Page 4 of 6
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 04:11
by Andrew
Hearn was saying he doesn't want this fight unless Fury gets stripped and the other belts are on the lines.
THIS FIGHT DOESNT NEED F**KING BELTS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Right now this fight would be huge and if AJ destroyed Wlad then he becomes the man because it looks like Fury is never fighting again.
Hearn just making excuses this fight isn't happening.
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 05:45
by TheGman
Horse wrote:Fitzy901 wrote:Why not..
Because Joshua will get destroyed and it's not even the biggest money-spinning fight out there for Joshua, especially at this sort of short notice.
Joshua hasn't even stepped up to fight the level of opponent that Wladimir used to dominate (like Pulev or Jennings) yet.
Neither did fury but he dazzled klitschko with his fancy foot work. I think joshua would beat klit with 5 rounds
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 05:47
by TheGman
Horse wrote:Riddick Blowe wrote:I know, the fight probably won't happen and all, but there's no harm in dreaming. Would be the perfect way for Wlad to end his career.
Destroying some hypejob would be an alright end to his career, but hardly perfect.
Horse your talkin out ur ass again,av u been the sugar hut with hearn cause i can smell sh1te comin from u too
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 05:48
by TheGman
Horse wrote:Rexob wrote:Perfect fight for joshua wlad is shot living off the past now, hasnt fought in a year over 40 perfect just perfect for aj to step up.
Joshua has done nothing to suggest that he can beat Wlad.
Wlad is about 4 steps up from Joshua. He'll get annihilated.
Again i can smell sh1t, horse
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 05:49
by TheGman
Horse wrote:Syntax Error wrote:Wladimir WAS 4 steps up from Joshua: not so sure now.
He looked old versus Fury & that was year ago.
Although it's not his fault, he's done nothing for a year & he's 41 now.
If I was Joshua, I'd be chomping at the bit to fight Wlad.
If Joshua is so great then why hasn't he fought any genuine top 15 world ranked fighters yet?
For a world champion Joshua's record is pathetic.
Fighters that Wladimir has dominated in the last 2 years, Pulev and Jennings, are far better than anyone that Joshua has beaten.
Neither did fury
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 05:50
by TheGman
Horse wrote:Rexob wrote:It's the only way that Joshua can show the Horse that he is world class.
1. Tyson Fury
2. Wladimir Klitschko
3. Alexander Povetkin
4. Deontay Wilder
5. Luis Ortiz
6. Kubrat Pulev
7. Joseph Parker
Beating any of this lot would prove that Joshua is world class. Beating anyone in the top 15 would give him a claim as well.
Haters are always gonna hate its as simple as that
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 06:08
by Bard of Boxrec
Horse thinks not having a 'top ten win' (whatever that is worth in this shitty division) automatically precludes someone from picking Joshua over wladimir.
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 06:24
by TheGman
Joshua will destroy klitschko within 5/6 rounds and my reasons are klit is gun shy and we all know how joshua throws his punches,ther in bunches so klit wont be able to get any shots off. As for horse mentioning jennings, ortiz knocked jennings out,fury went the distance with johnson and joshua knocked johnson out,these fights mean nothing if josh fights klit but seems as tho horse wants to bring fights up i thought i would too :-). Styles make fights and this wouldnt be a fight just a one sided beat down on klit
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 06:29
by Bard of Boxrec
thechump wrote:Joshua will destroy klitschko within 5/6 rounds and my reasons are klit is gun shy and we all know how joshua throws his punches,ther in bunches so klit wont be able to get any shots off. As for horse mentioning jennings, ortiz knocked jennings out,fury went the distance with johnson and joshua knocked johnson out,these fights mean nothing if josh fights klit but seems as tho horse wants to bring fights up i thought i would too :-). Styles make fights and this wouldnt be a fight just a one sided beat down on klit
Agree. Fight gets made, bookies can't split them, print money.
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 06:52
by Horse
Joshua is the most overrated fighter on earth.
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 06:55
by BitPlayer
Naandrew wrote:Hearn was saying he doesn't want this fight unless Fury gets stripped and the other belts are on the lines.
THIS FIGHT DOESNT NEED F**KING BELTS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Right now this fight would be huge and if AJ destroyed Wlad then he becomes the man because it looks like Fury is never fighting again.
Hearn just making excuses this fight isn't happening.
A guy coming off a loss and a guy who hasn't beaten a single proven world level opponent should not be fighting for vacant world titles, let alone 2 or 3.
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 06:56
by BitPlayer
Riddick Blowe wrote:Horse thinks not having a 'top ten win' (whatever that is worth in this shitty division) automatically precludes someone from picking Joshua over wladimir.
It means not having a win over a top ten fighter.
And here something weird, if the competition is poor, that means you need to fight higher ranked opponents to be credible, not lower.
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 07:00
by Rexob
Horse wrote:Joshua is the most overrated fighter on earth.
Yes, probably true at the minute until he steps up.
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 07:11
by TheGman
Horse wrote:Joshua is the most overrated fighter on earth.
Horse is the most sh1t talking boxing forum poster on earth
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 07:12
by TheGman
Riddick Blowe wrote:thechump wrote:Joshua will destroy klitschko within 5/6 rounds and my reasons are klit is gun shy and we all know how joshua throws his punches,ther in bunches so klit wont be able to get any shots off. As for horse mentioning jennings, ortiz knocked jennings out,fury went the distance with johnson and joshua knocked johnson out,these fights mean nothing if josh fights klit but seems as tho horse wants to bring fights up i thought i would too :-). Styles make fights and this wouldnt be a fight just a one sided beat down on klit
Agree. Fight gets made, bookies can't split them, print money.
They will have klit fav but i will put my house on joshua beating him inside the distance,pretty easy aswell
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 07:13
by Andrew
BitPlayer wrote:Naandrew wrote:Hearn was saying he doesn't want this fight unless Fury gets stripped and the other belts are on the lines.
THIS FIGHT DOESNT NEED F**KING BELTS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Right now this fight would be huge and if AJ destroyed Wlad then he becomes the man because it looks like Fury is never fighting again.
Hearn just making excuses this fight isn't happening.
A guy coming off a loss and a guy who hasn't beaten a single proven world level opponent should not be fighting for vacant world titles, let alone 2 or 3.
I agree but my point is AJ v Wlad is an absolutely massive fight and does not require any more titles. It's just Hearn justifying not making it.
If I was in charge of Joshua I would be milking it longer Wlad is still a risky fight.
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 07:13
by TheGman
Rexob wrote:Horse wrote:Joshua is the most overrated fighter on earth.
Yes, probably true at the minute until he steps up.
Haters gonna hate
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 07:16
by BitPlayer
Naandrew wrote:BitPlayer wrote:Naandrew wrote:Hearn was saying he doesn't want this fight unless Fury gets stripped and the other belts are on the lines.
THIS FIGHT DOESNT NEED F**KING BELTS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Right now this fight would be huge and if AJ destroyed Wlad then he becomes the man because it looks like Fury is never fighting again.
Hearn just making excuses this fight isn't happening.
A guy coming off a loss and a guy who hasn't beaten a single proven world level opponent should not be fighting for vacant world titles, let alone 2 or 3.
I agree but my point is AJ v Wlad is an absolutely massive fight and does not require any more titles. It's just Hearn justifying not making it.
If I was in charge of Joshua I would be milking it longer Wlad is still a risky fight.
Yeah I agree
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 07:20
by Rexob
thechump wrote:Rexob wrote:Horse wrote:Joshua is the most overrated fighter on earth.
Yes, probably true at the minute until he steps up.
Haters gonna hate
I don't hate Joshua just think he is probably overrated, until he can get that defining fight to prove himself, people Like Charles Martin are not defining. A Wlad, Wilder or Fury fight are the only ones who will really show he has it.
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 07:55
by TheGman
Rexob wrote:thechump wrote:Rexob wrote:
Yes, probably true at the minute until he steps up.
Haters gonna hate
I don't hate Joshua just think he is probably overrated, until he can get that defining fight to prove himself, people Like Charles Martin are not defining. A Wlad, Wilder or Fury fight are the only ones who will really show he has it.
Carlsberg is probably the best lager in the world but it isnt,catch my drift

Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 27 Sep 2016, 10:04
by Bard of Boxrec
BitPlayer wrote:Riddick Blowe wrote:Horse thinks not having a 'top ten win' (whatever that is worth in this shitty division) automatically precludes someone from picking Joshua over wladimir.
It means not having a win over a top ten fighter.
And here something weird, if the competition is poor, that means you need to fight higher ranked opponents to be credible, not lower.
because a Kubrat Pulev bout is going to teach Joshua Soooooo much about what it means to be a top fighter

Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 27 Sep 2016, 12:20
by lillywhite14
Joshua may be wildly overrated but Wlad is old. He has looked very old in his last two. He could well be completely shot.
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 27 Sep 2016, 16:35
by BitPlayer
Riddick Blowe wrote:BitPlayer wrote:Riddick Blowe wrote:Horse thinks not having a 'top ten win' (whatever that is worth in this shitty division) automatically precludes someone from picking Joshua over wladimir.
It means not having a win over a top ten fighter.
And here something weird, if the competition is poor, that means you need to fight higher ranked opponents to be credible, not lower.
because a Kubrat Pulev bout is going to teach Joshua Soooooo much about what it means to be a top fighter

Considering his best opponents have been Whyte and Breazeale, it likely would.
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 27 Sep 2016, 17:32
by Horse
BitPlayer wrote:Considering his best opponents have been Whyte and Breazeale, it likely would.
Your logic is wasted on him.
Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 27 Sep 2016, 17:35
by DannyMCR
Horse wrote:Joshua is the most overrated fighter on earth.
But Khan made your September top ten British P4P
