Re: Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 31 Jul 2016, 18:33
If you fought only the best opponents -- who won every fight very clearly and who are still undefeated in at least 22 fights -- then you'd already be the World Champion.. You limit your opponent selection to almost zero is that has to be the criteria.. Plus I didn't rank Martin anywhere near the top because of the effortless way Joshua dispatched him.BitPlayer wrote:Only because of more than one gift decision, and fighting not the best opponents. Martin was fighting for the NABO title before the Glazkov fight.Kalan wrote:Glazkov was undefeated in 22 fights... You look historically and he would have iced many Heavyweight Challengers of the past.. He beat Tomasz Adamek with ease... You're calling him a bum, yet he beat Steve Cunningham and drew with Malik Scott... He's not a bad heavyweight and was never close to being stopped before he met Charles Martin -- whose only defeat came at the hands of Anthony Joshua.Counter-puncher wrote:
so, Glazkov didn't deserve a title shot, he was easily beaten, so really anyone praising Charles Martin is doing so on the basis of him 'beating' a bum by way of retirement through injury. which means nobody can say anything positive about Charles Martin without looking like a bit of a fool, am I getting you right here?