudendum like you ridiculing my scores is a compliment. Gilgamesh pointing out that we scored the last two fights oppositely is what decent forum conversation is about. He had Charlo v Trout a draw. I had it 116-112 Charlo ( like the official judges ). That does not mean that I would accuse him of not knowing how to score.
Every visit you confirm your cvntishness.
Re: Lara v Marti card
I think that Charlo did what GingerHead did in the championship rounds; cruise in the confidence of having a lead. GingerHead had open scoring to confirm it though.gilgamesh wrote:I had Trout vs Jermall Charlo a draw personally. 114-114Tanzio wrote:116-112 charlo for me
Re: Lara v Marti card
There were at least 5 rounds in that Charlo vs Trout fight that could've went either way. That was a hard one to score. Hell almost every round on that card was kinda hard to score. Competitive matchups. Maybe not the most exciting in the world, but certainly competitive.Tanzio wrote:"Actually" you are a pudendum and a coward. You might notice that I never criticize others' scores whether they match the official scoring or not.Lancenix wrote:Actually i scored the other fights you screwed up. I couldn't score today and save all of your errors like I have been. You are a poor scorer and you try to make the fights closer than they are. You have proven it once again.Tanzio wrote: Your nutz are so microscopic that you don't score at all you b!tch. Your criticism is based on official scoring. Gfy coward.
Marti fought well. I'd have given him the decision by a point if not for the penalty. A pudendum like you ridiculing my scores is a compliment. Gilgamesh pointing out that we scored the last two fights oppositely is what decent forum conversation is about. He had Charlo v Trout a draw. I had it 116-112 Charlo ( like the official judges ). That does not mean that I would accuse him of not knowing how to score.
Every visit you confirm your cvntishness.
Re: Lara v Marti card
He won officially. You think that it was clearly. I saw a draw.Lancenix wrote:Lara clearly won. Sorry you do not know how to score. Maybe you will improve. But I doubt it. How could you criticize other people scoring a fight when you don't know how to score a fight yourself??Tanzio wrote:"Actually" you are a pudendum and a coward. You might notice that I never criticize others' scores whether they match the official scoring or not.Lancenix wrote:
Actually i scored the other fights you screwed up. I couldn't score today and save all of your errors like I have been. You are a poor scorer and you try to make the fights closer than they are. You have proven it once again.
Marti fought well. I'd have given him the decision by a point if not for the penalty. A pudendum like you ridiculing my scores is a compliment. Gilgamesh pointing out that we scored the last two fights oppositely is what decent forum conversation is about. He had Charlo v Trout a draw. I had it 116-112 Charlo ( like the official judges ). That does not mean that I would accuse him of not knowing how to score.
Every visit you confirm your cvntishness.
Your opinion means nothing to me.
Re: Lara v Marti card
A draw is very reasonable. The fight was extremely close, and almost every round could've went either way. The only clear rounds in that fight to me were Rounds 2 and 8 for Lara, and Round 12 for Vanes. The rest were all razor thin.Tanzio wrote:He won officially. You think that it was clearly. I saw a draw.Lancenix wrote:Lara clearly won. Sorry you do not know how to score. Maybe you will improve. But I doubt it. How could you criticize other people scoring a fight when you don't know how to score a fight yourself??Tanzio wrote: "Actually" you are a pudendum and a coward. You might notice that I never criticize others' scores whether they match the official scoring or not.
Marti fought well. I'd have given him the decision by a point if not for the penalty. A pudendum like you ridiculing my scores is a compliment. Gilgamesh pointing out that we scored the last two fights oppositely is what decent forum conversation is about. He had Charlo v Trout a draw. I had it 116-112 Charlo ( like the official judges ). That does not mean that I would accuse him of not knowing how to score.
Every visit you confirm your cvntishness.
Your opinion means nothing to me.
Re: Lara v Marti card
I enjoyed the hell out of this card. Excellent boxing throughout. I think the criticism of Lara is unwarranted. He is a master boxer. He boxed well tonight but Marti had his number, imo. Vanes made Lara miss, a lot, and he stuck to the game plan.gilgamesh wrote:There were at least 5 rounds in that Charlo vs Trout fight that could've went either way. That was a hard one to score. Hell almost every round on that card was kinda hard to score. Competitive matchups. Maybe not the most exciting in the world, but certainly competitive.Tanzio wrote:"Actually" you are a pudendum and a coward. You might notice that I never criticize others' scores whether they match the official scoring or not.Lancenix wrote:
Actually i scored the other fights you screwed up. I couldn't score today and save all of your errors like I have been. You are a poor scorer and you try to make the fights closer than they are. You have proven it once again.
Marti fought well. I'd have given him the decision by a point if not for the penalty. A pudendum like you ridiculing my scores is a compliment. Gilgamesh pointing out that we scored the last two fights oppositely is what decent forum conversation is about. He had Charlo v Trout a draw. I had it 116-112 Charlo ( like the official judges ). That does not mean that I would accuse him of not knowing how to score.
Every visit you confirm your cvntishness.
Jackson was the biggest surprise of the evening. Sweet boxer. To Charlo's credit though, he overcame jackson's superior skill.
Re: Lara v Marti card
The fact that we're saying Jackson's superior skill is definitely a shocker to me. I never would've guessed he'd have been outboxing Charlo.Tanzio wrote:I enjoyed the hell out of this card. Excellent boxing throughout. I think the criticism of Lara is unwarranted. He is a master boxer. He boxed well tonight but Marti had his number, imo. Vanes made Lara miss, a lot, and he stuck to the game plan.gilgamesh wrote:There were at least 5 rounds in that Charlo vs Trout fight that could've went either way. That was a hard one to score. Hell almost every round on that card was kinda hard to score. Competitive matchups. Maybe not the most exciting in the world, but certainly competitive.Tanzio wrote: "Actually" you are a pudendum and a coward. You might notice that I never criticize others' scores whether they match the official scoring or not.
Marti fought well. I'd have given him the decision by a point if not for the penalty. A pudendum like you ridiculing my scores is a compliment. Gilgamesh pointing out that we scored the last two fights oppositely is what decent forum conversation is about. He had Charlo v Trout a draw. I had it 116-112 Charlo ( like the official judges ). That does not mean that I would accuse him of not knowing how to score.
Every visit you confirm your cvntishness.
Jackson was the biggest surprise of the evening. Sweet boxer. To Charlo's credit though, he overcame jackson's superior skill.
Re: Lara v Marti card
It was beautiful. He turned Charlo into a chaser. Charlo was getting a lesson until the final round. He really earned my respect tonight, finding a way to overcome Jackson's picturesque performance.gilgamesh wrote:The fact that we're saying Jackson's superior skill is definitely a shocker to me. I never would've guessed he'd have been outboxing Charlo.Tanzio wrote:I enjoyed the hell out of this card. Excellent boxing throughout. I think the criticism of Lara is unwarranted. He is a master boxer. He boxed well tonight but Marti had his number, imo. Vanes made Lara miss, a lot, and he stuck to the game plan.gilgamesh wrote:
There were at least 5 rounds in that Charlo vs Trout fight that could've went either way. That was a hard one to score. Hell almost every round on that card was kinda hard to score. Competitive matchups. Maybe not the most exciting in the world, but certainly competitive.
Jackson was the biggest surprise of the evening. Sweet boxer. To Charlo's credit though, he overcame jackson's superior skill.
Re: Lara v Marti card
You seem to know it all, mate. Tanzio may well have been following boxing long enough to remember professional scoring before the influence of post '88 Olympics amateur scoring had on it. Lara is also one of the hardest fighte....boxers to score, frankly, I wouldn't give him half the rounds that other, younger guys give him, he's not a fighter and doesn't ever really show effective aggression.Lancenix wrote:A DRAW for Tanzio!! LOL The scorecard nightmare and the WORST RBR in the business.Tanzio wrote:Rd 12= marti pounds away. Lara picking away. Marti going after him. Lara comes back. 115-115 draw for me.