Page 4 of 4

Re: David Lemiuex

Posted: 08 Oct 2017, 20:48
by lazboy
boxing_rocks wrote:
lazboy wrote:Can’t say I scored the rounds but I remember Lemieux loosing a significant amount of momentum.
That's what happens when you start fighting with one hand.
Alright mate well you get me the medical report and I’ll believe you and Lemieux.

Re: David Lemiuex

Posted: 08 Oct 2017, 21:08
by boxing_rocks
lazboy wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:
lazboy wrote:Can’t say I scored the rounds but I remember Lemieux loosing a significant amount of momentum.
That's what happens when you start fighting with one hand.
Alright mate well you get me the medical report and I’ll believe you and Lemieux.
Are you another alt of fergus? Should that report be notarized?

Re: David Lemiuex

Posted: 08 Oct 2017, 21:23
by lazboy
boxing_rocks wrote:
lazboy wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:
That's what happens when you start fighting with one hand.
Alright mate well you get me the medical report and I’ll believe you and Lemieux.
Are you another alt of fergus? Should that report be notarized?
I’d definitely want the document signed by the gp, not by you. You’re no GP.

Re: David Lemiuex

Posted: 09 Oct 2017, 07:40
by caldo2025
What's NOT to like about David Lemieux? Honestly? Anyone complaining about an exciting fighter that will step in against anyone at any time and will go down swinging from his shoes until it's over has got issues. Boxing needs more David Lemieux's.

Re: David Lemiuex

Posted: 09 Oct 2017, 19:12
by boxing_rocks
caldo2025 wrote:What's NOT to like about David Lemieux? Honestly? Anyone complaining about an exciting fighter that will step in against anyone at any time and will go down swinging from his shoes until it's over has got issues. Boxing needs more David Lemieux's.
Exactly. Boxing would be popular if there were more Lemieuxs.

Re: David Lemiuex

Posted: 10 Oct 2017, 02:07
by Tanzio
I just don't see Lemieux being overrated. The vast majority of people who know he exists consider him a good contender who will likely lose to every top level boxer he meets.

People like him because he is in good fights. I felt he was way overrated before he gassed v Rubio. I started calling him Lepieux, but to his credit, even after the Alcine loss, he stuck with it and improved his cardio and his skills.

I consider him a high level MW gatekeeper.

Re: David Lemiuex

Posted: 10 Oct 2017, 07:39
by caldo2025
Tanzio wrote:I just don't see Lemieux being overrated. The vast majority of people who know he exists consider him a good contender who will likely lose to every top level boxer he meets.

People like him because he is in good fights. I felt he was way overrated before he gassed v Rubio. I started calling him Lepieux, but to his credit, even after the Alcine loss, he stuck with it and improved his cardio and his skills.

I consider him a high level MW gatekeeper.
I'd love to see Lemieux vs. Jacobs. I think that the public would change their opinion of DL after a fight like that. All that they remember is the the two fights he lost earlier in his career when he didn't have the cardio or experience and the beating he took from an ATG like GGG. Btw, there's nothing wrong with losing to GGG. At worst, Lemieux is in the top 5 in the ever improving and entertaining MW division. Not bad.