Page 4 of 5

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 26 Jun 2017, 18:41
by KiwiRider
I doubt this fight is going to happen after the IBF orders an immediate rematch for Dirrell

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 27 Jun 2017, 10:24
by PredatorHayds
KiwiRider wrote:I doubt this fight is going to happen after the IBF orders an immediate rematch for Dirrell
Think you've got the wrong Dirrell mate. That's his brother Andre.

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 30 Jun 2017, 02:48
by wesshaw1985

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 30 Jun 2017, 10:44
by Andrew
Talk of this being off now :lol:

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 30 Jun 2017, 15:26
by mickey1975
I will believe Callum will fight someone decent when I see him in the ring.

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 30 Jun 2017, 15:32
by gilgamesh
Of course that's what he's doing. The Dirrell's are the biggest bunch of p*ssies I've ever seen in this sport. I'll be glad when I've seen the back of 'em and I'll be rooting for them both to get beaten severely every time they ever fight again.

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 30 Jun 2017, 17:21
by KiwiRider
gilgamesh wrote:
Of course that's what he's doing. The Dirrell's are the biggest bunch of p*ssies I've ever seen in this sport. I'll be glad when I've seen the back of 'em and I'll be rooting for them both to get beaten severely every time they ever fight again.
Me too!
But isn't that the flip side of boxing.
To cheer for your favourites, and to cheer for anyone to beat guys like Dirrell's, Money weather, Aduckis, Broner, Wilder perhaps

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 30 Jun 2017, 18:26
by gilgamesh
KiwiRider wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Of course that's what he's doing. The Dirrell's are the biggest bunch of p*ssies I've ever seen in this sport. I'll be glad when I've seen the back of 'em and I'll be rooting for them both to get beaten severely every time they ever fight again.
Me too!
But isn't that the flip side of boxing.
To cheer for your favourites, and to cheer for anyone to beat guys like Dirrell's, Money weather, Aduckis, Broner, Wilder perhaps
Yeah. I find it's a more enjoyable viewing experience to be watching a guy you hate as opposed to a guy you feel nothing about. It's always a little more fun when you have some sort of emotional investment in the outcome. It's fun regardless though usually.

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 04 Jul 2017, 16:51
by wesshaw1985
Hearn: Dirrell Refused To Enter WBSS, So Smith Can't Go Either - http://www.BS.com/hearn-dirrel ... er--118177

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 06 Jul 2017, 05:16
by GlobalBox
Smith now in the WBSS competition, incredibly so is Jurgen Braehmer, he looked dead at weigh in for 175 not sure how he makes 168.

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 06 Jul 2017, 06:03
by Zubrei
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/bo ... g-13290072

Big decision, looks like Dirrel was going to get his own way and get the fight moved to Flint. Looking at the line-up, he looks to be 2nd faviourate behind Groves. Braehmer will have to cut off a leg to make 168 in any kind of shape. Wonder who the other 3 will be, Degale, Eubank Jr, Chavez Jr, Zeuge??

It needs another 3 decent bigger names....

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 06 Jul 2017, 06:38
by BillyTKid
Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 06 Jul 2017, 06:48
by rio
BillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
He screwed himself. Dirrell is still fighting for the belt, Smith has pulled out. They didn't want to fight in flint, but if that is the case they should have won the purse bids

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 06 Jul 2017, 06:55
by SaadOffTheDeck
BillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
No he wasn't, if you want to really get down to hit he hasn't done anything to earn a shot. Now he has a much more lucrative opportunity.

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 06 Jul 2017, 08:26
by Ossyrules
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
BillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
No he wasn't, if you want to really get down to hit he hasn't done anything to earn a shot. Now he has a much more lucrative opportunity.
He's rank 1, he deserves a shot

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 06 Jul 2017, 09:28
by littlepug
Ossyrules wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
BillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
No he wasn't, if you want to really get down to hit he hasn't done anything to earn a shot. Now he has a much more lucrative opportunity.
He's rank 1, he deserves a shot
well..... he should be the next in line for a shot yes, but he doesn't deserve one, then again its not often someone does these days

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 06 Jul 2017, 11:01
by SaadOffTheDeck
Ossyrules wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
BillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
No he wasn't, if you want to really get down to hit he hasn't done anything to earn a shot. Now he has a much more lucrative opportunity.
He's rank 1, he deserves a shot
He can have a shot, he'd rather be in the more lucrative tournament.

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 06 Jul 2017, 11:25
by Ossyrules
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Ossyrules wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote: No he wasn't, if you want to really get down to hit he hasn't done anything to earn a shot. Now he has a much more lucrative opportunity.
He's rank 1, he deserves a shot
He can have a shot, he'd rather be in the more lucrative tournament.
Agree

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 06 Jul 2017, 12:54
by mickey1975
His first fight in the tournament is for the diamond belt.

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 06 Jul 2017, 14:59
by Andrew
rio wrote:
BillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
He screwed himself. Dirrell is still fighting for the belt, Smith has pulled out. They didn't want to fight in flint, but if that is the case they should have won the purse bids
They did go to purse bids they ( Dirrels team ) won it. The never officially announced an LA card. It seemed the fight was going to be on the undercard of the Leo Santa Cruz Mares rematch but they haven't reached a deal. ( in fact the WBA just called purse bids for that.

You are bang on apart from that though. Smith has pulled out of the fight with Dirrell because he would NOT fight him in his home town FACT.

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 06 Jul 2017, 15:01
by Andrew
Watch Eddie Hearn and Joe Gallagher claim Callum to be a world champion if he gets this bull5h!t diamond belt.

Anyway looks like David Benevidez is stepping in. Just watch a 20 year old step in and smash Dirrell in Flint now.

Benevidez when he develops will be multiple levels above Callum Smith he already has a better win on his resume.

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 06 Jul 2017, 15:04
by Tanzio
Naandrew wrote:
rio wrote:
BillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
He screwed himself. Dirrell is still fighting for the belt, Smith has pulled out. They didn't want to fight in flint, but if that is the case they should have won the purse bids
They did go to purse bids they ( Dirrels team ) won it. The never officially announced an LA card. It seemed the fight was going to be on the undercard of the Leo Santa Cruz Mares rematch but they haven't reached a deal. ( in fact the WBA just called purse bids for that.

You are bang on apart from that though. Smith has pulled out of the fight with Dirrell because he would NOT fight him in his home town FACT.
If the bold was true then Dirrel v Benavidez is more marketable on that undercard anyway.

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 06 Jul 2017, 15:09
by Andrew
Tanzio wrote:
Naandrew wrote:
rio wrote:
He screwed himself. Dirrell is still fighting for the belt, Smith has pulled out. They didn't want to fight in flint, but if that is the case they should have won the purse bids
They did go to purse bids they ( Dirrels team ) won it. The never officially announced an LA card. It seemed the fight was going to be on the undercard of the Leo Santa Cruz Mares rematch but they haven't reached a deal. ( in fact the WBA just called purse bids for that.

You are bang on apart from that though. Smith has pulled out of the fight with Dirrell because he would NOT fight him in his home town FACT.
If the bold was true then Dirrel v Benavidez is more marketable on that undercard anyway.
Let see watched Benevidez v Medina a couple of weeks ago on the PBC website. I'm on the hype train considering his age he looks a very special prospect.

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017

Posted: 06 Jul 2017, 15:12
by Tanzio
Naandrew wrote:
Tanzio wrote:
Naandrew wrote:
They did go to purse bids they ( Dirrels team ) won it. The never officially announced an LA card. It seemed the fight was going to be on the undercard of the Leo Santa Cruz Mares rematch but they haven't reached a deal. ( in fact the WBA just called purse bids for that.

You are bang on apart from that though. Smith has pulled out of the fight with Dirrell because he would NOT fight him in his home town FACT.
If the bold was true then Dirrel v Benavidez is more marketable on that undercard anyway.
Let see watched Benevidez v Medina a couple of weeks ago on the PBC website. I'm on the hype train considering his age he looks a very special prospect.
:OhYes: He definitely passes the eye test. I think that he could rule the division but if he isn't joining the tourney it will be down the road before we find out for certain. He will also be moving up to at minimum LHW before he is 25, imo.

Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - OFF

Posted: 07 Jul 2017, 14:18
by wesshaw1985
Smith Explains Why He Passed on Dirrell Title Bout To Join WBSS - http://www.BS.com/smith-explai ... ss--118272