BoxRec

RonnyJ wrote: ↑12 Apr 2020, 19:03

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑12 Apr 2020, 18:36

Look, I know you have a sad, lonely life with you and your food. I would never waste time arguing with myself on a message board.

Go eat some more fornicating doughnuts and cry about how fat you are. Happy Easter blob slob.

apologize to me!

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑12 Apr 2020, 18:36

RonnyJ wrote: ↑12 Apr 2020, 17:56

you talking about gay, funny, you have 2 accounts onetimeonly and ooggiebi and you write some stuff and than you write on your second account dick riding your first account how good you are, that is ultra gay, so dont throw stones when u in the glass house

Look, I know you have a sad, lonely life with you and your food.

Go eat some more fornicating doughnuts and cry about how fat you are. Happy Easter blob slob.

adislav123 wrote: ↑13 Apr 2020, 19:13 fact is & it can't be said often enough, oog & 1slime are 100 percent the biggest pieces of shite on here.

doesn't really matter if it's a single pile of poo with a split personality or 2 separate titanic turds sucking each other off back & forth.

adislav123 wrote: ↑13 Apr 2020, 22:59 i don't give a flying fart if u & 1slime actually engage in homosexual activity in real life while there is definte proof thread after thread in hundreds of back & forth posts that u metaphorically suck each other off nonstop.

without a doubt it is safe to say oog & 1slime are the 2 vilest & dumbest pieces of poo on this forum.

lazboy wrote: ↑14 Apr 2020, 03:58

adislav123 wrote: ↑13 Apr 2020, 22:59 i don't give a flying fart if u & 1slime actually engage in homosexual activity in real life while there is definte proof thread after thread in hundreds of back & forth posts that u metaphorically suck each other off nonstop.

without a doubt it is safe to say oog & 1slime are the 2 vilest & dumbest pieces of poo on this forum.

I don’t get the hate for oog? He seems like an alright person. I understand the 1slime hate but I respect his knowledge of the sport and he seems decent at times. He may appear more blunt in written form than he actually is. Are you getting the two conflated? Both are clearly not dumb. The dumbest on the form award goes to Ronny aka Jip.

Heretic wrote: ↑14 Apr 2020, 08:31 Getting back on the old topic...

It is kind of funny how Canelo still is the king of boxing and Crawford has still done pretty much nothing but is still regarded as one of the best boxers out there. My self included

Also Fury was not even in the talks back then and now he is one of the biggest things in whole boxing.

RonnyJ wrote: ↑14 Apr 2020, 08:37

Heretic wrote: ↑14 Apr 2020, 08:31 Getting back on the old topic...

It is kind of funny how Canelo still is the king of boxing and Crawford has still done pretty much nothing but is still regarded as one of the best boxers out there. My self included

Also Fury was not even in the talks back then and now he is one of the biggest things in whole boxing.

King of boxing is Lomachenko.
Boxings biggest superstar right now is Canelo.
Crawford is overrated and has done sh:;&t.
Fury is overrated and I don't care for his ugly style.

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑14 Apr 2020, 11:48 Lomachenko couldn't carry Crawford's jock.

stevec@france wrote: ↑14 Apr 2020, 12:02 For me its AJ
why well i feel it must be a HW and show some class and respect for themselves / fans and the sport over a significant period in a stable and consistent manner .
Obviously this rules out a lot of gobshites like wilder & Fury

gilgamesh wrote: ↑14 Apr 2020, 12:00

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑14 Apr 2020, 11:48 Lomachenko couldn't carry Crawford's jock.

Right now he's ahead of him. Crawford may well pass him up in the long run, but Lomachenko has 3 or 4 wins right now better than Crawford's best.

gilgamesh wrote: ↑14 Apr 2020, 12:04

stevec@france wrote: ↑14 Apr 2020, 12:02 For me its AJ
why well i feel it must be a HW and show some class and respect for themselves / fans and the sport over a significant period in a stable and consistent manner .
Obviously this rules out a lot of gobshites like wilder & Fury

Remember how classy Ali, Mike Tyson and Mayweather were?



Often the biggest stars in Boxing have some edge to them. The way they behave. The way they promote themselves.

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑14 Apr 2020, 12:11

gilgamesh wrote: ↑14 Apr 2020, 12:00

Right now he's ahead of him. Crawford may well pass him up in the long run, but Lomachenko has 3 or 4 wins right now better than Crawford's best.

P4p isn't resume, and loma hasn't fought anyone in a minute. Russell is clearly the best win between the two, after that it's subjective. Bud has more power and appears more durable. Everything else is pretty much a toss up. No clear edge at anything for loma. Crawford has clearly been more dominant. Opposition is again subjective.

stevec@france wrote: ↑14 Apr 2020, 12:26

gilgamesh wrote: ↑14 Apr 2020, 12:04

Remember how classy Ali, Mike Tyson and Mayweather were?



Often the biggest stars in Boxing have some edge to them. The way they behave. The way they promote themselves.

I prefer to think humanity has moved on somewhat !

gilgamesh wrote: ↑14 Apr 2020, 12:26

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑14 Apr 2020, 12:11

P4p isn't resume, and loma hasn't fought anyone in a minute. Russell is clearly the best win between the two, after that it's subjective. Bud has more power and appears more durable. Everything else is pretty much a toss up. No clear edge at anything for loma. Crawford has clearly been more dominant. Opposition is again subjective.

Crawford definitely has more power. Better defense. Probably a better chin (haven't really seen him hurt any). Excellent timing with his punches, and a fantastic ability to adjust.

Lomachenko is faster (even in a P4P sense, I know he's lighter), has the best footwork I've ever seen, and when challenged was able to turn his game up a notch too to get it done.

Both are fantastic fighters. Loma's 'just had better opposition, and better chances to prove it.

I'm a big fan of both. I would hope Crawford gets a marquee fight sooner than later. It'd be a shame if his whole career just winds up as a "what if".

I don't think it's subjective that Russell, Walters, and Linares have been better wins than Crawford's. You could put Khan and Gamboa right there with Walters and Linares.

Walters was coming off a destruction of Donaire, who JUST managed to reach the finals of the World Boxing Super Series, and has never been destroyed like that any other time. Including by Inoue. So beating Walters the way Loma did says something.

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑14 Apr 2020, 13:24 For sure, what makes him better than postal?

gilgamesh wrote: ↑14 Apr 2020, 13:30

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑14 Apr 2020, 13:24 For sure, what makes him better than postal?

When he fought the best guys he's faced, he beat 'em. More nimble on his feet than Postol. Though they have a similar approach from the waist up.