Page 4 of 6
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 10:48
by Horse
Ian1973 wrote:Bellew is better at Cruiserweight than he was at light heavy but he is still at that level that is a level below genuine world class despite being a title holder.
Bellew was world class at light heavyweight and he's world class at cruiserweight.
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 11:00
by Ian1973
Horse wrote:Ian1973 wrote:Bellew is better at Cruiserweight than he was at light heavy but he is still at that level that is a level below genuine world class despite being a title holder.
Bellew was world class at light heavyweight and he's world class at cruiserweight.
I wouldn't say he was world class at light heavy for certain. Stevenson hammered him, Kovalev would destroy him in a round or two and the likes of Fonfara would probably beat him, probably Pascal also.
Cruiserweight is a less competitive and slightly easier division .................. IMO of course.
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 11:07
by Bard of Boxrec
Horse wrote:Ian1973 wrote:Bellew is better at Cruiserweight than he was at light heavy but he is still at that level that is a level below genuine world class despite being a title holder.
Bellew was world class at light heavyweight and he's world class at cruiserweight.
No.
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 11:08
by Horse
Ian1973 wrote:I wouldn't say he was world class at light heavy for certain. Stevenson hammered him,
Stevenson is a P4Per with a P4P level of punching power.
That doesn't mean that Bellew wasn't world class.
Ian1973 wrote:Kovalev would destroy him in a round or two
That fight didn't happen, so how can you hold a fictional fight against him?
Ian1973 wrote:and the likes of Fonfara would probably beat him, probably Pascal also.
"Probably", but the fights didn't happen, so we don't know.
Ian1973 wrote:Cruiserweight is a less competitive and slightly easier division .................. IMO of course.
It seems that way.
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 11:08
by Horse
Riddick Blowe wrote:No.
Yes.
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 11:09
by ILikeBeer
Horse wrote:Riddick Blowe wrote:No.
Yes.
Maybe.
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 11:09
by Bard of Boxrec
Horse wrote:Riddick Blowe wrote:No.
Yes.
Bellew looked awful vs Makubu. Slow, ponderous, open. He caught the guy and finished him off, well done. We learned nothing new about him.
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 11:11
by Horse
Riddick Blowe wrote:Bellew looked awful vs Makubu. Slow, ponderous, open. He caught the guy and finished him off, well done. We learned nothing new about him.
We learned that he's world class at cruiserweight.
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 11:18
by Bard of Boxrec
Horse wrote:Riddick Blowe wrote:Bellew looked awful vs Makubu. Slow, ponderous, open. He caught the guy and finished him off, well done. We learned nothing new about him.
We learned that he's world class at cruiserweight.
Nah. Makubu showed potential in footage but he was never that hard to hit and I suspect Bellew really doesn't have as much POWAH as folk give him credit for.
I don't expect Makubu to come back and do anything to suggest he is a top contender in this division, maybe fringe. I think he will get stopped by someone as good or slightly worse than Bellew in the next few fights if he gets used by other promoters. But Bellew will have been too, and it will all have the effect of discrediting this supposed 'world level' matchup.
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 11:21
by Horse
Riddick Blowe wrote:Nah. Makubu showed potential in footage but he was never that hard to hit and I suspect Bellew really doesn't have as much POWAH as folk give him credit for.
I don't expect Makubu to come back and do anything to suggest he is a top contender in this division. I think he will get stopped by someone slightly worse than Bellew in the next few fights if he gets used by other contenders. But Bellew will have been too, and it will all have the effect of discrediting this supposed 'world level' matchup.
Bellew is a far more proven fighter than Joshua though, you'll admit that?
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 11:24
by Bard of Boxrec
Horse wrote:Bellew is a far more proven fighter than Joshua though, you'll admit that?
In terms of records, which I know you view as the be all and end all, I guess you could say that, but I'm not sure why it's relevant.
On the eye test Bellew has proved enough to show he isn't any more than a mid-lower top ten guy at best.
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 11:30
by Horse
Riddick Blowe wrote:In terms of records, which I know you view as the be all and end all, I guess you could say that, but I'm not sure why it's relevant.
You criticise a proven world class fighter like Bellew and talk down his best wins and then act like Joshua is God's gift to boxing when he has done bugger all.
Records matter, Bellew is proven. Show some respect.
Riddick Blowe wrote:On the eye test Bellew has proved enough to show he isn't any more than a mid-lower top ten guy at best.
Your detestable eye test.
It's easy to look good against bums and far more difficult to look good against top level opposition.
Bellew doesn't fight many chumps, so he's never likely to be able to beat Joshua when it comes to the eye test.
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 11:38
by Bard of Boxrec
Horse wrote:Riddick Blowe wrote:In terms of records, which I know you view as the be all and end all, I guess you could say that, but I'm not sure why it's relevant.
You criticise a proven world class fighter like Bellew and talk down his best wins and then act like Joshua is God's gift to boxing when he has done bugger all.
Records matter, Bellew is proven. Show some respect.
Riddick Blowe wrote:On the eye test Bellew has proved enough to show he isn't any more than a mid-lower top ten guy at best.
Your detestable eye test.
It's easy to look good against bums and far more difficult to look good against top level opposition.
Bellew doesn't fight many chumps, so he's never likely to be able to beat Joshua when it comes to the eye test.
Did Bellew ever look good against bums? He always looked the same from my memories. Limited.
Anyway, it doesn't matter. Joshua will destroy some guy you deem 'worthy' and hopefully you can show some class about it.
besides, in Whyte Joshua has arguably a better win than any of Bellew's.
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 11:41
by nitro5912
Horse wrote:Riddick Blowe wrote:In terms of records, which I know you view as the be all and end all, I guess you could say that, but I'm not sure why it's relevant.
You criticise a proven world class fighter like Bellew and talk down his best wins and then act like Joshua is God's gift to boxing when he has done bugger all.
Records matter, Bellew is proven. Show some respect.
Riddick Blowe wrote:On the eye test Bellew has proved enough to show he isn't any more than a mid-lower top ten guy at best.
Your detestable eye test.
It's easy to look good against bums and far more difficult to look good against top level opposition.
Bellew doesn't fight many chumps, so he's never likely to be able to beat Joshua when it comes to the eye test.
Bellew doesn't fight chumps?
How about 2 of his 4 fights since cleverly are ranked at 98 and 163 in the world on box rec. Masternak isn't ranked top 20. The 2 guys he faced before cleverly are both ranked top 300 in the world.
That's 4 of 7 fights of guys who are ranked outside the top 90, cleverly who isn't ranked as cruiser and only 1 top 20 Boxrec fighter.
Bellew has been fed chumps since Stevenson KO'd his ass. I think he is still suffering if he is serious about moving up to heavy to fight haye.
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 11:50
by Horse
Riddick Blowe wrote:besides, in Whyte Joshua has arguably a better win than any of Bellew's.
Pathetic comment.
Whyte is not even a proven English title level fighter.
Pathetic.
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 11:53
by Bard of Boxrec
Horse wrote:Riddick Blowe wrote:besides, in Whyte Joshua has arguably a better win than any of Bellew's.
Pathetic comment.
Whyte is not even a proven English title level fighter.
Pathetic.
The only thing that would stop Whyte from 'proving' himself a fighter at least as good as Chilemba would be how badly he was crushed vs Joshua.
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 11:54
by Horse
Riddick Blowe wrote:The only thing that would stop Whyte from becoming a fighter at least as good as Chilemba would be how badly he was crushed vs Joshua.
Of course.
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 11:54
by Bard of Boxrec
Horse wrote:Riddick Blowe wrote:The only thing that would stop Whyte from becoming a fighter at least as good as Chilemba would be how badly he was crushed vs Joshua.
Of course.
Glad you're starting to see sense.
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 11:55
by Horse
nitro5912 wrote:Bellew has been fed chumps since Stevenson KO'd his ass.
No, he hasn't.
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 11:56
by Horse
Riddick Blowe wrote:Glad you're starting to see sense.
I was being sarcastic.
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 11:58
by Bard of Boxrec
Horse wrote:Riddick Blowe wrote:Glad you're starting to see sense.
I was being sarcastic.
The illusion is over
![[icon_e_sad.gif] :verysad:](./images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif)
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 12:02
by Controversial
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 12:13
by nitro5912
Horse wrote:nitro5912 wrote:Bellew has been fed chumps since Stevenson KO'd his ass.
No, he hasn't.
Look at who he has fought. Chump city is where bellew has been residing.
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 12:51
by Cyclops
Re: Bellew calling out Haye
Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 13:16
by Horse
nitro5912 wrote:Look at who he has fought. Chump city is where bellew has been residing.
No.