Page 4 of 4

Re: Broner v Granados

Posted: 19 Feb 2017, 00:52
by Tanzio
Cards =

97-93 Broner
97-93 Granados
96-94 Broner

No surprises.

Re: Broner v Granados

Posted: 19 Feb 2017, 00:53
by diddy
There's only 1 way that decision was going.

Hope someone else also cashed in on it.

Re: Broner v Granados

Posted: 19 Feb 2017, 00:53
by Nightmare Roy
Poor kid has no luck with decisions

Re: Broner v Granados

Posted: 19 Feb 2017, 00:53
by DrunkenBoxer
those score card though... Draw or Granados edging it.

Re: Broner v Granados

Posted: 19 Feb 2017, 00:53
by gilgamesh
lazboy wrote:Bronwr would get caved by all the top welterweights lamount included.
Top guys at 135 or 140 beat him too.

Re: Broner v Granados

Posted: 19 Feb 2017, 00:54
by crusader
Granados has still only lost by SD or MD

Re: Broner v Granados

Posted: 19 Feb 2017, 00:57
by lazboy
gilgamesh wrote:
lazboy wrote:Bronwr would get caved by all the top welterweights lamount included.
Top guys at 135 or 140 beat him too.
U know them better than I do. I'll take your word. There's a blueprint to beat him thanks to maidana.

Re: Broner v Granados

Posted: 19 Feb 2017, 00:58
by Tanzio
Broner is such a fvcking pudendum. Talks sh!t about it being easy then makes sh!t up about his hand being injured.

Then Granados goes off about legit sh!t.

THEN, Broner apologizes to everyone for being a poor role model and promises to be better!!

Classic post fight.

Re: Broner v Granados

Posted: 19 Feb 2017, 01:01
by Tanzio
Broner is definitely nothing more than gatekeeper material at 147, and I prefer Granados in that role.

Re: Broner v Granados

Posted: 19 Feb 2017, 01:09
by gilgamesh
Tanzio wrote:Broner is definitely nothing more than gatekeeper material at 147, and I prefer Granados in that role.
He ain't much more than Gatekeeper at 140 either.

Re: Broner v Granados

Posted: 19 Feb 2017, 01:12
by Tanzio
gilgamesh wrote:
Tanzio wrote:Broner is definitely nothing more than gatekeeper material at 147, and I prefer Granados in that role.
He ain't much more than Gatekeeper at 140 either.
True. I doubt he can get there anymore.

I smell Broner v Peterson

Re: Broner v Granados

Posted: 19 Feb 2017, 01:28
by Tanzio
Nice Showtime card. 2017 is off to a really decent start. :clap:

Re: Broner v Granados

Posted: 19 Feb 2017, 01:30
by boxing_rocks
Tanzio wrote:Broner is definitely nothing more than gatekeeper material at 147, and I prefer Granados in that role.
I would prefer Peterson and Avetisyan to Granados and Broner. The first fight was so much cleaner and more entertaining than the second one. Can you imagine any of these 4 guys against Spence? Wouldn't last 3 rounds.

Re: Broner v Granados

Posted: 19 Feb 2017, 01:36
by gilgamesh
boxing_rocks wrote:
Tanzio wrote:Broner is definitely nothing more than gatekeeper material at 147, and I prefer Granados in that role.
I would prefer Peterson and Avetisyan to Granados and Broner. The first fight was so much cleaner and more entertaining than the second one. Can you imagine any of these 4 guys against Spence? Wouldn't last 3 rounds.
It might last more than 3 rounds, but he'd dominate 'em all definitely.

Re: Broner v Granados

Posted: 19 Feb 2017, 01:38
by Tanzio
boxing_rocks wrote:
Tanzio wrote:Broner is definitely nothing more than gatekeeper material at 147, and I prefer Granados in that role.
I would prefer Peterson and Avetisyan to Granados and Broner. The first fight was so much cleaner and more entertaining than the second one. Can you imagine any of these 4 guys against Spence? Wouldn't last 3 rounds.
Yep, these guys were triple A ball at best.

I did prefer the Broner v Granados fight. Would like to see Granados v Ava.

Re: Broner v Granados

Posted: 19 Feb 2017, 01:44
by Tanzio
I think both Lomassiah and Mikey could beat Broner right now.

Re: Broner v Granados

Posted: 19 Feb 2017, 01:45
by gilgamesh
Tanzio wrote:I think both Lomassiah and Mikey could beat Broner right now.
Definitely