Lara v Marti card

Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by Lancenix »

Tanzio wrote:
Lancenix wrote:
Tanzio wrote:Rd11= they take a point from Marti! Lara combo on the resume. Nice left Marti. Marti knows he needs to come on. People saying this is boring r full of sh!t

106-105 lara
Now everyone is seeing what I have said for a while. You DO NOT KNOW how to score a fight.
Go fvck yourself coward.
115-112 116-111X2 all three for Lara. Tanzio had it a DRAW!!! LOL he just does not know how to score a fight and I have been saying that for how long??? Now he just proves his scorecards are bogus once again. :lol: :lol:
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by Tanzio »

Excellent fight. Too wide for me. No problem with Lara getting the win though.
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by Lancenix »

Tanzio wrote:Rd 12= marti pounds away. Lara picking away. Marti going after him. Lara comes back. 115-115 draw for me.
A DRAW for Tanzio!! LOL The scorecard nightmare and the WORST RBR in the business. :lol:
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by crusader »

lol at the people who think GGG is ducking Lara
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17400
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by Baby Face Finster »

American Dream my ass. Send the bore back to Cuba.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by Tanzio »

Lancenix wrote:
Tanzio wrote:
Lancenix wrote:
Now everyone is seeing what I have said for a while. You DO NOT KNOW how to score a fight.
Go fvck yourself coward.
115-112 116-111X2 all three for Lara. Tanzio had it a DRAW!!! LOL he just does not know how to score a fight and I have been saying that for how long??? Now he just proves his scorecards are bogus once again. :lol: :lol:
Your nutz are so microscopic that you don't score at all you b!tch. Your criticism is based on official scoring. Gfy coward.
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by boxing_rocks »

Vanes looked better against Lara than Canelo did. His problem was that he didn't have Canelo's judges.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by crusader »

I had it 115-112 Lara, although it should've been 115-113 because the deduction was bogus.
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by Lancenix »

Tanzio wrote:
Lancenix wrote:
Tanzio wrote: Go fvck yourself coward.
115-112 116-111X2 all three for Lara. Tanzio had it a DRAW!!! LOL he just does not know how to score a fight and I have been saying that for how long??? Now he just proves his scorecards are bogus once again. :lol: :lol:
Your nutz are so microscopic that you don't score at all you b!tch. Your criticism is based on official scoring. Gfy coward.
Actually i scored the other fights you screwed up. I couldn't score today and save all of your errors like I have been. You are a poor scorer and you try to make the fights closer than they are. You have proven it once again.
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by Lancenix »

Tanzio wrote:
Lancenix wrote:
Tanzio wrote: Go fvck yourself coward.
115-112 116-111X2 all three for Lara. Tanzio had it a DRAW!!! LOL he just does not know how to score a fight and I have been saying that for how long??? Now he just proves his scorecards are bogus once again. :lol: :lol:
Your nutz are so microscopic that you don't score at all you b!tch. Your criticism is based on official scoring. Gfy coward.
I said your card was off during the fight actually. Anyone can see that. You need to take a novice boxing judging class or something. IDK
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17400
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by Baby Face Finster »

Fighters like Rigondull and Lara are a cancer on the sport. The sooner they are out of the game the better for it's overall well being. Fighters who do the very least possible need to be punished for their negative boxing with low paydays and no tv contracts.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46550
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by gilgamesh »

crusader wrote:I had it 115-112 Lara, although it should've been 115-113 because the deduction was bogus.
I had it 115-113, but that's because I had the first round even 10-10.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46550
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by gilgamesh »

boxing_rocks wrote:Vanes looked better against Lara than Canelo did. His problem was that he didn't have Canelo's judges.
No he didn't.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46550
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by gilgamesh »

Tanzio wrote:116-112 charlo for me
I had Trout vs Jermall Charlo a draw personally. 114-114
Impractical Poster
Middleweight
Posts: 7636
Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by Impractical Poster »

I figured Lara would call out GGG in the post fight interview. Guess not. He would rather call out Canelo.

Close fight. After watching this, I agree with with Gilgamesh. G would have little problem with this guy. However, if the fight ever takes place, G will get no credit for demolishing a LMW, and instead get crap for not moving up.

But think about it, if he really wanted G, why didn't he call him out instead of Canelo tonight? He does not want that fight. So give it a rest.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by Tanzio »

Lancenix wrote:
Tanzio wrote:
Lancenix wrote:
115-112 116-111X2 all three for Lara. Tanzio had it a DRAW!!! LOL he just does not know how to score a fight and I have been saying that for how long??? Now he just proves his scorecards are bogus once again. :lol: :lol:
Your nutz are so microscopic that you don't score at all you b!tch. Your criticism is based on official scoring. Gfy coward.
Actually i scored the other fights you screwed up. I couldn't score today and save all of your errors like I have been. You are a poor scorer and you try to make the fights closer than they are. You have proven it once again.
"Actually" you are a pudendum and a coward. You might notice that I never criticize others' scores whether they match the official scoring or not.

Marti fought well. I'd have given him the decision by a point if not for the penalty. A pudendum like you ridiculing my scores is a compliment. Gilgamesh pointing out that we scored the last two fights oppositely is what decent forum conversation is about. He had Charlo v Trout a draw. I had it 116-112 Charlo ( like the official judges ). That does not mean that I would accuse him of not knowing how to score.

Every visit you confirm your cvntishness.
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by Lancenix »

Tanzio wrote:
Lancenix wrote:
Tanzio wrote: Your nutz are so microscopic that you don't score at all you b!tch. Your criticism is based on official scoring. Gfy coward.
Actually i scored the other fights you screwed up. I couldn't score today and save all of your errors like I have been. You are a poor scorer and you try to make the fights closer than they are. You have proven it once again.
"Actually" you are a pudendum and a coward. You might notice that I never criticize others' scores whether they match the official scoring or not.

Marti fought well. I'd have given him the decision by a point if not for the penalty. A pudendum like you ridiculing my scores is a compliment. Gilgamesh pointing out that we scored the last two fights oppositely is what decent forum conversation is about. He had Charlo v Trout a draw. I had it 116-112 Charlo ( like the official judges ). That does not mean that I would accuse him of not knowing how to score.

Every visit you confirm your cvntishness.
Lara clearly won. Sorry you do not know how to score. Maybe you will improve. But I doubt it. How could you criticize other people scoring a fight when you don't know how to score a fight yourself??
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by Tanzio »

gilgamesh wrote:
Tanzio wrote:116-112 charlo for me
I had Trout vs Jermall Charlo a draw personally. 114-114
I think that Charlo did what GingerHead did in the championship rounds; cruise in the confidence of having a lead. GingerHead had open scoring to confirm it though.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46550
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by gilgamesh »

Tanzio wrote:
Lancenix wrote:
Tanzio wrote: Your nutz are so microscopic that you don't score at all you b!tch. Your criticism is based on official scoring. Gfy coward.
Actually i scored the other fights you screwed up. I couldn't score today and save all of your errors like I have been. You are a poor scorer and you try to make the fights closer than they are. You have proven it once again.
"Actually" you are a pudendum and a coward. You might notice that I never criticize others' scores whether they match the official scoring or not.

Marti fought well. I'd have given him the decision by a point if not for the penalty. A pudendum like you ridiculing my scores is a compliment. Gilgamesh pointing out that we scored the last two fights oppositely is what decent forum conversation is about. He had Charlo v Trout a draw. I had it 116-112 Charlo ( like the official judges ). That does not mean that I would accuse him of not knowing how to score.

Every visit you confirm your cvntishness.
There were at least 5 rounds in that Charlo vs Trout fight that could've went either way. That was a hard one to score. Hell almost every round on that card was kinda hard to score. Competitive matchups. Maybe not the most exciting in the world, but certainly competitive.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by Tanzio »

Lancenix wrote:
Tanzio wrote:
Lancenix wrote:
Actually i scored the other fights you screwed up. I couldn't score today and save all of your errors like I have been. You are a poor scorer and you try to make the fights closer than they are. You have proven it once again.
"Actually" you are a pudendum and a coward. You might notice that I never criticize others' scores whether they match the official scoring or not.

Marti fought well. I'd have given him the decision by a point if not for the penalty. A pudendum like you ridiculing my scores is a compliment. Gilgamesh pointing out that we scored the last two fights oppositely is what decent forum conversation is about. He had Charlo v Trout a draw. I had it 116-112 Charlo ( like the official judges ). That does not mean that I would accuse him of not knowing how to score.

Every visit you confirm your cvntishness.
Lara clearly won. Sorry you do not know how to score. Maybe you will improve. But I doubt it. How could you criticize other people scoring a fight when you don't know how to score a fight yourself??
He won officially. You think that it was clearly. I saw a draw.

Your opinion means nothing to me.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46550
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by gilgamesh »

Tanzio wrote:
Lancenix wrote:
Tanzio wrote: "Actually" you are a pudendum and a coward. You might notice that I never criticize others' scores whether they match the official scoring or not.

Marti fought well. I'd have given him the decision by a point if not for the penalty. A pudendum like you ridiculing my scores is a compliment. Gilgamesh pointing out that we scored the last two fights oppositely is what decent forum conversation is about. He had Charlo v Trout a draw. I had it 116-112 Charlo ( like the official judges ). That does not mean that I would accuse him of not knowing how to score.

Every visit you confirm your cvntishness.
Lara clearly won. Sorry you do not know how to score. Maybe you will improve. But I doubt it. How could you criticize other people scoring a fight when you don't know how to score a fight yourself??
He won officially. You think that it was clearly. I saw a draw.

Your opinion means nothing to me.
A draw is very reasonable. The fight was extremely close, and almost every round could've went either way. The only clear rounds in that fight to me were Rounds 2 and 8 for Lara, and Round 12 for Vanes. The rest were all razor thin.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by Tanzio »

gilgamesh wrote:
Tanzio wrote:
Lancenix wrote:
Actually i scored the other fights you screwed up. I couldn't score today and save all of your errors like I have been. You are a poor scorer and you try to make the fights closer than they are. You have proven it once again.
"Actually" you are a pudendum and a coward. You might notice that I never criticize others' scores whether they match the official scoring or not.

Marti fought well. I'd have given him the decision by a point if not for the penalty. A pudendum like you ridiculing my scores is a compliment. Gilgamesh pointing out that we scored the last two fights oppositely is what decent forum conversation is about. He had Charlo v Trout a draw. I had it 116-112 Charlo ( like the official judges ). That does not mean that I would accuse him of not knowing how to score.

Every visit you confirm your cvntishness.
There were at least 5 rounds in that Charlo vs Trout fight that could've went either way. That was a hard one to score. Hell almost every round on that card was kinda hard to score. Competitive matchups. Maybe not the most exciting in the world, but certainly competitive.
I enjoyed the hell out of this card. Excellent boxing throughout. I think the criticism of Lara is unwarranted. He is a master boxer. He boxed well tonight but Marti had his number, imo. Vanes made Lara miss, a lot, and he stuck to the game plan.

Jackson was the biggest surprise of the evening. Sweet boxer. To Charlo's credit though, he overcame jackson's superior skill.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46550
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by gilgamesh »

Tanzio wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Tanzio wrote: "Actually" you are a pudendum and a coward. You might notice that I never criticize others' scores whether they match the official scoring or not.

Marti fought well. I'd have given him the decision by a point if not for the penalty. A pudendum like you ridiculing my scores is a compliment. Gilgamesh pointing out that we scored the last two fights oppositely is what decent forum conversation is about. He had Charlo v Trout a draw. I had it 116-112 Charlo ( like the official judges ). That does not mean that I would accuse him of not knowing how to score.

Every visit you confirm your cvntishness.
There were at least 5 rounds in that Charlo vs Trout fight that could've went either way. That was a hard one to score. Hell almost every round on that card was kinda hard to score. Competitive matchups. Maybe not the most exciting in the world, but certainly competitive.
I enjoyed the hell out of this card. Excellent boxing throughout. I think the criticism of Lara is unwarranted. He is a master boxer. He boxed well tonight but Marti had his number, imo. Vanes made Lara miss, a lot, and he stuck to the game plan.

Jackson was the biggest surprise of the evening. Sweet boxer. To Charlo's credit though, he overcame jackson's superior skill.
The fact that we're saying Jackson's superior skill is definitely a shocker to me. I never would've guessed he'd have been outboxing Charlo.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by Tanzio »

gilgamesh wrote:
Tanzio wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
There were at least 5 rounds in that Charlo vs Trout fight that could've went either way. That was a hard one to score. Hell almost every round on that card was kinda hard to score. Competitive matchups. Maybe not the most exciting in the world, but certainly competitive.
I enjoyed the hell out of this card. Excellent boxing throughout. I think the criticism of Lara is unwarranted. He is a master boxer. He boxed well tonight but Marti had his number, imo. Vanes made Lara miss, a lot, and he stuck to the game plan.

Jackson was the biggest surprise of the evening. Sweet boxer. To Charlo's credit though, he overcame jackson's superior skill.
The fact that we're saying Jackson's superior skill is definitely a shocker to me. I never would've guessed he'd have been outboxing Charlo.
It was beautiful. He turned Charlo into a chaser. Charlo was getting a lesson until the final round. He really earned my respect tonight, finding a way to overcome Jackson's picturesque performance.
dberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3350
Joined: 05 Jan 2010, 02:15

Re: Lara v Marti card

Post by dberry »

Lancenix wrote:
Tanzio wrote:Rd 12= marti pounds away. Lara picking away. Marti going after him. Lara comes back. 115-115 draw for me.
A DRAW for Tanzio!! LOL The scorecard nightmare and the WORST RBR in the business. :lol:
You seem to know it all, mate. Tanzio may well have been following boxing long enough to remember professional scoring before the influence of post '88 Olympics amateur scoring had on it. Lara is also one of the hardest fighte....boxers to score, frankly, I wouldn't give him half the rounds that other, younger guys give him, he's not a fighter and doesn't ever really show effective aggression.
Post Reply