Page 4 of 4
Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers
Posted: 05 Jun 2016, 11:14
by Horse
keithmoonhangover wrote:Answer the question Horse. Why not?

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers
Posted: 05 Jun 2016, 11:23
by keithmoonhangover
Horse wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:Answer the question Horse. Why not?

No Horse, it's this

That's what happens. Give it a try.
Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers
Posted: 05 Jun 2016, 12:41
by Taansend
Maybe we could look at alternatives for the word Bum
Derriere has a certain panache to it.
Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers
Posted: 06 Jun 2016, 06:38
by chrisnew86
I know its a little off topic but I have emailed Queensbury about VIP tickets for me and my bird for his last 2 shows and I didn't even get a reply..... That's poor poor form.
Missed out on decent money , how many times is this happening ? Next thing he is giving away tickets to his shows because they haven't sold many tickets.
On the flip side, if you contact Matchroom you get a response in no time
Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers
Posted: 06 Jun 2016, 13:22
by knockout
chrisnew86 wrote:I know its a little off topic but I have emailed Queensbury about VIP tickets for me and my bird for his last 2 shows and I didn't even get a reply..... That's poor poor form.
Missed out on decent money , how many times is this happening ? Next thing he is giving away tickets to his shows because they haven't sold many tickets.
On the flip side, if you contact Matchroom you get a response in no time
A bit of Customer service and a young PR guy/girl who understands how the internet works for marketing ! It's not rocket science is it :)
Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers
Posted: 06 Jun 2016, 13:31
by Stuarty
Taansend wrote:Maybe we could look at alternatives for the word Bum
Derriere has a certain panache to it.
Back fanny?
Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers
Posted: 06 Jun 2016, 14:01
by Loynesy
I don't personally use the word "bum" to describe fighters, but as its been part of the boxing lexicon for at least 80 years, particularly in New York (check out Joe Louis opponents), I'm not sure it's one to get overly self righteous about.
Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers
Posted: 06 Jun 2016, 14:24
by ShadrachSimmo
Stuarty30 wrote:Taansend wrote:Maybe we could look at alternatives for the word Bum
Derriere has a certain panache to it.
Back fanny?
Foo fighter?
Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers
Posted: 06 Jun 2016, 14:45
by Horse
Taansend wrote:Maybe we could look at alternatives for the word Bum
Derriere has a certain panache to it.
Poopers.
Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers
Posted: 07 Jun 2016, 16:35
by chad
Taansend wrote:Maybe we could look at alternatives for the word Bum
Derriere has a certain panache to it.
Rusty ring?
Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers
Posted: 07 Jun 2016, 17:10
by Taansend
chad wrote:Taansend wrote:Maybe we could look at alternatives for the word Bum
Derriere has a certain panache to it.
Rusty ring?
Rusty Sheriffs Badge was a favourite phrase of an old mate of mine.....
Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers
Posted: 07 Jun 2016, 17:26
by jameswilson
Gary Glitter - Shitter!
Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers
Posted: 08 Jun 2016, 13:11
by CaptainSpacerod
Devil's Pocket
Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers
Posted: 13 Jun 2016, 14:09
by wesshaw1985
Willie Monroe ready and willing to come over and face either Smith or Saunders, W@rren needs to make it happen -
http://www.BS.com/willie-monro ... rs--105641
Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers
Posted: 13 Jun 2016, 14:34
by crusader
Monroe just handily beat John Thompson, who is arguably Smith's best opponent, and I think he could give Liam some issues.
Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers
Posted: 13 Jun 2016, 14:37
by handsofstone
crusader wrote:Monroe just handily beat John Thompson, who is arguably Smith's best opponent, and I think he could give Liam some issues.
He definitely outboxes Smith,just as Thompson did at the beginning,its just can Monroe avoid being walked down and stopped??
Liam despite his weak resume is an effective fighter
Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers
Posted: 13 Jun 2016, 14:38
by wesshaw1985
crusader wrote:Monroe just handily beat John Thompson, who is arguably Smith's best opponent, and I think he could give Liam some issues.
Monroe would be an interesting opponent that would draw fans and draw viewers.
Makes sense for all involved...
Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers
Posted: 13 Jun 2016, 14:41
by crusader
Monroe is a better boxer than Thompson and less fragile IMO. He can be negative at times and I'd still go for Liam to get into gear eventually and outwork him, but I don't think LS's proven yet that he's on another level.
Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers
Posted: 13 Jun 2016, 17:17
by hitman_hatton1
Autobarn wrote:Is that Calzaghe-Pudwill and Maccarinelli-Lamontagne?
herbie hide vs damon reed will always stand alone as the worst w*rren world title match up.
that was beyond shameful.
reed was just a clubfighter.
![[icon_knockout.gif] :KO:](./images/smilies/icon_knockout.gif)
Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers
Posted: 13 Jun 2016, 20:10
by ElJefe
crusader wrote:Monroe just handily beat John Thompson, who is arguably Smith's best opponent, and I think he could give Liam some issues.
Would be a good fight, I'd back Liam to catch up to him late and either force a stoppage or a 116-112 type win on the cards. Not comparing Liam to GGG in any way at all but seeing Monroe quit against Golovkin makes me question if he'd deal with a solid pressure fighter for 12 rounds. Liam wouldn't budge all night and I'm not 100% sure that Monroe has it in him to deal with that. Again, not comparing Smith to GGG who is a freak of nature, but that showed a mental weakness in Monroe imo.