Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
Posted: 26 Jun 2017, 18:41
I doubt this fight is going to happen after the IBF orders an immediate rematch for Dirrell
Think you've got the wrong Dirrell mate. That's his brother Andre.KiwiRider wrote:I doubt this fight is going to happen after the IBF orders an immediate rematch for Dirrell
Of course that's what he's doing. The Dirrell's are the biggest bunch of p*ssies I've ever seen in this sport. I'll be glad when I've seen the back of 'em and I'll be rooting for them both to get beaten severely every time they ever fight again.wesshaw1985 wrote:http://www.BS.com/anthony-dirr ... nt--118032
Me too!gilgamesh wrote:Of course that's what he's doing. The Dirrell's are the biggest bunch of p*ssies I've ever seen in this sport. I'll be glad when I've seen the back of 'em and I'll be rooting for them both to get beaten severely every time they ever fight again.wesshaw1985 wrote:http://www.BS.com/anthony-dirr ... nt--118032
Yeah. I find it's a more enjoyable viewing experience to be watching a guy you hate as opposed to a guy you feel nothing about. It's always a little more fun when you have some sort of emotional investment in the outcome. It's fun regardless though usually.KiwiRider wrote:Me too!gilgamesh wrote:Of course that's what he's doing. The Dirrell's are the biggest bunch of p*ssies I've ever seen in this sport. I'll be glad when I've seen the back of 'em and I'll be rooting for them both to get beaten severely every time they ever fight again.wesshaw1985 wrote:http://www.BS.com/anthony-dirr ... nt--118032
But isn't that the flip side of boxing.
To cheer for your favourites, and to cheer for anyone to beat guys like Dirrell's, Money weather, Aduckis, Broner, Wilder perhaps
He screwed himself. Dirrell is still fighting for the belt, Smith has pulled out. They didn't want to fight in flint, but if that is the case they should have won the purse bidsBillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
No he wasn't, if you want to really get down to hit he hasn't done anything to earn a shot. Now he has a much more lucrative opportunity.BillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
He's rank 1, he deserves a shotSaadOffTheDeck wrote:No he wasn't, if you want to really get down to hit he hasn't done anything to earn a shot. Now he has a much more lucrative opportunity.BillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
well..... he should be the next in line for a shot yes, but he doesn't deserve one, then again its not often someone does these daysOssyrules wrote:He's rank 1, he deserves a shotSaadOffTheDeck wrote:No he wasn't, if you want to really get down to hit he hasn't done anything to earn a shot. Now he has a much more lucrative opportunity.BillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
He can have a shot, he'd rather be in the more lucrative tournament.Ossyrules wrote:He's rank 1, he deserves a shotSaadOffTheDeck wrote:No he wasn't, if you want to really get down to hit he hasn't done anything to earn a shot. Now he has a much more lucrative opportunity.BillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
AgreeSaadOffTheDeck wrote:He can have a shot, he'd rather be in the more lucrative tournament.Ossyrules wrote:He's rank 1, he deserves a shotSaadOffTheDeck wrote: No he wasn't, if you want to really get down to hit he hasn't done anything to earn a shot. Now he has a much more lucrative opportunity.
They did go to purse bids they ( Dirrels team ) won it. The never officially announced an LA card. It seemed the fight was going to be on the undercard of the Leo Santa Cruz Mares rematch but they haven't reached a deal. ( in fact the WBA just called purse bids for that.rio wrote:He screwed himself. Dirrell is still fighting for the belt, Smith has pulled out. They didn't want to fight in flint, but if that is the case they should have won the purse bidsBillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
If the bold was true then Dirrel v Benavidez is more marketable on that undercard anyway.Naandrew wrote:They did go to purse bids they ( Dirrels team ) won it. The never officially announced an LA card. It seemed the fight was going to be on the undercard of the Leo Santa Cruz Mares rematch but they haven't reached a deal. ( in fact the WBA just called purse bids for that.rio wrote:He screwed himself. Dirrell is still fighting for the belt, Smith has pulled out. They didn't want to fight in flint, but if that is the case they should have won the purse bidsBillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
You are bang on apart from that though. Smith has pulled out of the fight with Dirrell because he would NOT fight him in his home town FACT.
Let see watched Benevidez v Medina a couple of weeks ago on the PBC website. I'm on the hype train considering his age he looks a very special prospect.Tanzio wrote:If the bold was true then Dirrel v Benavidez is more marketable on that undercard anyway.Naandrew wrote:They did go to purse bids they ( Dirrels team ) won it. The never officially announced an LA card. It seemed the fight was going to be on the undercard of the Leo Santa Cruz Mares rematch but they haven't reached a deal. ( in fact the WBA just called purse bids for that.rio wrote:
He screwed himself. Dirrell is still fighting for the belt, Smith has pulled out. They didn't want to fight in flint, but if that is the case they should have won the purse bids
You are bang on apart from that though. Smith has pulled out of the fight with Dirrell because he would NOT fight him in his home town FACT.
Naandrew wrote:Let see watched Benevidez v Medina a couple of weeks ago on the PBC website. I'm on the hype train considering his age he looks a very special prospect.Tanzio wrote:If the bold was true then Dirrel v Benavidez is more marketable on that undercard anyway.Naandrew wrote:
They did go to purse bids they ( Dirrels team ) won it. The never officially announced an LA card. It seemed the fight was going to be on the undercard of the Leo Santa Cruz Mares rematch but they haven't reached a deal. ( in fact the WBA just called purse bids for that.
You are bang on apart from that though. Smith has pulled out of the fight with Dirrell because he would NOT fight him in his home town FACT.