BoxRec

Sklar wrote:Paul is as worthy as anyone else to fight for one of these valueless belts.

You really believe that?

lefty wrote:

Counter-puncher wrote:Paul Smith licks the sweat off the balls of a dead man.

Cheers, Im gonna vomit. Better than dog pound Joe's extracurricular activities though, I guess .....

Which are?

http://www.BS.com/wba-orders-z ... st--112349

Tomasino wrote:

Sklar wrote:Paul is as worthy as anyone else to fight for one of these valueless belts.

You really believe that?

I really believe that Paul is worthy of fighting for a valueless title, yes.

Naandrew wrote:http://www.BS.com/wba-orders-z ... st--112349

Smigga will be fuming - I bet he reckons the WBA have always had it in for Scousers like

bripez wrote:

Naandrew wrote:http://www.BS.com/wba-orders-z ... st--112349

Smigga will be fuming - I bet he reckons the WBA have always had it in for Scousers like

No doubt Hearn will throw some money at it and make it happy to setup a fight with groves or a nunification with degale I just can't understand how anyone could justify this guy fighting for any kind of title

Every time he has stepped up beyond domestic level he has been soundly beaten. He's even been beat at domestic level.

rio wrote:Every time he has stepped up beyond domestic level he has been soundly beaten. He's even been beat at domestic level.

Abraham didn't soundly beat him the first time.

Horse wrote:

rio wrote:Every time he has stepped up beyond domestic level he has been soundly beaten. He's even been beat at domestic level.

Abraham didn't soundly beat him the first time.

He clearly won the fight though.

Then absolutely battered him in the rematch.

Naandrew wrote:He clearly won the fight though.

Then absolutely battered him in the rematch.

No, he didn't.

Naandrew wrote:

Horse wrote:

rio wrote:Every time he has stepped up beyond domestic level he has been soundly beaten. He's even been beat at domestic level.

Abraham didn't soundly beat him the first time.

He clearly won the fight though.

Then absolutely battered him in the rematch.

He didn't clearly win. Give the man his due even if you don't like him

Stevieb8006 wrote:

Naandrew wrote:

Horse wrote:Abraham didn't soundly beat him the first time.

He clearly won the fight though.

Then absolutely battered him in the rematch.

He didn't clearly win. Give the man his due even if you don't like him

I don't know whether the word clearly has been misinterpreted here sometimes it can be seen as a wide points win. Where as I meant it to be AA deserved the verdict

I thought the first fight was closeI think I had it 116-112 AA or 115-113 AA. There was a 119-109 scorecard was a joke and the main reason for the rematch happening.

Smith shown balls in both fights but has done nothing to deserve any version of a world title fight. m

Why won't he fight someone like fielding, Blackledge, rebrasse, sjeloka type guys to become mandatory or between any world title fight.

Because his team know he will get beat.

Naandrew wrote:I don't know whether the word clearly has been misinterpreted here sometimes it can be seen as a wide points win. Where as I meant it to be AA deserved the verdict

I thought the first fight was closeI think I had it 116-112 AA or 115-113 AA. There was a 119-109 scorecard was a joke and the main reason for the rematch happening.

Your scorecard is your own.

It was not a clear win according to the consensus.

Naandrew wrote:Why won't he fight someone like fielding, Blackledge, rebrasse, sjeloka type guys to become mandatory or between any world title fight.

Because his team know he will get beat.

His team knows that he will get beat by Blackledge?

Was his close loss to Abraham that impressive though I mean what's AA best win at super middleweight

Zeuge is no world beater either, but he probably decisions Smith.

Giovanni De Carolis and Paul Smith should duke it out.

The self-entitlement is unreal. It's 3 and half years since he beat Dodson and he hasn't won a proper fight since.

I'm not a big George Groves fan but in fairness in between world title shots he has fought Rebrasse, Douglin, Di Luisa, Brophy, Murray and Gutknecht. No real world beaters but on the whole it's decent opposition. Meanwhile, while waiting for his next world title shot, Smith has fought Kubin, Grafka and Regi.

Groves' opponent's combined record = 136-15-6.
Smith's opponent's combined record = 63-51-5.

Smigging hell, another shot he must have come stains all over him.

Horse wrote:

Naandrew wrote:I don't know whether the word clearly has been misinterpreted here sometimes it can be seen as a wide points win. Where as I meant it to be AA deserved the verdict

I thought the first fight was closeI think I had it 116-112 AA or 115-113 AA. There was a 119-109 scorecard was a joke and the main reason for the rematch happening.

Your scorecard is your own.

It was not a clear win according to the consensus.

Naandrew wrote:Why won't he fight someone like fielding, Blackledge, rebrasse, sjeloka type guys to become mandatory or between any world title fight.

Because his team know he will get beat.

His team knows that he will get beat by Blackledge?

Consensus had AA handily winning the rematch, although that still earned Smith a nice promotion in your rankings. I generally like your rankings, but that was a strange one.

Hope smigga does it and although its the reguler wba title i think he will win 5th round ko

ElJefe wrote:The self-entitlement is unreal. It's 3 and half years since he beat Dodson and he hasn't won a proper fight since.

I'm not a big George Groves fan but in fairness in between world title shots he has fought Rebrasse, Douglin, Di Luisa, Brophy, Murray and Gutknecht. No real world beaters but on the whole it's decent opposition. Meanwhile, while waiting for his next world title shot, Smith has fought Kubin, Grafka and Regi.

Groves' opponent's combined record = 136-15-6.
Smith's opponent's combined record = 63-51-5.

That's a killer statistic. No further questions M'lud.

Good work!